Making the unbearable, bearable: Qualitative examination of patient, family and nurses' perspectives on the role and value of specialist metastatic breast care nurses.

PURPOSE: To examine the role and value of specialist metastatic breast care nurses in Australia from the perspective of metastatic breast care nurses, patients, and family members. Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) is treatable yet incurable, with distinct supportive care needs, yet many of these needs are unmet. METHOD: Diverse sampling methods were used to recruit 10 people with mBC, 5 family members and 10 metastatic breast care nurses. Semi-structured interviews were conducted online or by telephone during August-December 2020, and analysed thematically. RESULTS: The role of the specialist nurse was strongly valued within and across participant groups, with close alignment regarding what was highly valued. Three themes were identified. First, nurses played a vital role in giving voice and visibility to patients with mBC in a healthcare system in which they often felt invisible. Second, nurses combined their clinical and psychosocial skills with a sense of authentic engagement to create a safe space for those with mBC to discuss their feelings, experiences, and topics, especially those that were unlikely to be discussed in their other social and clinical interactions. Finally, nurses supported patients in living as well as possible while managing symptoms, ongoing treatment, and attendant psychosocial impacts of an incurable and life-limiting condition. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the central importance of metastatic breast care nurses in enhancing patient well-being, bridging gaps in care, and offering much-needed support. By addressing patients' emotional, clinical, and social needs, these specialist nurses contribute to a more holistic and compassionate approach to managing mBC.

Unravelling the truth: Examining the evidence for health-related claims made by naturopathic influencers on social media - a retrospective analysis.

Background: Social media platforms are frequently used by the general public to access health information, including information relating to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). The aim of this study was to measure how often naturopathic influencers make evidence-informed recommendations on Instagram, and to examine associations between the level of evidence available or presented, and user engagement. Methods: A retrospective observational study using quantitative content analysis on health-related claims made by naturopathic influencers with 30000 or more followers on Instagram was conducted. Linear regression was used to measure the association between health-related posts and the number of Likes, and Comments. Results: A total of 494 health claims were extracted from eight Instagram accounts, of which 242 (49.0%) were supported by evidence and 34 (6.9%) included a link to evidence supporting the claim. Three naturopathic influencers did not provide any evidence to support the health claims they made on Instagram. Posts with links to evidence had fewer Likes (B=-1343.9, 95% CI=-2424.4 to -263.4, X=-0.1, P=0.02) and fewer Comments (B=-82.0, 95% CI=-145.9 to -18.2, X=-0.2, P=0.01), compared to posts without links to evidence. The most common areas of health were claims relating to 'women's health' (n=94; 19.0%), and 'hair, nail and skin' (n=74; 15.0%). Conclusion: This study is one of the first to look at the evidence available to support health-related claims by naturopathic influencers on Instagram. Our findings indicate that around half of Instagram posts from popular naturopathic influencers with health claims are supported by high-quality evidence.