Conjunctival Bacteria Flora of Glaucoma Patients During Long-Term Administration of Prostaglandin Analog Drops.

Purpose: To investigate the effects of the long-term use of prostaglandin analogs for glaucoma treatment on the indigenous flora of the conjunctiva. Methods: Bacterial isolates were collected from the conjunctival sacs of 68 patients at Miyata Eye Hospital from February to September 2014, who had been receiving continuous monotherapy with prostaglandin analogs for glaucoma for at least 1 year. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, cefmenoxime, tobramycin, chloramphenicol, and erythromycin against the isolates were measured to determine susceptibility. Results: The positive culture rate in all cases was 90.5% (57/63 eyes), and a total of 79 bacterial strains were isolated. The isolated bacteria included aerobic gram-positive cocci (8% Staphylococcus aureus and 41% Staphylococcus epidermidis), coagulase-negative staphylococci (5%), Streptococcus spp. (1%), Corynebacterium spp. (4%), gram-negative bacteria (4%), and the facultative anaerobe Propionibacterium acnes (33%). The positive culture rates for patients using 0.005% latanoprost (Xa group) and 0.004% travoprost (Tz group) were 88.9% and 92.6%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference in the composition of isolated bacteria between groups. Methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) was significantly more frequently isolated in the Xa group. The antimicrobial susceptibility rates of S. epidermidis were significantly lower in the Xa group for levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and tobramycin. Conclusions: The indigenous flora may be affected by the long-term use of prostaglandin analogs. The higher incidence of MRSE in the Xa group should be considered during the long-term, continuous administration of eye drops, such as in glaucoma treatment.

Evaluation of optic nerve head using a newly developed stereo retinal imaging technique by glaucoma specialist and non-expert-certified orthoptist.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility and interexaminer consistency in analyzing the optic disc parameters using a newly fundus stereoscopic camera, and their correlation with parameters of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II) was also examined. METHODS: This study examined 53 eyes of 53 healthy volunteers (mean age, 21.8 y). Fifty-five eyes of 55 glaucoma patients (mean age, 59.3 y) were also involved. A Nonmyd WX retinal camera was used for stereoscopic fundus imaging. The diagnostic parameters for the optic nerve head analyses were examined under the following conditions: (1) the intraexaminer reproducibility was determined by a certified orthoptist (CO) with 1 year's experience, with the appropriate coefficient of variation in 8 healthy eyes; and (2) the interexaminer consistency of the diagnostic parameters by both glaucoma specialist and CO was examined in 45 healthy eyes and 55 glaucomatous eyes. By subgroup analysis, the healthy eyes were classified into 2 groups based on the degree of myopia, the optic disc of glaucomatous eye was classified into 4 types: focal ischemic, generalized enlargement, myopic, and senile sclerotic, and also classified into 3 stages (early, moderate, and severe) by Hodapp-Anderson-Parrish scale. (3) The correlation of parameters common to Nonmyd WX and HRT II was examined in 18 eyes of randomly selected patients. RESULTS: The results were as follows: (1) Mean coefficient of variation of 2.6% to 17.6%, with volume parameters considerably lower than the other parameters. (2) In both groups, a high or moderate degree of consistency was obtained (r=0.40 to 0.99; P=0.032 to <0.0001), except only the upper rim width in healthy subjects (r=0.28; P=0.137). In particular, good consistency was obtained in healthy eye with >-3 D of myopia, in glaucoma patients with the generalized type of optic disc and severe glaucomatous stage. (3) A strong correlation with HRT II was obtained only in the cup area and the disc area by both specialist and CO (r=0.75 to 0.90; P=0.0003 to <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Our studies indicated that most of the parameters were highly reproducible and consistent, and less difference was found between the results obtained by an experienced glaucoma specialist and a non-expert CO in patients with deep cupping and severe eye, but the examiner needs a clear understanding of the criteria for the rim and the cup.