Study protocol of a single-arm phase 2 study evaluating the preventive effect of topical hydrocortisone for capecitabine-induced hand-foot syndrome in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (T-CRACC study).

BACKGROUNDS: Clinical evidence of the preventive effectiveness of medium-class topical corticosteroids for capecitabine-induced hand foot syndrome (HFS) is limited. Although the pathogenesis and mechanism of HFS are unclear, inflammatory reactions are thought to be involved in HFS development. This study aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of medium-class topical corticosteroids (hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% topical therapy) for capecitabine-induced HFS in patients with colorectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin. METHODS: This is a single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study. Patients with colorectal cancer scheduled to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin are enrolled, and topical hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% is applied prophylactically in addition to standard moisturizing therapy. The primary endpoint is the incidence of grade ≥ 2 HFS within three months. The secondary endpoints are the time to onset of HFS, rates of dose reduction, schedule delay, discontinuation caused by capecitabine-induced HFS, and other adverse events. All adverse events are evaluated by clinical pharmacists and attending physicians. DISCUSSION: This study is expected to contribute to the establishment of new supportive care for preventing HFS, not only for colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, but also for various cancer patients receiving capecitabine-based chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) as jRCTs031220002. Registered 5 April 2022, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search Protocol version V.1.0, 16 February 2022.

The Conventional Technique Versus the No-touch Isolation Technique for Primary Tumor Resection in Patients With Colon Cancer (JCOG1006): A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Phase III Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This phase III trial evaluated whether the no touch was superior to the conventional in patients with cT3/T4 colon cancer. BACKGROUND: No touch involves ligating blood vessels that feed the primary tumor to limit cancer cell spreading. However, previous studies did not confirm the efficacy of the no touch. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted at 30 Japanese centers. The eligibility criteria were histologically proven colon cancer; clinical classification of T3-4, N0-2, andM0; and patients aged 20 to 80years. Patients were randomized (1:1) to undergo open surgery with conventional or the no touch. Patients with pathological stage III disease received adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: Between January 2011 and November 2015, 853 patients were randomized to the conventional group (427 patients) or the no touch group (426 patients). The 3-year DFS were 77.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73.1%-81.0%] and 76.2% (95% CI 71.9%-80.0%) in the conventional and no touch groups, respectively. The superiority of no touch was not confirmed: hazard ratio for DFS = 1.029 (95% CI 0.800- 1.324; 1-sided P = 0.59). Operative morbidity was observed in 31 of 427 conventional patients (7%) and 26 of 426 no touch patients (6%). All grade adverse events were similar between the conventional and no touch groups. No in-hospital mortality occurred in either group. CONCLUSION: The present study failed to confirm the superiority of the no touch.

Factors affecting R0 resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases: a multicenter prospective observational study by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, R0 resection has been recommended for colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastases confined to the adjacent peritoneum and those with a few metastases to the distant peritoneum. R0 resection for M1c disease has drawn attention in Western countries and is currently considered an acceptable therapeutic option in the US National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. However, clinical factors that affect the choice of R0 resection are unknown. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study was conducted by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Colorectal cancer patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases were enrolled at 28 institutions in Japan from October 2012 to December 2016. To determine factors affecting R0 resection and R1 resection with intended R0 resection, stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed on clinical factors including age, sex, performance status (PS), body mass index, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score, presence of ascites, presence of distant metastases, and primary tumor site. RESULTS: R0/R1 resection was performed in 36 (31/5; 25%) of 146 patients. No distant metastases [odds ratio (OR) 52.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.3-210.1; p < 0.0001], low PCI score (1-6) (OR 20.0; 95% CI 4.8-83.4; p < 0.0001), and high PS (0) (OR 2.40; 95% CI 0.66-8.68; p = 0.18) were independent factors affecting R0/R1 resection. PCI score and PS were also independent factors affecting R0/R1 resection in M1c patients without non-peritoneal distant metastases (n = 59). CONCLUSION: Distant metastases, PCI score, and PS are three factors which affect R0 resection for M1c disease.

Prognostic Impact of R0 Resection and Targeted Therapy for Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Peritoneal Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend R0 resection and targeted therapy, a combination of cytotoxic and molecular targeted agents, such as bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab, for colorectal cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastasis (M1c). While these therapeutic strategies are drawing attention, their efficacy has not been fully examined. METHODS: The study population comprised 248 consecutive M1c patients who were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 1997 to 2013. Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate relationships between overall survival and R0 resection and targeted therapy using Cox proportional hazards regression models. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (3 yOS) was 19.5%, and median survival time (MST) was 16.2 months in 248 M1c patients. R0 resection was performed in 34 patients (14%), yielding a 3-year overall survival (OS) of 48.3% and median survival time (MST) of 29.9 months. Targeted therapy was performed in 54 patients (22%) at least once during the course of treatment, yielding a 3-yr OS of 38.2% and MST of 23.9 months. After adjusting for other key clinical factors, such as the number of organs involved with metastases, performance status, primary tumor site, and extent of peritoneal metastasis, both R0 resection and targeted therapy were independent factors associated with longer OS. Targeted therapy was associated with a significantly longer OS compared with multiple cytotoxic agent therapy [hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval (0.44-0.94); p = 0.02]. CONCLUSIONS: If achievable, R0 resection is a desirable therapeutic strategy for patients with M1c colorectal cancer. Moreover, targeted therapy might be the optimal chemotherapy in this patient population.

Long-Term Outcomes After R0 Resection of Synchronous Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer Without Cytoreductive Surgery or Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for colon cancer recently added the following footnote regarding the therapeutic strategy for peritoneal metastases: "If R0 resection can be achieved, surgical resection of isolated peritoneal disease may be considered at experienced centers." This study investigated the efficacy of R0 resection of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer without cytoreductive surgery or hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single-institution tertiary care cancer center. Among 496 consecutive M1c colorectal cancer patients, R0 resection was achieved for 94 patients (19%). The subjects were 78 consecutive patients with colorectal cancer and simultaneous peritoneal metastasis but no other distant metastases who underwent R0 resection at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 1971 to 2016 (16% of all M1c patients). Overall survival (OS) was investigated, and clinicopathologic variables were analyzed for prognostic significance. RESULTS: No perioperative mortality was noted. The 3-year OS rate was 45%, and the 5-year OS rate was 28.7%. The median survival time was 33.4 months. Notably, 17 patients survived for more than 5 years, and 9 of these patients did not receive any chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed cancer location in the colon and harvesting of 12 or more lymph nodes to be independent factors associated with a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: From the perspective of long-term outcomes and no perioperative mortality, R0 resection of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer, without complete peritonectomy or HIPEC, appeared to be an acceptable therapeutic option for some patients with peritoneal metastasis.

Yokukansan for the treatment of preoperative anxiety and postoperative delirium in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Yokukansan (YKS), a Japanese traditional herbal medicine for neurosis and insomnia, is speculated to be useful for perioperative psychiatric symptoms in cancer patients, but there exists little empirical evidence. This study provides preliminary data about the efficacy, feasibility, and side effects of YKS for the treatment of preoperative anxiety and postoperative delirium in cancer patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of colorectal cancer patients who took YKS for preoperative anxiety, evaluating the following: (1) patient characteristics, (2) feasibility of taking YKS, (3) changes in preoperative anxiety based on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r-anxiety), (4) incidence of postoperative delirium and (5) YKS-related side effects. RESULTS: We reviewed 19 medical records. There was a significant difference between ESAS-r-anxiety scores (P = 0.028) before and after taking YKS, but no difference between CGI scores (P = 0.056). The incidence of postoperative delirium was 5.2% (95% CI = 0.0-14.5). One patient could not complete the course of YKS during the perioperative administration period, but there were no side effects of Grade 2 or worse according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients could safely take YKS before surgery. There was a significant improvement in preoperative anxiety after taking YKS, and the incident rate of postoperative delirium was lower than in previous studies. These results suggest that YKS may be useful for perioperative psychiatric symptoms in cancer patients. Further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate our results.

[A case of metastatic colon cancer to paraaortic lymph nodes and liver treated successfully with oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy].

A 62-year-old female had been operated for sigmoid colon cancer and liver metastasis. We showed our original guideline of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer to the patient. She selected UFT/LV 3 months after operation. Six months after operation,follow-up CT showed a paraaortic lymph node growing to 1.8 cm. We used FOLFIRI regimen for 3 series, but the nodule size did not change. Twelve months after operation, a new metastatic lesion measuring 2.0 cm appeared in the liver and the paraaortic nodule grew to 3.0 cm in size. We used FOLFOX 4 regimen, which had decreased the size of liver metastasis after only 2 series. After 6 series, liver metastasis disappeared completely and the paraaortic nodule was reduced to 1.2 cm. Making a detailed guideline of adjuvant chemotherapy at each hospital is helpful not only for doctors to have more clinical discretion but for patients to have better-informed consent.