Antenatal telephone support intervention and uterine artery Doppler screening: A qualitative exploration of women׳s views.

OBJECTIVES: to gain insight into low risk nulliparous women׳s experiences of a telephone support intervention (TSI) and TSI with uterine artery Doppler screening (UADS) intervention and their views of the structure of current antenatal care provision. DESIGN: postnatal semi-structured interviews were analysed using a thematic framework approach. The interviews formed a subset of data from a mixed methods study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: participants were 45 low risk nulliparous women who had consented to take part in a randomised controlled trial of two antenatal support interventions; the trial was conducted at a large maternity unit in the North East of England, UK from 2004 to 2007. FINDINGS: most of the women in the study expressed positive views about the telephone support intervention (TSI) and the antenatal care they had received. Uterine artery Doppler screening was acceptable to women but did not feature highly when women recalled their antenatal experiences. Those who viewed their pregnancy as complicated by medical, social or emotional difficulties would have preferred more frequent antenatal visits. Views of antenatal care provision were influenced by women׳s perception of their pregnancy progression and the relationship developed with their midwife. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: although the TSI was viewed positively by women, it was valued most by those who required additional support. The intervention was not a substitute for face to face midwifery visits. Future research is needed to investigate the potential of utilising telephone contact to provide antenatal care for women who have pregnancies complicated by physical, psychological or emotional issues. The findings were consistent with previous evidence to show that the relationship between women and midwives is fundamental to women׳s experience of antenatal care.

Antenatal telephone support intervention with and without uterine artery Doppler screening for low risk nulliparous women: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The number of routine antenatal visits provided to low risk nulliparous women has been reduced in the UK, acknowledging this change in care may result in women being less satisfied with their care and having poorer psychosocial outcomes. The primary aim of the study was to investigate whether the provision of proactive telephone support intervention (TSI) with and without uterine artery Doppler screening (UADS) would reduce the total number of antenatal visits required. A secondary aim was to investigate whether the interventions affected psychological outcomes. METHODS: A three-arm randomised controlled trial involving 840 low risk nulliparous women was conducted at a large maternity unit in North East England. All women received antenatal care in line with current UK guidance. Women in the TSI group (T) received calls from a midwife at 28, 33 and 36 weeks and women in the telephone and Doppler group (T + D) received the TSI and additional UADS at 20 weeks' gestation. The main outcome measure was the total number of scheduled and unscheduled antenatal visits received after 20 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: The median number of unscheduled (n = 2.0), scheduled visits (n = 7.0) and mean number of total visits (n = 8.8) were similar in the three groups. The majority (67%) of additional antenatal visits were made to a Maternity Assessment Unit because of commonly occurring pregnancy complications. Additional TSI+/-UADS was not associated with differences in clinical outcomes, levels of anxiety, social support or satisfaction with care. There were challenges to the successful delivery of the telephone support intervention; 59% of women were contacted at 29 and 33 weeks gestation reducing to 52% of women at 37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Provision of additional telephone support (with or without UADS) in low risk nulliparous women did not reduce the number of unscheduled antenatal visits or reduce anxiety. This study provides a useful insight into the reasons why this client group attend for unscheduled visits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN62354584.