Predictions of Serum Phosphate Concentration during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Using a Steady-State Mass Balance Model.

INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatemia is common during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), but serum phosphate levels can potentially be maintained during treatment by either intravenous phosphate supplementation or addition of phosphate to renal replacement therapy (RRT) solutions. METHODS: We developed a steady-state phosphate mass balance model to assess the effects of CRRT dose on serum phosphate concentration when using both phosphate-free and phosphate-containing RRT solutions, with emphasis on low CRRT doses. RESULTS: The model predicted that measurements of serum phosphate concentration prior to (initial) and during CRRT (final) together with clinical data on CRRT dose, treatment duration, and phosphate supplementation can determine model patient parameters, that is, both the initial generation rate and clearance of phosphate prior to CRRT. Model parameters were then calculated from average patient data reported in several previous publications with a standard or high CRRT dose. Using representative model parameters for typical patients, predictions were then made of the effect of low CRRT dose on the change in serum phosphate levels after implementation of CRRT. The model predicted that CRRT at a low dose using phosphate-free RRT solutions will limit, but not eliminate, the incidence of hypophosphatemia. Further, the model predicted that CRRT at a low dose will have virtually no influence on the incidence of hyperphosphatemia when using phosphate-containing RRT solutions. CONCLUSIONS: This report identifies the clinical measurements to be used with the proposed model for individualizing the CRRT dose and RRT phosphate concentration to maintain serum phosphate concentrations in a desired range.

Diacerein as adjuvant to diclofenac sodium in osteoarthritis knee.

AIM: To evaluate clinical effectiveness of diacerein as an adjuvant to diclofenac sodium in treatment of Indian patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) knee. METHODS: This is a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled and intention-to-treat study. An initial washout period of 1 week, was followed by 3 months treatment period during which patients were randomly divided to receive either capsule diacerein 50 mg or matched placebo once daily for the first month and twice daily for the next 2 months with diclofenac sodium 75 mg sustained release tablet once daily given to both groups. Patients were observed for one more month, using paracetamol as rescue therapy. Treatment efficacy was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, patient and physician global assessment of OA, daily paracetamol intake. RESULTS: Of 84 patients screened, 74 patients formed the intent-to-treat population (37 patients in each group). At baseline, both groups were comparable and at the third month functional index and pain intensity were better in the diacerein group (VAS 15.33 ± 5.07; WOMAC 15.9 ± 2.40) as compared to the placebo group (VAS 22.83 ± 6.90;WOMAC 36.8 ± 2.92; P < 0.05). When analyzed at the fourth month, improvement persisted in the iacerein group (VAS 14.83 ± 5.16; WOMAC 16 ± 2.5) as compared to placebo group (VAS 33 ± 7.72; WOMAC 48.26 ± 3.5; P < 0.05), demonstrating the carry-over effect of diacerein, which was confirmed by lesser paracetamol consumption in the diacerein group (5.967 ± 0.8087) as compared to the placebo group (12.433 ± 2.128; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Use of diacerein and diclofenac sodium together decreases pain and improves joint function significantly more than diclofenac alone in OA knee.