Berberine versus placebo for the prevention of recurrence of colorectal adenoma: a multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprevention of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer remains an important public health goal. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical potential and safety of berberine for prevention of colorectal adenoma recurrence. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was done in seven hospital centres across six provinces in China. Individuals aged 18-75 years who had at least one but no more than six histologically confirmed colorectal adenomas that had undergone complete polypectomy within the 6 months before recruitment were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive berberine (0·3 g twice daily) or placebo tablets via block randomisation (block size of six). Participants were to undergo a first follow-up colonoscopy 1 year after enrolment, and if no colorectal adenomas were detected, a second follow-up colonoscopy at 2 years was planned. The study continued until the last enrolled participant reached the 2-year follow-up point. All participants, investigators, endoscopists, and pathologists were blinded to treatment assignment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the recurrence of adenomas at any follow-up colonoscopy. Analysis was based on modified intention-to-treat, with the full analysis set including all randomised participants who received at least one dose of study medication and who had available efficacy data. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02226185; the trial has ended and this report represents the final analysis. FINDINGS: Between Nov 14, 2014, and Dec 30, 2016, 553 participants were randomly assigned to the berberine group and 555 to the placebo group. The full analysis set consisted of 429 participants in the berberine group and 462 in the placebo group. 155 (36%) participants in the berberine group and 216 (47%) in the placebo group were found to have recurrent adenoma during follow-up (unadjusted relative risk ratio for recurrence 0·77, 95% CI 0·66-0·91; p=0·001). No colorectal cancers were detected during follow-up. The most common adverse event was constipation (six [1%] of 446 patients in the berberine group vs one [<0·5%] of 478 in the placebo group). No serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: Berberine 0·3 g twice daily was safe and effective in reducing the risk of recurrence of colorectal adenoma and could be an option for chemoprevention after polypectomy. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Folic acid prevents the initial occurrence of sporadic colorectal adenoma in Chinese older than 50 years of age: a randomized clinical trial.

Colorectal adenoma (CRA) is the precursor lesion of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several agents have been shown to be effective in the chemoprevention of CRA recurrence, but there has been little research on its primary prevention. Participants older than 50 years with no adenomas were recruited for our study and randomized to receive either 1 mg/day folic acid supplement or treatment without folic acid. After 3 years of follow-up, plasma folate and colonoscopy were evaluated. Seven hundred ninety-one participants (91.98%) completed the study. CRA occurred in 64 (14.88%) participants in the folic acid group and 132 (30.70%) in the control group [unadjusted risk ratio (RR), 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.63; P < 0.01]; left-sided adenoma (unadjusted RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38-0.76; P = 0.001) and advanced CRA (unadjusted RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.81; P = 0.01) were most common. There was no significance difference in the occurrence of three or more adenomas (unadjusted RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.36-1.77; P = 0.38) or right-sided adenoma (unadjusted RR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.00; P = 0.07) between the two groups. Participants with low plasma folate may have a high risk of CRA. In conclusion, primary prevention with 1 mg/day folic acid supplementation could reduce the incidence of CRA, especially left-sided and advanced disease in those with no previous adenomas. People with differing baseline plasma folate levels should be given individualized treatment. Those with low plasma folate should be encouraged to take adequate supplements; plasma folate should be elevated to an effective therapeutic level, which may reduce the incidence of CRA.

[Jinghuaweikang capsules combined with triple therapy in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori associated gastritis and duodenal ulcer and analysis of antibiotic resistance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical study].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the efficacy of Jinghuaweikang capsules plus triple therapy (LACJ) in treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) associated gastritis or duodenal ulcer, compare it with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (LACB) and standard triple therapy (LAC) and analyze the antibiotic sensitivity of gastric mucosal H. pylori strains from the failed patients. METHODS: A total of 565 patients with H. pylori infection were recruited from 11 hospitals from January 2010 to June 2011. There were 336 males and 229 females. They underwent gastroendoscopy examination due to upper gastrointestinal symptoms and had never received H. pylori eradication therapies. Duodenal ulcer patients were divided randomly into LACJ therapy group, LACB therapy group and LAC therapy group while gastritis patients LACJ therapy group and LACB therapy group. Group LAC received lansoprazole 30 mg + amoxicillin 1000 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg, twice a day, for 7 d (d1-7). Group LACJ: LAC therapy plus Jinghuaweikang, 3 capsules, twice a day, for 7 d (d1-7) then Jinghuaweikang, 3 capsules, twice a day, for 14 d (d8-21). Group LACB: LAC plus bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, twice a day, for 7 d (d1-7) and then bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, twice a day, for 14 d (d8-21). All duodenal ulcer patients received lansoprazole (30 mg, once a day) for 14 days after the first 7-day of treatment (d 8-21). At least 28 days after the end of treatment, all patients underwent (13)C urea breath test. Gastric mucosa was collected under endoscopy from the failed patients. The detection technique of gene chip was employed to detect antibiotics resistant gene from mucosa. RESULTS: The eradication rates of duodenal ulcer patients in groups LACJ, LACB and LAC were as follows: per-protocol (PP), 80.2% (77/96), 89.9% (89/99) and 72.2% (70/97) (P = 0.007), intention-to-treat (ITT), 78.6% (77/98), 88.1% (89/101) and 70.0% (70/100) (P = 0.007). No statistical differences existed between groups LACJ and LACB or LAC (all P > 0.05). But there were statistical differences between groups LACB and LAC (both P = 0.002). The eradication rates of PP and ITT of chronic gastritis patients in groups LACJ and LACB were as follows: 75.8% (97/128), 74.6% (97/130) vs 83.8% (109/130), 80.1% (109/136) (both P > 0.05). The symptomatic improvements of abdominal pain, burning and acid reflux of duodenal ulcer patients in group LACJ were higher than those in groups LACB and LAC. There were statistical differences between groups LACJ and LAC (all P < 0.05). The symptomatic improvements of bloating and belching for chronic gastritis patients in group LACJ were higher than those of group LACB. But no significant difference existed between two groups (all P > 0.05). Sixty samples of gastric mucosa were collected from the failed patients. The detection rates of antibiotic-resistant gene to clarithromycin and amoxicillin were 60.0% (36/36) and 18.3% (11/60) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of LACJ for the treatment of H. pylori infection patients is similar to LACB and superior to LAC. And the symptomatic improvement of patients is better than the other two regimens. The main cause of treatment failure is antibiotic resistance of H. pylori strains.