Association between type 1 diabetes and systemic lupus erythematosus: a Mendelian randomization study.

OBJECTIVES: Observational studies have shown that there is a bidirectional relationship between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); the causality of this association remains elusive and may be affected by confusion and reverse causality. There is also a lack of large-scale randomized controlled trials to verify. Therefore, this Mendelian randomization (MR) study aimed to investigate the causal association between T1D and SLE. METHODS: We aggregated data using publicly available genome-wide association studies (GWAS), all from European populations. Select independent (R2 < 0.001) and closely related to exposure (P < 5 × 10-8) as instrumental variables (IVs). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary method. We also used MR-Egger, the weighted median method, MR-Robust, MR-Lasso, and other methods leveraged as supplements. RESULTS: T1D had a positive causal association with SLE (IVW, odds ratio [OR] = 1.358, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.205 - 1.530; P < 0.001). The causal association was verified in an independent validation set (IVW, OR = 1.137, 95% CI, 1.033 - 1.251; P = 0.001). SLE had a positive causal association with T1D (IVW, OR = 1.108, 95% CI, 1.074 - 1.144; P < 0.001). The causal association was verified in an independent validation set (IVW, OR = 1.085, 95% CI, 1.046 - 1.127; P < 0.001). These results have also been verified by sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSION: The MR analysis results indicated a causal association between T1D and SLE. Therefore, further research is needed to clarify the potential biological mechanism between T1D and SLE. Key Points • Observational studies have shown that there is a bidirectional relationship between T1D and SLE. • We evaluated causal effects between T1D and SLE by Mendelian randomization analyses. • The MR analysis results indicated a causal association between T1D and SLE.

Identifying causality, genetic correlation, priority and pathways of large-scale complex exposures of breast and ovarian cancers.

BACKGROUND: Genetic correlations, causalities and pathways between large-scale complex exposures and ovarian and breast cancers need systematic exploration. METHODS: Mendelian randomisation (MR) and genetic correlation (GC) were used to identify causal biomarkers from 95 cancer-related exposures for risk of breast cancer [BC: oestrogen receptor-positive (ER + BC) and oestrogen receptor-negative (ER - BC) subtypes] and ovarian cancer [OC: high-grade serous (HGSOC), low-grade serous, invasive mucinous (IMOC), endometrioid (EOC) and clear cell (CCOC) subtypes]. RESULTS: Of 31 identified robust risk factors, 16 were new causal biomarkers for BC and OC. Body mass index (BMI), body fat mass (BFM), comparative body size at age 10 (CBS-10), waist circumference (WC) and education attainment were shared risk factors for overall BC and OC. Childhood obesity, BMI, CBS-10, WC, schizophrenia and age at menopause were significantly associated with ER + BC and ER - BC. Omega-6:omega-3 fatty acids, body fat-free mass and basal metabolic rate were positively associated with CCOC and EOC; BFM, linoleic acid, omega-6 fatty acids, CBS-10 and birth weight were significantly associated with IMOC; and body fat percentage, BFM and adiponectin were significantly associated with HGSOC. Both GC and MR identified 13 shared factors. Factors were stratified into five priority levels, and visual causal networks were constructed for future interventions. CONCLUSIONS: With analysis of large-scale exposures for breast and ovarian cancers, causalities, genetic correlations, shared or specific factors, risk factor priority and causal pathways and networks were identified.

Roles for circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids in ischemic stroke and modifiable factors: a Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Available data about the effects of circulating polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on ischemic stroke (IS) and its main risk factors remains limited and conflicting. Therefore, we conducted Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess whether genetically predicted PUFA affected IS, lipids and blood pressure (BP). METHODS: Genetic instruments associated with IS were derived from ISGC Consortium (n = 29,633), with lipids were derived from GLGC(n = 188,577), with BP were derived from Neale Lab(n = 337,000). The inverse-variance weighted method was the main analysis to estimate the effect of exposure on outcome. Sensitivity analyses included principal components analysis, MR-Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode. RESULTS: Per SD increases in serum α-linolenic acid (ALA) were associated with lower IS risk, with odd ratio (OR) of 0.867(0.782,0.961), arachidonic acid (AA) were associated with higher IS risk (OR: 1.053(1.014,1.094)). Likewise, Per SD increases in ALA were associated with the lower-level low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC) (ß:-0.122(- 0.144, - 0.101), - 0.159(- 0.182, - 0.135), - 0.148(- 0.171, - 0.126), respectively), AA were associated with the higher-level of LDL-C, HDL-C and TC (ß:0.045(0.034,0.056), 0.059(0.050,0.067), 0.055(0.046,0.063), respectively). Linoleic acid (LA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) had little or no association with IS, lipids or BP at Bonferroni-corrected significance. Different analytic methods supported these findings. The intercept test of MR-Egger implied no pleiotropy. CONCLUSIONS: High-level plasma ALA was protective for IS but AA was the opposite. LA, EPA, DHA, and DPA had no effects on IS.