Micronutrient inadequacy and urinary stone disease: an analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2018.

Urinary stone disease is common and affects approximately 10% of the American adults. The role of diet in stone formation is well-recognized; however, the literature focus has been on dietary excess rather than micronutrient inadequacy. As patients with stones may be at risk for nutrient inadequacies, we investigated the role of micronutrient inadequacy in stone formation by performing a cross-sectional analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on adults who were not taking dietary supplements. Micronutrient intake was obtained from 24-h dietary recalls, and usual intake was calculated. Survey-weighted, adjusted logistic regression was used for an incident analysis on having any history of stones. An additional analysis on recurrent stone-formers was performed with the outcome being 2 or more stones passed. Finally, a sensitivity analysis using quasi-Poisson regression was performed with the outcome being number of stones passed. There were 9777 respondents representing 81,087,345 adults, of which 9.36% had a stone history. Our incident analysis revealed inadequate vitamin A intake to be associated with stone formation (OR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03-1.71). Recurrent analysis did not find any significant associations, while our sensitivity analysis revealed inadequate vitamin A (IRR 1.96, 95% CI: 1.28-3.00) and pyridoxine (IRR 1.99, 95% CI: 1.11-3.55) to be associated with a higher number of recurrent stones. Hence, inadequate dietary intake of vitamin A and pyridoxine was associated with nephrolithiasis. Further research is needed to identify the roles of these micronutrients in stone-formers and the potential for evaluation and treatment.

Antimicrobial resistance patterns in cases of obstructive pyelonephritis secondary to stones.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the local antimicrobial resistance pattern in patients with obstructing ureteral stones and fever, compare this with our local antibiograms, and guide recommendations for empiric antibiotic regimens. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent ureteroscopic intervention for the management of ureteral stones at a neighboring private hospital and a public hospital to identify those patients who had undergone prior decompression for obstructing ureteral stones and fever between 2004 and 2011. Urine culture results were captured to identify uropathogens and sensitivity patterns to antibiotics. These were compared with respective hospital antibiograms. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were identified, of which 35 had positive urine culture results. More than 25% of the voided urine and upper urinary tract urine cultures differed. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were higher for patients at the public hospital than the hospital antibiogram. The opposite was true at the private hospital. The public hospital demonstrated an overall higher resistance pattern than the private hospital. CONCLUSION: Antimicrobial resistance makes the selection of empiric antibiotic treatment challenging in patients with obstructive pyelonephritis secondary to ureteral stones. Because of discordance between voided urine cultures and those captured at the time of decompression, it is imperative to obtain both voided urine and urine from the kidney to ensure adequate antibiotic coverage. Local population-specific antimicrobial guidelines that are frequently updated are essential to ensure adequate coverage and treatment of obstructive pyelonephritis, and condition-specific antibiograms would be recommended in the future.