Practitioner eating disorder detection: The influence of health mindset, thin-ideal internalization, orthorexia and gender role.

AIMS: The current study sought to determine what factors inhibited psychologists, naturopaths and fitness instructors from detecting an eating disorder (ED), and the discipline differences across these factors. METHODS: Participants of the online study were 115 health practitioners who consisted of 35 psychologists, 50 naturopathic and 30 fitness practitioners. A vignette describing a female experiencing a sub-threshold bulimic variant without purging was presented alongside ED mental health literacy items such as assessing one's ability to detect a problem. Additional items examined factors that may inhibit detection, including practitioners' level of: thin-ideal internalization, orthorexia, health or fitness mindset (a newly developed scale measuring health and fitness obsessiveness) and gender role identity. RESULTS: A significant number of naturopaths and fitness instructors (20% and 33.3%, respectively) were found to have elevated orthorexia scores. Similarly, psychologists had the greatest tendency to internalize the thin-ideal (M = 3.60), which was comparable to levels seen in recent research for 20- to 21-year-old females with EDs. The two largest factors inhibiting ED detection were the strength of a health mindset and gender role identity. Practitioners who had higher health mindset scores or who associated with gender identities higher in masculinity traits (ie, either androgynous or masculine gender roles) were more likely to miss detecting an ED. CONCLUSIONS: While many present ED studies focus upon assessing and changing client cognitions, this study emphasizes the need for further research regarding training interventions to address practitioner cognitions and gender role biases, which may in turn improve ED detection.

The perceived knowledge, skill and clinical practice of psychologists, naturopaths and fitness instructors when working with eating disorders.

AIMS: When it comes to working with eating disorders (EDs), few studies have explored: the clinical practice; service provision barriers; and self-perceptions of knowledge/skill and the ability to detect EDs in practice against measured ability to do so, of common health providers including psychologists, naturopaths and fitness instructors. METHODS: Of the 115 participants, 90.4% were female with a mean age of 40.77 years (SD = 10.80 years) and comprised: 35 psychologists, 50 naturopathic and 30 fitness practitioners. Participants completed a 23-item survey measuring clinical practice behaviours including assessment and early intervention services, practitioner service barriers, perceived ED knowledge and skill. RESULTS: Only 1 in 20 indicated using standardized surveys to screen for EDs, with 72% indicating reluctance to universally screen clients, with a key barrier being that ED symptoms were typically not the presenting issue. For practitioners who missed detecting EDs in practice, 53.6% indicated this was because weight fell within the normal range or because the client did not present with an ED so they did not think to screen for one (39.29%). In terms of interventions, most (79%) were providing services to clients with EDs, with over one-third providing weight-loss advice, potentially contributing to a harmful weight-centric/dieting treatment approach. Despite most practitioners delivering services, 85.7% felt unable to treat some clients appropriately, primarily due to a lack of skill (52.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Further training is imperative to improve universal screening and evidence-based early intervention practices, which may be particularly helpful for naturopaths and fitness instructors who more commonly perceived their knowledge to be low.