Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Translational data suggest a potential role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in a subset of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy and safety of HBOT in IBD. METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Embase and CENTRAL to identify studies reporting the efficacy of HBOT in ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. We pooled the response rates for HBOT in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease separately. RESULTS: A total 18 studies were included in the systematic review and 16 in the analysis. The overall response rate of HBOT in ulcerative colitis was 83.24% (95% confidence interval: 61.90-93.82), while the response in Crohn's disease was 81.89 (76.72-86.11). The results of randomized trials for HBOT as adjuvant therapy in ulcerative colitis were conflicting. The complete healing of fistula in fistulizing Crohn's disease was noted 47.64% (22.05-74.54), while partial healing was noted in 34.29% (17.33-56.50%). Most of the adverse events were minor. CONCLUSION: Observational studies suggest benefit of use of HBOT in ulcerative colitis flares and Crohn's disease. However, adequately powered randomized trials are needed to draw a definite conclusion.

Appropriate chemopreventive strategy for anti-tubercular therapy related liver injury is unsettled: Results from a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Role of chemoprophylaxis for prevention of antitubercular therapy-related drug-induced liver injury (ATT-DILI) is uncertain. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials reporting on chemoprophylaxis agents for prevention of ATT-DILI. We included studies evaluating the role of a drug in comparison to controls/placebo. The primary outcome was the occurrence of ATT-DILI. We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) for those arms where at least two studies were available. Additional comparative studies for these arms were also identified. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were identified and seven included in the meta-analysis. The agents used for prevention of ATT-DILI were silymarin/silibinin (4 trials), N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (3 studies), herbal preparations (5 studies) and one study each for cholecalciferol and carnitine. Compared with controls/placebo, the odds of occurrence of hepatotoxicity with NAC was 7 * 10-17 (95% CrI: 2.8 * 10-53, 0.0053) and Silymarin was 0.68 (95% CrI: 0.084, 4.6). NAC had the highest probability of rank 1 (0.99) which was followed by Silymarin (0.004). CONCLUSION: N-acetyl cysteine, but not Silymarin/Silibinin, appears to be beneficial in prevention of ATT-DILI. However, the results were limited by the possible risk of bias in included studies, variable definitions of ATT-DILI and limited number and category of patients.