Triiodothyronine Supplementation in Infants Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) profoundly suppresses circulating thyroid hormone levels in infants. We performed a multicenter randomized placebo controlled trial to determine if triiodothyronine (T3) supplementation improves reduces time to extubation (TTE) in infants after CPB. Infants (n = 220) undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB and stratified into 2 age cohorts: ≤30 days and >30 days to <152 days were randomization to receive either intravenous triiodothyronine or placebo bolus followed by study drug infusion until extubated or at 48 hours, whichever preceded. T3 did not significantly alter the primary endpoint, TTE (hazard ratio for chance of extubation (1.08, 95% CI: 0.82-1.43, P = 0.575) in the entire randomized population with censoring at 21 days. T3 showed no significant effect on TTE (HR 0.82, 95% CI:0.55-1.23, P = 0.341) in the younger subgroup or in the older (HR 1.38, 95% CI:0.95-2.2, P = 0.095). T3 also did not significantly impact TTE during the first 48 hours while T3 levels were maintained (HR 1.371, 95% CI:0.942-1.95, P = 0.099) No significant differences occurred for arrhythmias or other sentinel adverse events in the entire cohort or in the subgroups. This trial showed no significant benefit on TTE in the entire cohort. T3 supplementation appears safe as it did not cause an increase in adverse events. The study implementation and analysis were complicated by marked variability in surgical risk, although risk categories were balanced between treatment groups.

Clinical factors associated with abandonment of a rate-control or a rhythm-control strategy for the management of atrial fibrillation in the AFFIRM study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current study was to determine the clinical factors that were associated with abandonment of a rate-control or a rhythm-control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Although the AFFIRM Study demonstrated that outcomes are similar with a primary strategy of rate-control or rhythm-control for AF, there may be clinical or demographic factors associated with abandonment of the initial treatment strategy. Knowledge of these risk factors would be useful so that patients may be given appropriate initial therapy and, as appropriate, switched to alternative treatments earlier. METHODS: Patients in the AFFIRM Study were subdivided into those who were maintained on their initial treatment strategy versus those who abandoned initial treatment strategy for alternative therapies. We determined the clinical and demographic factors associated with change in initial treatment strategy. RESULTS: At 5 years the original treatment strategy was maintained in 85% of the patients in the rate-control arm versus 62% of those in the rhythm-control arm (P <.0001). Length of the qualifying episode of AF was associated with abandonment of both rhythm-control and rate-control strategies. Antiarrhythmic drug failure before randomization and a history of thyroid disease also were associated with abandonment of rhythm-control. Patients were more likely to maintain rate-control if they already had an implanted pacemaker or if they were older than 75 years, while an ejection fraction <30% was associated with abandonment of the rate-control strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, rhythm-control strategies are abandoned significantly more often than rate-control strategies. Patients with long durations of AF on presentation or previous antiarrhythmic drug failure might be considered for rate-control as initial treatment.