Management of inadequate response and adverse effects to dupilumab in atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, skin pain, and sleep disturbances. Currently, dupilumab is the only systemic therapy and biologic medication approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for moderate-to-severe AD in adults and children. There is a sparsity of literature available on determining treatment failure with dupilumab and the next steps health care providers can take to treat AD. Individual goals and quality of life and not just body surface area should be considered when defining treatment failure. Possible confounding dermatoses also should be ruled out. Early identification of dupilumab-induced adverse events is important. For most patients, dupilumab can be continued while treatment for the adverse event is initiated. Adjusting the frequency of dupilumab dosing also may be considered in some circumstances. Adjuvant therapies, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, or phototherapy can be added but the safety and efficacy of these combination treatments are not known at this time.

Dupilumab-Associated Ocular Surface Disease: Clinical Characteristics, Treatment, and Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: A consecutive case series of patients with dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease (DAOSD) that describes common ocular symptoms and signs, proposes a symptom disease severity grading system, and describes treatment strategies of DAOSD patients was evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with concomitant dupilumab-treated atopic dermatitis and DAOSD with ophthalmic evaluation between January 2014 and May 2019 was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (mean age 46 years, M/F: 12/17) with 57 ophthalmic exams were identified. The most common ocular symptoms included irritation/pain (n = 28, 97%), redness (n = 24, 83%), pruritus (n = 18, 62%), discharge (n = 18, 62%), and light sensitivity (n = 6, 21%). The most frequent signs included conjunctival injection (n = 18, 62%), superficial punctate keratitis (n = 16, 55%), and papillary reaction (n = 8, 28%). Topical corticosteroids (TCS) (n = 23, 79%), tacrolimus (n = 6, 21%), and artificial tears (n = 7, 24%) were the most commonly used therapies. Of those with follow-up documentation (n = 21), 20 were noted to have partial or complete response with TCS based on symptoms and reduction of signs. Using our proposed symptom-based grading scale, scaled 1 to 5 based on the presence of common symptoms listed above, 66% (n = 19) requiring topical immunomodulating therapy were found in the 'severe' group (≥3 symptoms) and 17% (n = 5) were found in the 'mild' group (≤2 symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into the commonly presenting ocular signs and symptoms associated with DAOSD and highlights the efficacy of TCS and other immunomodulators in improving symptoms associated with DAOSD. Based on our findings, we propose a symptom-based grading system that can guide nonophthalmic physicians regarding ophthalmology consult.

New and Emerging Biologics for Atopic Dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by complex pathophysiology involving both skin barrier dysfunction and aberrant type 2 inflammation/immune responses. AD can be a debilitating condition that drastically impairs quality of life, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Currently, topical therapies such as corticosteroids and non-steroidal immunomodulatory therapy provide limited efficacy for patients with moderate-to-severe AD; limitations include inadequate response, cutaneous toxicity from overuse, and poor tolerance due to stinging and burning. Historically, the development of targeted therapies has been challenging due to the complex and multifaceted etiology of AD. Recent progress in understanding the immunopathology of AD reinforces the development of newly targeted therapeutics. The successful launch of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-4α receptor subunit, for AD in 2017 spurred the development of a number of biologics targeting novel cytokine and receptor targets that are now in phase II and III of development. This review aims to explore the rationale behind these novel biological therapies and to summarize current clinical studies of these agents.

A survey in uncharted territory: A collaborative study to explore the approach to atopic dermatitis patient management in allopathy and naturopathy.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients frequently use both conventional and complementary medicines for treatment. Allopathic and naturopathic providers may be unaware of each other's approach to AD diagnosis, skin care, and treatment, affecting patient and provider communication, patient safety, and potential for collaborative studies. OBJECTIVE: To identify core commonalities and differences in allopathic and naturopathic approach to AD. METHODS: Thirty allopathic and 21 naturopathic providers completed an 11-question free-text comment survey, covering patient education and evaluation, skin care, and treatment of AD. Qualitative content analysis detected key ideas and concepts, and word cloud analysis provided a quantitative visual representation of recurrent words in each group's responses. RESULTS: All respondents indicated using similar physical features to diagnose AD. In both allopathic and naturopathic fields, the majority of providers did not perform routine testing for AD diagnosis. Skin care with moisturization and "soak-and-seal" bathing practices were routine in both fields. Naturopathic providers heavily emphasized the role of food and diet in AD pathogenesis, education, and management, while allopathic providers indicated little to no role for food and diet in AD. For treatment, allopathic providers favored topical steroids, phototherapy, and immunomodulators, whereas naturopathic providers recommended botanicals, supplements, and other complementary and alternative methods. CONCLUSIONS: Providers should be aware of the differences between allopathic and naturopathic providers and their approach to AD management, particularly concerning the role of food and diet. There may be opportunities to harmonize skin care regimens for patients given similar approach in both fields, and to collaborate further on studies of diet in AD and treatments not yet effectively tested.

Patient-reported outcomes of adalimumab, phototherapy, and placebo in the Vascular Inflammation in Psoriasis Trial: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data about the impact of narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy on patient-reported measures of health-related quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of adalimumab and phototherapy on health-related quality of life. METHODS: We examined patient-reported outcomes from a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01553058). The Dermatology Life Quality Index and EQ-5D-3L were evaluated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: We enrolled 97 patients: 30.9% were female, mean age was 43.5 years (standard deviation, 14.0), and median Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score was 16.7 (interquartile range, 13.9-21.6). At week 12, patients being treated with adalimumab (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-8.17) and phototherapy (OR, 8.83; 95% CI, 2.47-31.57) were more likely to achieve the minimal clinically important difference in the Dermatology Life Quality Index compared with those receiving placebo. There were higher odds of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for the EQ-5D-3L Index score when comparing phototherapy versus placebo (OR, 9.78; 95% CI, 2.99-31.95) and phototherapy versus adalimumab (OR, 4.07; 95% CI, 1.42-11.70). LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, secondary analysis, generalizability. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy and adalimumab both improve skin-related quality of life and overall health-related quality of life compared with placebo in patients with psoriasis; however, patients treated with phototherapy achieved more improvement in overall health-related quality of life compared with patients treated with adalimumab.

Association of Inadequately Controlled Disease and Disease Severity With Patient-Reported Disease Burden in Adults With Atopic Dermatitis.

Importance: Real-world data are limited on the patient-reported burden of adult atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To characterize the patient-reported burden of AD with regard to impact of disease severity and inadequate control in adults from clinical settings. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study using data from 6 academic medical centers in the United States collected by a self-administered internet-based questionnaire, 1519 adult patients with AD were stratified by AD severity as mild or moderate/severe using the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD). Patients with moderate/severe disease using systemic immunomodulators/phototherapy were further stratified as having adequate or inadequate disease control. Strata were compared for all outcomes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included validated measures and stand-alone questions assessing itch (pruritus numerical rating scale; PO-SCORAD itch visual analog scale), pain (numerical rating scale), sleep (PO-SCORAD sleep visual analog scale; sleep interference with function), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and health-related quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index). Results: Among the 1519 adult patients with AD, relative to mild AD (n = 689, 64% women; mean [SD] age, 46.5 [18.0] years), patients with moderate/severe AD (n = 830, 66.8% women; mean [SD] age, 45.1 [16.9] years) reported more severe itching and pain, greater adverse effects on sleep, higher prevalence of anxiety and depression (417 [50.2%] vs 188 [27.3%]), and greater health-related quality-of-life impairment. The 103 patients with moderate/severe AD with inadequate disease control despite treatment with systemic immunomodulators or phototherapy (55.7%) reported higher burdens of itch and sleeping symptoms vs patients with controlled disease including more days per week with itchy skin (5.7 vs 2.7) and higher proportions with itch duration greater than half a day (190 [22.8%] vs 20 [2.9%]). Sleep symptoms included trouble sleeping (3.9 vs 1.1 on the PO-SCORAD VAS), longer sleep latency (38.8 vs 21.6 minutes), more frequent sleep disturbances (2.6 vs 0.4 nights in past week), and greater need for over-the-counter sleep medications (324 [39%] vs 145 [21%]). Conclusions and Relevance: Inadequate disease control was common among patients with moderate/severe AD, and was associated with a higher patient-reported burden than patients with controlled disease. Regardless of disease control, the burden of moderate/severe AD was higher than mild AD, suggesting a need for more effective therapies for moderate/severe disease.

Effect of 2 Psoriasis Treatments on Vascular Inflammation and Novel Inflammatory Cardiovascular Biomarkers: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with dyslipidemia, cardiovascular events, and mortality. We aimed to assess and compare the effect of treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis with adalimumab or phototherapy on vascular inflammation and cardiovascular biomarkers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized, double-blind, trial of adalimumab, phototherapy, and placebo (1:1:1) for 12 weeks, with crossover to adalimumab for 52 weeks total. Outcomes included vascular inflammation by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers of inflammation, insulin resistance, and lipoproteins. Ninety-seven patients were randomized, 92 completed the randomized controlled trial portion; 81 entered the adalimumab extension with 61 completing 52 weeks of adalimumab. There was no difference in change in vascular inflammation at week 12 in the adalimumab group (change compared with placebo, 0.64%; 95% confidence interval, -5.84% to 7.12%) or the phototherapy group (-1.60%; 95% confidence interval, -6.78% to 3.59%) or after 52-week adalimumab treatment (0.02% compared with initiation; 95% confidence interval, -2.85% to 2.90%). Both adalimumab and phototherapy decreased inflammation by serum CRP, interleukin-6. Only adalimumab reduced tumor necrosis factor and glycoprotein acetylation at 12 and 52 weeks. Neither had an impact on metabolic markers (insulin, adiponectin, and leptin). Only phototherapy increased high-density lipoprotein-p at 12 weeks. At 52-week of adalimumab cholesterol efflux and high-density lipoprotein-p were reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab reduced key markers of inflammation including glycoprotein acetylation compared with phototherapy with no effect on glucose metabolism and vascular inflammation, and potential adverse effects on high-density lipoprotein. Glycoprotein acetylation improvement may partially explain the beneficial effects of adalimumab seen in observational studies. Larger studies with more detailed phenotyping of vascular disease should assess the comparative differences in the effects of adalimumab and phototherapy seen in our study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT01866592 and NCT01553058.

When does atopic dermatitis warrant systemic therapy? Recommendations from an expert panel of the International Eczema Council.

BACKGROUND: Although most patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are effectively managed with topical medication, a significant minority require systemic therapy. Guidelines for decision making about advancement to systemic therapy are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To guide those considering use of systemic therapy in AD and provide a framework for evaluation before making this therapeutic decision with the patient. METHODS: A subgroup of the International Eczema Council determined aspects to consider before prescribing systemic therapy. Topics were assigned to expert reviewers who performed a topic-specific literature review, referred to guidelines when available, and provided interpretation and expert opinion. RESULTS: We recommend a systematic and holistic approach to assess patients with severe signs and symptoms of AD and impact on quality of life before systemic therapy. Steps taken before commencing systemic therapy include considering alternate or concomitant diagnoses, avoiding trigger factors, optimizing topical therapy, ensuring adequate patient/caregiver education, treating coexistent infection, assessing the impact on quality of life, and considering phototherapy. LIMITATIONS: Our work is a consensus statement, not a systematic review. CONCLUSION: The decision to start systemic medication should include assessment of severity and quality of life while considering the individual's general health status, psychologic needs, and personal attitudes toward systemic therapies.

Assessing the New and Emerging Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis.

The newer and emerging treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD) focus on blockade of inflammatory cytokines, especially those that derive from T helper cell type 2 (TH2) and are associated with a pathway of immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization. Among the proinflammatory cytokines that have been identified as promising therapeutic targets are chemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on TH2 cells (CRTH2), IgE, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and several monoclonal antibodies that block key cytokine pathways in the innate immune response. Two agents that have been studied in phase III clinical trials are the boronbased phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitor, crisaborole, and dupilumab, an antibody that inhibits the interleukin-4/ IL-13 receptor α chain. Semin Cutan Med Surg 35(supp5):S92-S96.

Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 4. Prevention of disease flares and use of adjunctive therapies and approaches.

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic inflammatory dermatosis that can affect all age groups. This evidence-based guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in its management. In this final section, treatments for flare prevention and adjunctive and complementary therapies and approaches are reviewed. Suggestions on use are given based on available evidence.

Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents.

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, pruritic inflammatory dermatosis that affects up to 25% of children and 2% to 3% of adults. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in atopic dermatitis management and care, providing recommendations based on the available evidence. In this third of 4 sections, treatment of atopic dermatitis with phototherapy and systemic immunomodulators, antimicrobials, and antihistamines is reviewed, including indications for use and the risk-benefit profile of each treatment option.

Are biologics safe in the treatment of atopic dermatitis? A review with a focus on immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

Traditional systemic agents used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) are associated with significant potential toxicities and often do not provide adequate therapeutic responses. Biologic agents hold promise for a more targeted and less toxic approach to AD systemic therapy. Patients with AD, however, may theoretically be at higher risk of developing IgE-mediated reactions to protein-based therapies. We performed a review of publications reporting the use of biologics in the treatment of AD. Of the 261 patients with AD identified who were exposed to a biologic therapy, no type-I immediate hypersensitivity reactions were reported. One infusion reaction occurred with infliximab and two patients had "mild respiratory difficulty" with interferon-gamma. Thrombocytopenia may occur at a higher rate than expected in patients treated with efalizumab. Combined, these data support the safety of biologics in the treatment of AD and the further development of new biologics for this population should be encouraged.

Allergic contact dermatitis from a natural deodorant: a report of 4 cases associated with lichen acid mix allergy.

BACKGROUND: Botanical ingredients used in personal care products are a significant and underreported cause of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate allergic contact dermatitis from a widely-used botanical deodorant. METHODS: We conducted patch testing in four patients who were using the botanical deodorant and were referred to the contact dermatitis clinic; three patients had axillary dermatitis and one had dermatitis of the external ear. RESULTS: All four patients had positive patch test reactions to lichen acid mix and D-usnic acid. Of the three patients who were patch tested to the botanical deodorant, all had positive reactions. LIMITATIONS: We did not test to the specific lichen used in the natural deodorant but rather used our own lichen acid mix and d-usnic acid in addition to testing to the actual product. One of the patients declined to be tested with the natural deodorant, but did test positive to the lichen acid mix and d-usnic acid. CONCLUSION: Personal care products such as deodorants may represent a new route of exposure to lichen extract, a known allergen.

Prevalence of botanical extract allergy in patients with contact dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Botanical extracts are used widely in over-the-counter products. They are primarily added for fragrance and their purported healing properties. Numerous case reports of allergic contact allergy to botanical extracts have been published; however, little is known regarding the prevalence of allergic reactions to botanical extracts. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of allergic patch-test reactions to a collection of botanical extracts in patients referred for patch testing. METHODS: A total of 140 patients were patch-tested to a study tray containing 47 botanical extracts. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) a high-risk group consisting of 21 patients with a clinical diagnosis of contact allergy who were using botanical products and whose contact dermatitis was not fully explained by testing to standard allergens and (2) a control group consisting of 119 patients with no history of botanical extract use and who were being evaluated in a contact dermatitis clinic. RESULTS: Ten of 21 patients (47.6%) in the high-risk group had at least one relevant botanical extract positive reaction. Only 4 patients (3.4%) in the control group had a relevant positive reaction. Four patients in the high-risk group had more than one relevant botanical reaction. Tea tree oil caused the most common relevant positive reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to botanicals was common in this highly selected group of patients. Contact dermatitis patients who use botanical products and whose reactions are not fully explained by standard patch testing may benefit from more extensive patch testing to botanical extracts.

A cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Studies from Europe reveal that a large percentage of patients with atopic dermatitis use some form of complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of their skin disease. There are no studies from the United States that examine the prevalence and types of complementary and alternative medicine use among patients with atopic dermatitis. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use and the patterns of this use among atopic dermatitis patients referred to a university clinic. METHODS: Using a self-administered questionnaire, investigators performed a cross-sectional survey of 70 consecutive patients diagnosed with atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: Of the patients surveyed, 50.4% used some form of complementary and alternative medicine for the management of their skin disease. Common motivating factors were dissatisfaction with conventional treatment and frustration with the chronic nature of the condition. Vitamin supplementation and herbal creams were the most common alternative treatments used. CONCLUSION: The significant percentage of patients seeking alternative care for atopic dermatitis underscores the need for physicians to be familiar with alternative therapies for skin disease.