Ginseng and Ginseng Herbal Formulas for Symptomatic Management of Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: Ginseng has been widely used in fatigue management. However, its efficacy on fatigue remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ginseng and ginseng herbal formulas for fatigue in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Methods: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) databases from inception to July 6, 2022. Outcomes included fatigue severity, quality of life (QoL), and adverse events (AEs). Quality of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. They pooled all included data and performed subgroup analysis by fatigue type, assessment instrument, and ginseng type. Results: The authors included 19 RCTs. Pooled analyses found no significant reduction in fatigue severity with ginseng versus controls (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.82 to 0.11, p = 0.13). In subgroup analysis, there was significant fatigue reduction with the ginseng herbal formula (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.13, p = 0.004) and chronic fatigue (CF) (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.03, p = 0.03) compared to controls. Ginseng produced significant reductions in general (i.e., non-disease-specific) fatigue compared to controls (SMD: -0.48, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.25, p < 0.0001). Ginseng was associated with a trend toward QoL improvement (p = 0.05) and did not increase AEs compared with controls. Effect sizes were small. Conclusion: Ginseng herbal formulas improved fatigue severity compared to controls, especially among patients with CF, but with a small effect size. Rigorous RCTs as well as guidelines for standard ginseng usage are needed to further evaluate the effects of ginseng for fatigue and ensure proper use.

Herbal Formula Shenling Baizhu San for Chronic Diarrhea in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Shenling Baizhu San (SBS), a well-known Chinese medicine herbal formula, has been widely used for treating chronic diarrhea for thousands of years. However, the efficacy and safety of SBS in treating chronic diarrhea have not been fully assessed. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of the herbal formula SBS in symptomatic relief of chronic diarrhea. METHODS: English and Chinese language databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Wanfang Data, and SinoMed electronic databases) were searched through April 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The outcomes in these RCTs included stool frequency, stool consistency, patient-reported satisfaction of chronic diarrhea treatment, quality of life and adverse events. Paired reviewers independently extracted data and conducted qualitative and quantitative analyses. The Cochrane revised risk of bias RoB-2 tool was applied to assess the risk of bias for each trial whereas the RevMan 5.3 software was used for outcomes data synthesis and meta-analysis. Mean difference (MD) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to measure continuous data. The dichotomous data were analyzed via the relative risk (RR) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Fourteen RCTs including 1158 participants (54% males) with chronic diarrhea were included. Shenling Baizhu San combined with or without conventional medicine (CM) was associated with greater patient-reported satisfaction than CM alone. There was no increased risk of adverse events (AEs) during treatment. CONCLUSION: Treatment with SBS was associated with significant improvement in patient-reported satisfaction, irrespective of conventional medicine use. Rigorous and powered RCTs with objective outcome measures are needed to confirm the effects of SBS in specific gastrointestinal disease populations with chronic diarrhea symptoms. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER (PROSPERO): CRD42020178073.

Tibetan herbal pain-relieving plaster for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Tibetan traditional medicine CheeZheng Pain-Relieving Plaster (CZPRP) is frequently used as an over-the-counter external analgesic for musculoskeletal pain; however, its evidence for low back pain (LBP) has not been evaluated. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of CZPRP for both acute, subacute and chronic LBP through a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, CENTRAL, CNKI, CQVIP, and Wanfang databases were searched through April 20, 2020 for randomized controlled trials of CZPRP for LBP. Eligible comparators were placebo, active treatment, or usual care. Clinical outcomes included pain severity, lower back function score, pain-free rate, and adverse events (AEs). Qualitative evaluations were conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tools. Quantitative analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. RESULTS: This study includes 1674 LBP patients from nine clinical studies. Pooled analyses among subjects with acute LBP show 1) significant pain reductions (mean difference -0.84, 95% confidence interval[CI] -1.31, -0.37) in CZPRP plus diclofenac versus diclofenac, 2) significant improvements in lower back function (standard mean difference -1.50, 95% CI -2.16, -0.85) in CZPRP versus diclofenac, and 3) a higher pain-free rate in CZPRP alone (risk ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.16, 1.89; I2 = 61%) or CZPRP plus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (risk ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.14, 2.40; I2 = 0%) versus NSAIDs. However, in a heterogeneous population with mixed LBP subtypes, there was no significant difference in pain outcomes between CZPRP and diclofenac. Additionally, CZPRP use did not increase AEs compared with no CZPRP (p = 0.40). All nine studies are associated with moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CZPRP is associated with improved acute LBP outcomes compared to diclofenac. However, due to the moderate to high risk of bias of the studies, future rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the effects of CZPRP for acute and chronic LBP.

Herbal formula MaZiRenWan (Hemp Seed Pill) for constipation: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in using herbal supplements to treat constipation; however, little evidence exists for their use. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of herbal formula MaZiRenWan (Hemp Seed Pill, HSP) in patients with functional or non-functional constipation. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis METHODS: PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang were searched through April 20, 2020 for randomized trials of HSP versus placebo or medications for all types of constipation. The primary outcomes were complete response rate, complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM), patient-reported satisfactory treatment rate (prSTR), and adverse events (AEs). Clinical data were analyzed using a random-effects model, and the quality of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. RESULTS: This review includes 1681 constipation patients from 17 moderate-to-high risk of bias trials that were conducted in east Asia. Two high-quality trials showed that HSP compared with placebo significantly increased weekly CSBM (mean difference, 0.95; 95% CI: 0.56, 1.35) and had a higher complete response rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.43; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.71) in patients with functional constipation. Low-quality evidence showed significant improvement in prSTR in HSP compared with conventional medications (RR, 1.79; 95% CI: 1.42, 2.25). Additionally, HSP use did not increase AEs compared with no HSP (p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that HSP was effective among Asian patients with functional constipation. Rigorous trials need to be conducted in clinical populations outside of east Asia and in those with non-functional constipation to increase the generalizability of the evidence.