Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 33(9): 1717-1723, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28678604

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a novel oral anticoagulant indicated for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate major bleeding (MB) in THR/TKR patients receiving post-operative rivaroxaban. METHODS: Electronic medical records of nearly 10 million US Department of Defense (DoD) beneficiaries were queried from 1 January 2013 through 30 June 2015. Using the validated Cunningham case-finding algorithm, post-surgical MB events in rivaroxaban users were identified and analyzed. The incidence of MB was determined, and descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics and other covariates in those with and without MB. Two additional methods were used to explore and identify bleeding cases that were not considered MB events per the study case-finding algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 12,429 patients received THR and/or TKR surgery, and were post-operatively prescribed rivaroxaban. Nine patients had MB, yielding an incidence proportion of 0.07% (95% CI 0.02-0.13). The alternative case-finding methods found bleeding incidences of 0.46% and 0.21%, though it is not clear whether these are clinical MB cases, since the alternative methods were not validated. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of MB in this retrospective analysis is lower than that observed in the clinical trials of rivaroxaban. Whether this is due to lower real-world MB rates or challenges with case-finding algorithms is unclear.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle
2.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm ; 23(3): 370-381, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28230450

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials impose exclusion criteria that may limit the generalizability of results. OBJECTIVES: To (a) determine the percentage of real-world patients who would qualify for psoriasis randomized controlled trials; (b) ascertain differences between moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients who would be eligible, ineligible, or potentially eligible for clinical trials; and (c) compare their biologic treatment patterns. METHODS: Moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients were identified from the U.S. Department of Defense health care database from January 1, 2008, to October 31, 2013. Eligibility classification for psoriasis trials was based on common trial exclusion criteria involving medical conditions and recent treatment history. Patient characteristics and treatment patterns of 4 biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and ustekinumab) were compared between groups. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio and persistence as continuous time on drug with ≤ 90-day gap between supply times. RESULTS: Among 16,284 qualifying psoriasis patients, 4,677 (28.7%) were medically ineligible, and 8,466 (52.0%) had ineligibility-related treatments that could be stopped prior to trial entry; the latter patients were considered potentially eligible for psoriasis trials. Common reasons for medical ineligibility included malignancies and hematologic disorders; treatment ineligibilities included use of topical corticosteroids and phototherapy. Medically ineligible patients were older and had more comorbidities, while potentially eligible patients were younger and healthier than trial-eligible patients. Most treatment patterns were similar across groups, except that, compared with the trial-eligible group, medically ineligible patients had greater adherence to infliximab and potentially trial-eligible patients had greater adherence and persistence to adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: This large real-world study found that patients who may be ineligible for psoriasis trials differ in important respects (e.g., comorbidities, prior treatments) from their trial-eligible counterparts. Regardless of their differences at baseline, adherence, persistence, and switching of biologic medications are largely similar, with few differences noted among groups. DISCLOSURES: Financial support for this study was provided by Lilly USA. Wu has received research funding from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Coherus Biosciences, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sandoz, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, and he is a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. Malatestinic, Goldblum, Solotkin, Lin, Johnston, and Araujo are employees and/or stock owners of Lilly. Nordstrom, Kistler, and Fraeman are employees of Evidera, which received funding from Lilly to conduct this study. LCDR Hawley is a military service member. This work was prepared as part of her official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that "copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government." Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a U.S. government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. government as part of that person's official duties. Research data were derived from an approved Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia, institutional review board protocol. The views expressed in this work are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the U.S. government. Study concept and design were contributed by Malatestinic and Araujo, along with the other authors. Nordstrom, Kistler, Fraeman, and Sicignano collected the data, and data interpretation was performed by Wu, Lin, and Hawley, along with Malatestinic, Nordstrom, Solotkin, and Araujo. The manuscript was written by Johnston, Malatestinic, Kistler, Wu, and Araujo, along with Nordstrom, Goldblum, Solotkin, Hawley, and Sicignano, and revised by Goldblum, Solotkin, Malatestinic, and Araujo, along with Nordstrom, Wu, Fraeman, Johnston, Hawley, and Sicignano.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Definição da Elegibilidade/métodos , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Ustekinumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 69(5): 541-550.e1, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27913059

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Assessing stroke risk associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation depends on the evaluation of patient characteristics and clinical features. Clinicians must determine that the net clinical benefit from anticoagulation therapy outweighs its risk, namely, bleeding. Risk assessment for stroke is commonly performed by calculating a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure/left ventricular dysfunction, hypertension, ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, aged 65 to 74 years, sex female) score. It is possible that CHA2DS2-VASc scores also have a relationship with the incidence of major bleeding. We examined the relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc scores and major bleeding in rivaroxaban users with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: Electronic medical records of more than 10 million patients from the Department of Defense Military Health System were queried to identify patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who received rivaroxaban from January 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015. Baseline characteristics of the study population were described by CHA2DS2-VASc scores and major bleeding status; major bleeding incidence was evaluated by CHA2DS2-VASc score category and for each CHA2DS2-VASc component. RESULTS: Overall, 44,793 patients met the inclusion criteria for this analysis. The major bleeding incidence rate was 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.69 to 3.00) per 100 person-years. The incidence of major bleeding increased from 0.30 to 5.40 per 100 person-years among patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 to 5 or higher, respectively. Fatal outcomes among patients with major bleeding were positively correlated with CHA2DS2-VASc scores; patients with higher scores had higher mortality rates. The CHA2DS2-VASc component with the highest major bleeding incidence was for vascular disease, 5.69 (95% confidence interval 5.18 to 6.24) per 100 person-years. CONCLUSION: Higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores are associated with increased incidence of major bleeding in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients receiving rivaroxaban.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA