Validation of a novel partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta device in a swine hemorrhagic shock model: Fine tuning flow to optimize bleeding control and reperfusion injury.

OBJECTIVES: Partial restoration of aortic flow during resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is advocated by some to mitigate distal ischemia. Our laboratory has validated the mechanics and optimal partial REBOA (pREBOA) flow rates using a prototype device. We hypothesize that pREBOA will increase survival when compared with full REBOA (fREBOA) in prolonged nonoperative management of hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: Twenty swine underwent placement of aortic flow probes, zone 1 REBOA placement, and 20% blood volume hemorrhage. They were randomized to either solid organ or abdominal vascular injury. The pREBOA arm (10 swine) underwent full inflation for 10 minutes and then deflation to a flow rate of 0.5 L/min for 2 hours. The fREBOA arm (10 swine) underwent full inflation for 60 minutes, followed by deflation/resuscitation. The primary outcome is survival, and secondary outcomes are serologic/pathologic signs of ischemia-reperfusion injury and quantity of hemorrhage. RESULTS: Two of 10 swine survived in the fREBOA group (2/5 solid organ injury; 0/5 abdominal vascular injury), whereas 7 of 10 swine survived in the pREBOA group (3/5 solid organ injury, 4/5 abdominal vascular injury). Survival was increased (p = 0.03) and hemorrhage was higher in the pREBOA group (solid organ injury, 1.36 ± 0.25 kg vs. 0.70 ± 0.33 kg, p = 0.007; 0.86 ± 0.22 kg vs. 0.71 ± 0.28 kg, not significant). Serum evidence of ischemia was greater with fREBOA, but this was not significant (e.g., lactate, 16.91 ± 3.87 mg/dL vs. 12.96 ± 2.48 mg/dL at 120 minutes, not significant). Swine treated with pREBOA that survived demonstrated trends toward lower alanine aminotransferase, lower potassium, and higher calcium. The potassium was significantly lower in survivors at 60 minutes and 90 minutes time points (5.97 ± 0.60 vs. 7.53 ± 0.90, p = 0.011; 6.67 ± 0.66 vs. 8.15 ± 0.78, p = 0.029). Calcium was significantly higher at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes (8.56 ± 0.66 vs. 7.50 ± 0.40, p = 0.034; 8.63 ± 0.62 vs. 7.15 ± 0.49, p = 0.019; 8.96 ± 0.64 vs. 7.00, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION: Prolonged pREBOA at a moderate distal flow rate provided adequate hemorrhage control, improved survival, and had evidence of decreased ischemic injury versus fREBOA. Prophylactic aggressive calcium supplementation may have utility before and during the reperfusion phase.

Titrate to equilibrate and not exsanguinate! Characterization and validation of a novel partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta catheter in normal and hemorrhagic shock conditions.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a significant advancement in the control of noncompressible truncal hemorrhage. However, its ischemic burden and reperfusion injury following balloon deflation limits its utilization. Partial restoration of aortic flow during REBOA has the potential to balance hemorrhage control and ischemia. This study validates the mechanics, physiology, and optimal partial flow rates using a prototype partial REBOA (pREBOA) device. METHODS: Twenty-five swine underwent placement of aortic flow probes and zone 1 pREBOA. Experiment 1 (N = 5) animals were not injured and assessed the tested the catheters ability to titrate and control flow. Experiment 2 (N = 10) added 20% hemorrhage and either solid organ, or abdominal vascular injury to compare flow rate and rebleeding from injuries. Experiment 3 (N = 10) swine were similarly prepared, hemorrhaged, and underwent pREBOA at set partial flow rates for 2 hours followed by complete deflation for 30 minutes. RESULTS: Balloon volume at minimum flow (mean, 0.09 L/min) was 3.5 mL to 6.0 mL. Half maximal flow was achieved with 56.5% of maximum balloon inflation. Partial REBOA allowed very fine titration of flow rates. Rebleeding occurred at 0.45 L/min to 0.83 L/min. Distal flow of 0.7 L/min had 50% survival, 0.5 had 100% survival, and 0.3 L had 50% survival with mean end lactates of 9.6, 12.6, and 13.3, respectively. There was a trend toward hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia in nonsurvivors. CONCLUSION: The pREBOA device demonstrated a high level of titratability for restoration of aortic flow. An optimal partial flow of 0.5 L/min was effective at hemorrhage control while limiting the burden of ischemic injury, and extending the tolerable duration of zone 1 occlusion. Aggressive calcium supplementation prior to and during partial occlusion and reperfusion may be warranted to prevent hyperkalemic arrest.

Sage wisdom or anecdotal dictum? Equivalent opioid use after open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: Purported benefits of minimally-invasive inguinal hernia repair techniques include less postoperative pain, but objective data is lacking. We analyzed prescribing habits and opiate requirements to provide an objective comparison. METHODOLOGY: Inguinal hernia repairs performed on patients aged 18-65 from October 2016 through February 2018 were examined. Patients with prior opiate use or complicated operative courses were excluded. Discharge prescriptions, morphine milligram equivalents(MME), and additional prescriptions within three months were evaluated. RESULTS: 173 patients met criteria including 90 open(OMR), 34 laparoscopic(TEP), and 49 robotic(RTAPP) repairs. There was no difference in age or gender. There was no difference in average opiate prescriptions(OMR 230 MME, TEP 229 MME, RTAP 208 MME; p = 0.581), percentage prescribed acetaminophen(OMR 96.7%, TEP 97.1%, RTAPP 98.0%; p = 0.910), or percentage prescribed NSAIDs(OMR 43.3%, TEP 44.1%, RTAP 46.9%; p = 0.919). On follow up, there was no difference in repeat opiate prescriptions(OMR 10.0%, TEP 8.8%, RTAPP 8.2%; p = 0.934). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repairs showed no evidence of differing pain medication requirements. The implication that minimally-invasive techniques cause less pain may be inaccurate.