Intense, Instantaneous, and Shooting Pain During Local Anesthesia for Implant Surgery.

Administration of local anesthetics is daily routine for most dental practitioners. Normally, the effect is achieved, and no adverse effects are seen. In this article, the authors describe the complications of immediate, intense and shooting pain, numbness, and marked pallor of the cheek, which occurred during infiltration of a local anesthetic in buccal vestibule infiltration. The patients moved suddenly because of pain and marked pallor of the cheek near the root of the nose and lower eyelid pallor was observed. The pain was very short and the injection was performed again after a few minutes. Two patients also reported an alteration of vision or paralysis of the extra-ocular muscles and drooping eyelid due to paralysis of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle and signs of numbness in the infraorbital area on the same side as the anesthesia. While 3 patients were also apprehensive and started to scare with heart palpitations, as they did not understand what was happening. Probably the anesthetic solutions were injected into an intravascular artery and passed from the extraosseous branch of posterior superior alveolar artery through to the infraorbital artery, which could produce the clinical signs observed in the present study. At the same time, the inoculation of anesthetic in the artery could be grounds for legal disputes for the dentist. In fact, in the absence of vascular disease, anomalies documented by the dentist, they would, however, respond to professional liability and be liable for damages caused to the patient. In conclusion, despite the fact that this condition requires no treatment, it could lead to the recognition of clinical signs in patient with injection of local anesthesia into the artery. At the same time, the inoculation of anesthetic in the artery could be grounds for legal disputes for the dentist.

Hemostasis control in dental extractions in patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an approach with calcium sulfate.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of calcium sulfate (CaS) as a hemostatic agent after tooth extraction in patients with anticoagulant drug therapy. A total of 30 patients undergoing anticoagulant therapy (22 women and 8 men) with a mean age of 54.6 years (SD = 9.2 years), needing dental extractions, were selected for this study. They were divided into 2 groups, control (group 1) and test (group 2), in a randomized way. In group 1 patients, the postextraction socket was managed with obliterative suture only. Group 2 patients were treated with CaS placed into the postextraction sockets. All the patients did not interrupt the anticoagulant therapy during the dental treatment. The healing pattern was found to be approximately similar in all treatment groups, showing significant improvement at each consecutive visit. However, a statistically significant difference in the adequate hemostasis was evident between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.0056). The use of CaS helped to control the bleeding from inside the socket, producing instantly a very good hemostasis. Further studies are necessary to confirm the simplicity, possibilities, and limits of the proposed procedure.