How do I implement an outpatient program for the administration of convalescent plasma for COVID-19?

Convalescent plasma, collected from donors who have recovered from a pathogen of interest, has been used to treat infectious diseases, particularly in times of outbreak, when alternative therapies were unavailable. The COVID-19 pandemic revived interest in the use of convalescent plasma. Large observational studies and clinical trials that were executed during the pandemic provided insight into how to use convalescent plasma, whereby high levels of antibodies against the pathogen of interest and administration early within the time course of the disease are critical for optimal therapeutic effect. Several studies have shown outpatient administration of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to be both safe and effective, preventing clinical progression in patients when administered within the first week of COVID-19. The United States Food and Drug Administration expanded its emergency use authorization (EUA) to allow for the administration of CCP in an outpatient setting in December 2021, at least for immunocompromised patients or those on immunosuppressive therapy. Outpatient transfusion of CCP and infusion of monoclonal antibody therapies for a highly transmissible infectious disease introduces nuanced challenges related to infection prevention. Drawing on our experiences with the clinical and research use of CCP, we describe the logistical considerations and workflow spanning procurement of qualified products, infrastructure, staffing, transfusion, and associated management of adverse events. The purpose of this description is to facilitate the efforts of others intent on establishing outpatient transfusion programs for CCP and other antibody-based therapies.

The impact of environmental ultraviolet exposure on the clinical course of mycosis fungoides.

BACKGROUND: As phototherapy plays an important role in the treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides (MF), it is possible that environmental ultraviolet (UV) exposure affects the natural history of the disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of environmental UV exposure on the clinical course of MF. METHODS: The National Solar Radiation Database was used to identify the top and bottom registries for UV exposure from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database. Incidence and survival were determined. RESULTS: The high-UV cohort had a 30% lower risk of developing MF than did the low-UV cohort (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.41; P < .001). When stratified by stage and race, this difference was appreciable only among those with early-stage disease and white race. There was no difference in survival between the high- and low-UV cohorts (P = .098); however, a small difference was observed among those with early-stage disease and white race, favoring high UV exposure. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design, use of the National Solar Radiation Database as a surrogate for individual sunlight exposure. CONCLUSION: It is possible that environmental solar UV exposure may play a role in controlling early-stage MF among patients with photosensitive features.