Effects of post-isometric relaxation, myofascial trigger point release and routine physical therapy in management of acute mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of post-isometric relaxation, myofascial trigger point release and routine physical therapy on pain, disability and cervical range of motion in patients with acute mechanical neck pain. METHODS: The randomised control trial was conducted at the District Headquarter Hospital in Nowshehra, Pakistan, from July to December 2017 and comprised subjects of either gender aged 16-49 years with acute neck pain. They were randomised into three groups; post-isometric relaxation group 1, myofascial trigger point release group 2 and routine physical therapy group 3. Neck disability index, numeric pain rating scale and cervical goniometry were documented before intervention, after the first session and after 6 sessions in two weeks. Data was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 60 patients, there were 20(33.3%) in each of the three groups. Mean age in group 1 was 32.25±9.56 years, group 2 2.35±9.05 years and in group 3 it was 32.75±7.82 years. Scores for neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale as well as rotation to right and left showed significant difference among the groups post-treatment (p<0.05). Within group analysis showed significant improvements in all parameters post-treatment in all the groups (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Acute mechanical neck pain treated with post-isometric relaxation technique had more and faster effect in decreasing pain and disability and in improving mobility.

Effects of static stretching as compared to autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques in the management of mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of static stretching with autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy techniques on pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain. METHODS: A parallel design randomised controlled trial was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital and Railway-General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from April to November, 2017, and comprised of patients aged 18-70 years with neck pain of moderate intensity scoring 4-8 on numeric pain rating scale with limited or painful range of motion. The patients were randomly allocated via lottery method into static stretching group, autogenic inhibition muscle energy technique group and reciprocal inhibition muscle energy technique group. All the subjects received five consecutive treatments sessions. Outcome measurements included numeric pain rating scale score, neck disability index score and goniometry for cervical range of motion. Data was collected at baseline and after first and fifth sessions, and was analysed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 78 subjects, there were 26(33.3%) in each of the three groups. Of them 7 were lost to follow-up and the study was completed by 71(91%) subjects. The overall mean age was 41.55±11.89 years (p>0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups at baseline (p>0.05). However, at first and second follow-up, there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups in terms of immediate and short-term relief, except for immediate effects related to range of motion (p=0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Significant difference existed among static stretching, autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition groups in terms of pain, disability and range of motion in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Effects of Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides with and without thoracic posture correction techniques on mechanical back pain: a randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine effectiveness of sustained natural apophyseal glides with and without thoracic postural correction techniques on patients of chronic mechanical low back pain . METHODS: The randomized control trial was conducted at the National Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, Islamabad, Pakistan, from November 1, 2015, to January 31, 2016, and comprised females aged 20-60 years experiencing mechanical low back pain for more than 03 months. They were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group 1 was given Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides mobilization, while group2 was given the same along with thoracic postural correction techniques for 4 weeks, 3 sessions per week and one session per day. Outcome measures included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Goniometry of Lumbar Range of Motion. Data was analysed using SPSS 20. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, there were 20(50%) in each of the groups. Mean age of patients in group 1 was 41.30±10.45years, while in group 2 it was 35.12±9.04 years. Compared to the baseline readings, pain, functional independence and range of motion showed significant improvement (p<0.0001) postintervention in both groups. Mean scores in group 2 showed more improvement than group 1 (p<0.0001) in all variables. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of thoracic postural correction exercises along with sustained natural apophyseal glides was noted in patients with mechanical low back pain.

Effect of Mulligan spinal mobilization with arm movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction in cervical radiculopathy patients: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of Mulligan Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction on pain, disablity and cervical range of motion in cervical radiculopathy patients. METHODS: The randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted from August to December 2017 at the Railway General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, and comprised cervical radiculopathy patients of either gender aged 20-60 years. They were randomised into two groups, with the experimental Group A getting treated with Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction, while the control group B only getting treated with neurodynamics and manual traction. The pain, disability and cervical range of motion were assessed before and after treatment of 3 weeks using Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Neck Disability Index and Goniometry. Data was analyzed using SPSS 21. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients, 19(61.3%) were females and 12(38.7%) were males. The overall mean age was 41.65±9.714 years. There were 15(48.4%) patients in Group A, and 16(51.6%) in Group B. Group A showed significantly better results in terms of pain, disability and cervical range of motion (p<0.05 each). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with Spinal Mobilisation with Arm Movement along with neurodynamics and manual traction had better outcome compared to those who only got neurodynamics and manual traction.

Comparison between Manual Traction, Manual Opening technique and Combination in Patients with cervical radiculopathy: Randomized Control Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of manual traction, manual intervertebral foramen opening technique and combination of the two techniques in patients with cervical radiculopathy. METHODS: The single-blind randomised control trial was conducted at Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from July 2017 to January 2018, and comprised patients of either gender having unilateral upper extremity pain, paresthesia or numbness. The subjects were placed into groups I, II and III using sealed envelope method. Group I was treated with the opening of intervertebral foramen technique, while group II received manual traction of cervical spine, and group III received both techniques. Three sessions were conducted per week for 3 weeks. The outcome measures were neck disability index, Numeric pain rating scale, patient-specific functional scale, and range of motions of cervical spine. SPSS 21 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients, 17(30%) were males and 23(70%) were females. There were 13(32.5%)patients each in groups I and II, while group III had 14(35%). Mean age in group I was 42.41±6.86 years, in group II 40.95±7 .32 years and in group III 42.50±5.77 years. There was no statisticallysignificant difference among the three groups with respect to any parameter (p>0.05). Individual group analysis showed significant improvement (p<0.05) in all parameters . CONCLUSIONS: Manual intervertebral foramen opening technique, manual traction, and combination of both techniques were equally effective in decreasing pain, level of disability and improved cervical mobility in patients with cervical radiculopathy.

McKenzie treatment versus mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides for chronic mechanical low back pain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Chronic mechanical low back pain is common among different age groups and genders. Different manual therapy techniques combined with exercise therapy and electrotherapy modalities play an important role in its management. Our objective was to compare the effects of McKenzie extension exercisesprogram (EEP) versus Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glides (SNAGs) for chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP). METHODS: This randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted at Riphah Physical Rehabilitation Centre, Pakistan Railways General Hospital Rawalpindi, from 1(st) July to 31(st) December 2014. The inclusion criteria was patients of both gender and age range 30-70 years with minimum 4 weeks history of CMLBP. A total of 37 patients were screened out as per inclusion criteria and randomly placed into two groups. Twenty patients in group A were treated with Mulligan SNAGs and 17 patients in group B with McKenzie EEP for four weeks at two session per week and single session per day. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Scale (ODI) and lumber Range of Motion (ROM) were used as an assessment tools and were measured at baseline and at the completion 4 weeks intervention. The data was analyzed with SPSS to draw the statistical and clinical significance of both interventions. RESULTS: At the completion of 4 weeks intervention the pre and post statistical analysis revealed that clinically the McKenzie EEP improved pain (mean 9.12 to 1.46) and disability (73.82 to 6.24) slightly more than Mulligan SNAGs (pain: from 8.85 to 2.55, disability 73.75 to 7.05), while the Mulligan SNAGs improved lumbar ROM more effectively than McKenzie EEP in all directions including flexion, extension, side bending and rotation. Statistically there was no significant difference between the effects of two interventions in managing pain and disability, and improving Lumber ROM. CONCLUSION: McKenzie EEP is clinically slightly more effective in the management of pain and disability as compared with Mulligan SNAGs, while Mulligan SNAGs are more effective in the improvement of lumbar ROM as compared with Mechanize EEP in the management of CMLBP.