In an era of bilateral funding and changing criteria, when is unilateral cochlear implantation a better option?

BACKGROUND: Funding for paediatric bilateral cochlear implantation became available in Ireland in 2014. Prior to this, children eligible for cochlear implantation received a unilateral implant. OBJECTIVE: To examine the cohort of children who received a unilateral cochlear implant in the 4 year period following bilateral cochlear implantation funding becoming available. METHODS: A clinical audit of all children implanted for the first time between July 2014 and July 2018. The unilaterally implanted children (n = 105) were divided into 3 groups according to whether they met the audiometric thresholds for implantation in neither ear (Group 1), one ear (Group 2) or both ears (Group 3). One year post operative functional outcomes were examined for all 3 groups. RESULTS: All 3 groups showed significant improvements in functional outcomes at 1 year post op. To date, 20% of the unilaterally implanted children have proceeded to get a sequential CI, often where there was no change in audiological status. CONCLUSIONS: The number of children in Groups 1 and 2 highlighted how our decision making around cochlear implantation has changed in recent years. Unilateral cochlear implantation in certain circumstances is good practice, independent of the audiological profile when an experienced multi-disciplinary team (MDT) is involved in the decision making process. Decision making using a holistic model approach is key, including involving the parent/carer and, where appropriate, the child/teenager themselves. A staged bilateral cochlear implant is also a good option, where careful monitoring and support for the first implant has resulted in positive outcomes.

Depth matters - Towards finding an objective neurophysiological measure of behavioral amplitude modulation detection based on neural threshold determination.

With increasing numbers undergoing intervention for hearing impairment at a young age, the clinical need for objective assessment tools of auditory discrimination abilities is growing. Amplitude modulation (AM) sensitivity has been known to be an important factor for speech recognition particularly among cochlear implant (CI) users. It therefore would be useful to develop objective measures of AM detection for future clinical assessment of CI users; this study aimed to verify the feasibility of a neurophysiological approach studying a cohort of normal-hearing participants. The mismatch waveform (MMW) was evaluated as a potential objective measure of AM detection for a low modulation rate (8 Hz). This study also explored the relationship between behavioral AM detection and speech-in-noise recognition. The following measures were obtained for 15 young adults with no known hearing impairment: (1) psychoacoustic sinusoidal AM detection ability for a modulation rate of 8 Hz; (2) neural AM detection thresholds estimated from morphology weighted cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited to various AM depths; and (3) AzBio sentence scores for speech-in-noise recognition. No significant correlations were found between speech recognition and behavioral AM detection measures. Individual neural thresholds were obtained from MMW data and showed significant positive correlations with behavioral AM detection thresholds. Neural thresholds estimated from morphology weighted MMWs provide a novel, objective approach for assessing low-rate AM detection. The findings of this study encourage the continued investigation of the MMW as a neural correlate of low-rate AM detection in larger normal-hearing cohorts and subsequently in clinical cohorts such as cochlear implant users.