Anatomic Location Influences Duration of Local Lidocaine Anesthesia in Dermatologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although the onset and duration of local anesthetics are well-defined, how the anatomic site influences the duration of local anesthetics has not been well characterized in dermatology. OBJECTIVE: To define the duration of local anesthesia by anatomic site. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study. Adult healthy volunteers and patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery were invited to participate. The nose and the shin were chosen to represent highly and poorly vascularized anatomic sites, respectively. A total of 0.5 mL of buffered 1% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine was injected subcutaneously into each anatomic site of each participant. A pinprick test was used to assess adequate anesthesia until return of baseline sensation or visit completion. RESULTS: This study enrolled 25 participants. Time to return of sensation was significantly shorter on the nose compared with the shin ( p < .0001). On the nose, there was an association between male sex and shorter time to return of sensation. CONCLUSION: Time to return of sensation is significantly shorter on the nasal ala compared with the shin, suggesting that patients may regain sensation sooner on highly vascularized sites. Defining the duration of local anesthetics based on anatomic regions is important for treatment planning in dermatologic procedures.

Multidisciplinary team led by internists improves diabetic foot ulceration outcomes a before-after retrospective study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. A multidisciplinary approach has been suggested, but as these patients usually present with various comorbidities, leadership of a multidisciplinary team by internists was initiated. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the leadership of the multidisciplinary team by internists on the outcomes of patients with DFU. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with salvable DFU admitted pre and post introduction of the multidisciplinary team were compared, i.e., a major amputation (above or below the knee), blood stream infection, major medical complications, 30 day mortality, vascular interventions, diabetes control, medication regiments and laboratory results. RESULTS: The cohort included 315 patients, 207 - multidisciplinary pre-period and 108 - multidisciplinary period. During the multidisciplinary period, the rates of major amputations, blood stream infections were found significantly lower than the pre-multidisciplinary period (10% vs. 14%; p = 0.01 and 2% vs. 13%, p = 0.04, respectively). The 30 day mortality rates tended to be lower (5% vs. 11%, p = 0.08). Vascular interventions increased significantly (18% vs. 1%, p<0.01). The diabetes control significantly improved (median glucose levels 163 vs. 185 mg/dl, p = 0.03). Treatment consisting of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, statins) were updated and laboratory results at discharge (albumin, CRP) showed improved disease control. CONCLUSION: The treatment of hospitalized DFU patients by a multidisciplinary team led by internists using a holistic therapeutic approach demonstrated improved clinical outcomes.

Denosumab-associated hypocalcemia: Does gender play a role?

OBJECTIVE: It is well recognized that the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of various diseases may differ between men and women. We recently reported a 7.4% rate of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia in community-dwelling osteoporotic patients. This study sought to investigate the role of gender in this complication. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective community-dwelling cohort. METHOD: The databases of a large health maintenance organization were searched for adult patients treated with denosumab for osteoporosis in 2010-2018. Rates and predictors of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia (serum calcium ≤8.5 mg/mL) were analyzed by gender. RESULTS: The cohort included 1871 women and 134 men. Compared with the women, the men were characterized by older median age (81 vs. 77 years, p = 0.005), higher likelihood to receive denosumab as a first-line treatment (22% vs. 6%, p < 0.001), less treatment with calcium supplements (42% vs. 53%, p = 0.012), and lower median eGFR level (66.1 vs. 79.8 mL/min/1.73m2, p < 0.001). Denosumab-associated hypocalcemia developed in 133 women (7.1%) and 16 men (11.9%) (p = 0.04); the drug was discontinued in 75% and 61%, respectively. The strongest predictors of hypocalcemia in women were levels of pretreatment albumin-adjusted serum calcium (OR 0.08, 95% CI (0.04, 0.14)) and creatinine (OR 2.43, 95% CI (1.45, 4.05)). There were no predictors in men. On propensity matching of 126 men and 126 women, gender was not a predictor of hypocalcemia. CONCLUSION: Denosumab-treated men were significantly older than treated women and had a lower eGFR and more advanced osteoporosis. These findings suggest that selection bias rather than male genderper se underlies the higher rate of denosumab-associated hypocalcemia in men.

Chronic use of oral iron supplements is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with gram-negative bacteremia.

An unabsorbed dietary iron supplementation can modify the colonic microbiota equilibrium and favor the growth of pathogenic strains over barrier strains. Nevertheless, the impact of oral iron supplements (OIS) use on the clinical outcomes of patients with gram-negative bacteremia (GNB) has not been evaluated. To explore the impact of OIS on the outcomes of patients with GNB. A retrospective study conducted in a tertiary hospital including patients with GNB during 2011-2016. The entire cohort was divided into chronic OIS users (study group) and nonusers (control group). The two groups were compared for the study outcomes, septic shock at presentation, length of hospital stay (LOS), and short-term mortality. The study cohort included 232 patients; 44 patients in the study group and 188 in the control one. There was no any significant difference in demographic and comorbidities characteristics between the two groups. Escherichia coli comprised the majority of bacteria (69%), while the urinary tract was the main source of the bacteremia. OIS alone and after adjustment was significantly associated with septic shock at presentation (OR = 2, CI95% [1.03-5], p = 0.04 and OR = 5, CI95% [1.4-15], p = 0.01, respectively). By multivariate analysis, OIS was significantly associated with 30-day mortality (OR = 3, CI95% [1.05-7], p = 0.04), but had no impact on LOS (16 + 23 vs. 12 + 15, p = 0.9). There is a significant association between chronic OIS exposure and increased adverse outcomes in patients with GNB. These findings might have important clinical implications.