Laser and light therapy for pediatric hair removal: a systematic review.

Hair removal with lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL) is considered safe. However, data on the efficacy and safety of these procedures specifically in the pediatric population remain sparse. To determine the efficacy and safety of lasers and IPL for hair reduction in children and adolescents, a systematic review was conducted of original studies evaluating hair removal with lasers or IPL in patients aged less than 18 years. Primary outcome measures were efficacy and safety of treatment. The literature review yielded 2 retrospective cohort studies and 11 case reports/case series including a total of 71 patients aged 9 months to 17 years. Diagnoses ranged from localized lumbosacral to generalized hypertrichosis. Six treatment modalities were evaluated: alexandrite, Nd:YAG, Q-switched Nd:YAG, ruby, and diode lasers and IPL. Only one of the cohort studies (n = 28), using the ruby laser, provided efficacy data. The results showed a 63% hair loss in 89% of patients after completion of treatment, although partial regrowth was evident during 6 to 32 weeks of follow-up. Most of the case reports and case series (10/11) reported significant hair reduction following laser and IPL treatments. None of the patients experienced scarring or dyspigmentation. Some kind of pain management was necessary in 65% of patients; 25% required general anesthesia. On the basis of the limited available data which consisted primary of case reports and case series, lasers and IPL might be effective for pediatric hair reduction. Recurrence following treatment may be higher in children than adults, and pain control may be a limiting factor.

Clinical and histological evaluation of a dual sequential application of fractional 10,600 nm and 1570 nm lasers, compared to single applications in a porcine model.

The sequential application of fractional ablative/10,600 nm/CO2 followed by 1570 nm non-ablative laser treatment might produce better results than applying either laser treatment alone. However, histological data regarding the safety of this combination is lacking. This study aimed to assess and compare clinical effects, histological tissue damage, and wound healing after monochromatic and sequential fractional laser treatments. In this prospective porcine model study, three adult female pigs were each irradiated using three different wavelengths: (a) monochromatic fractional ablative CO2 laser; (b) monochromatic fractional non-ablative 1570 nm laser; (c) sequential fractional 10,600 nm/CO2 followed by 1570 nm laser treatment. There were six power levels in the monochromatic 1570 nm laser, five in the 10,600 nm/CO2, and five in the sequential treatment. The immediate skin reaction (ISR), crusting and adverse effects, was evaluated across different time points throughout the healing process. Wound biopsies were taken at immediately after (0) and at 3, 7, and 14 days after irradiation. Depth and width of craters, and width of coagulation zone were measured and compared. Similar ISR and crusting score values were obtained following the monochromatic and sequential irradiation in a similar dose-response manner. During 14 days of follow-up, the skin looked intact and non-infected with no signs of necrosis. The mean depth and width of craters were comparable only at the maximal energy level (240 mJ) of CO2 laser, with the coagulation size greater after the sequential treatment. In histology, a similar wound healing was evident. On day 3, crusts were observed above all lesions as was epithelial regeneration. The sequential irradiation with 10,600 nm/CO2 and 1570 nm lasers did not pose any additional risk compared to the risk of each laser alone.

Paradoxical Hypertrichosis Associated with Laser and Light Therapy for Hair Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical hypertrichosis (PH) is an uncommon, poorly understood adverse effect associated with laser or intense pulsed light treatment for hair removal. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine PH prevalence and associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating hair removal with lasers or intense pulsed light. Primary outcome was PH prevalence. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to investigate associations among treatment modality, patients' characteristics, and PH. RESULTS: Included were 9733 patients in two randomized controlled trials and 20 cohort studies (three prospective and 17 retrospective). Pooled PH prevalence was 3% (95% confidence interval 1-6; I2 = 97%). Paradoxical hypertrichosis was associated with a face or neck anatomic location, and occurred in only 0.08% of non-facial/neck cases. Treatment modality and interval between treatments had no effect on the PH rate. There were insufficient data to determine the association between sex and skin type to PH. In three out of four studies, PH gradually improved with continued therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Based primarily on cohort studies, PH occurs in 3% of patients undergoing hair removal with lasers or intense pulsed light, yet rarely outside the facial/neck areas. Treatment modality does not seem to be a contributing factor. Continuation of treatment in areas with PH may be the most appropriate treatment.

Clinical features of genetic cutaneous porphyrias in Israel: A nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND: There are three major types of genetic cutaneous porphyrias (GCP): erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP), variegate porphyria (VP), and hereditary coproporphyria (HCP). Scarce data are available regarding their impact on patients' quality of life in the Mediterranean region. PURPOSE: To describe the cutaneous features of GCP in Israel. METHODS: An established nationwide cohort of patients with GCP diagnosed during 1988-2019 was surveyed by telephone for cutaneous features of GCP. Impact on quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: Of the 95 patients with GCP, 71 (75%) completed the survey (21 HCP; 40 VP; 10 EPP). All EPP patients reported cutaneous symptoms compared with 58% of VP and 5% of HCP (P < .001). Mean age at symptom onset was 7 ± 6 years in EPP and 25 ± 15 years in VP (P < .001). Photosensitivity was the most common symptom in EPP (90%). In VP photosensitivity (52%), blistering (52%) and scarring (74%) were all common symptoms. In both VP and EPP, the dorsal hands/forearms were the most affected regions (≥96%), and in ≥ 78%, symptoms occurred on an almost daily basis. All EPP patients changed their lifestyle due to cutaneous symptoms vs 57% in VP. Major effect on quality of life was observed among EPP patients compared with a moderate effect in VP. No treatment was effective in EPP, while phototherapy and moisturizers were effective in 5 of 7 (71%) VP patients. CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on the cutaneous features of the GCP, which have a substantial effect on patients' quality of life.

Active Tuberculosis in Patients with Psoriasis Receiving Biologic Therapy: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies pose a risk for opportunistic infections, especially for reactivating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the clinical features and mortality rate of active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) in psoriasis patients receiving biologic therapies. METHODS: A systematic review of PubMed, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was performed. Studies describing active TB in patients with psoriasis receiving biologic therapy from inception to May 31, 2018 were included. Clinical data as well as mortality rates were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies were included, evaluating 78 patients with active TB: 11 prospective studies, 13 retrospective, and 27 case reports/series. Most patients (73%) with active TB were male, the mean age was 48 ± 13 years, and 85% were of European or Asian origin. Pre-treatment LTBI screening was negative for 63% of patients. Disease presented in 33% of patients within the first 3 months of treatment, and in 51% within the first 6 months. Most patients (72%) presented with extra-pulmonary TB, and 49% had disseminated disease. The mortality rate was 7%. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of this review are its small sample size and inclusion of case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients develop active TB despite LTBI screening. Clinicians initiating biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis should be aware of the clinical features of active TB in this scenario.

Integrated Cooling-Vacuum-Assisted Non-Fractional 1540-nm Erbium:Glass Laser: A New Modality for the Simultaneous Effective Treatment of Acne Lesions and Scars

Introduction: Acne vulgaris is a common skin disorder with a significant impact on patients' quality of life. There is currently no treatment designated to treat acne lesions and scars concurrently. However, mid-infrared lasers may promote neocollagenesis within atrophic scars, while exerting a beneficial effect on acne lesions. Objectives: To determine the safety and efficacy of an integrated cooling-vacuum-assisted non-fractional 1540-nm Erbium:Glass laser for the treatment of acne lesions and scars. Patients and Methods: Twenty-two patients (8 male, 14 female) with mild-to-moderate acne and moderate-to-severe acne scars were included. Patients were treated using a non-fractional 1540-nm Er:Glass laser (Harmony XL™, Alma Lasers Ltd.). Acne lesions and scars were exposed to 3-4 stacked pulses emitted at a rate of 3Hz for up to two passes per treatment session (spot size, 4 mm; fluence, 400-600 mJ/pulse), receiving overall 3-7 treatments with 2-3-week intervals. Patients were followed-up one and three months following their last treatment. Clinical evaluation including (i) overall aesthetic appearance, (ii) acne lesions, and (iii) acne scars, assessed independently by two dermatologists and graded on a scale of 0 (exacerbation) to 4 (76-100 percent improvement); and (iv) pain perception, adverse effects and patients' satisfaction. Results: All but one patient completed treatment and follow-up and had moderate-to-significant improvement in all outcomes (overall aesthetic appearance, mean 3.9 [1 month] and 3.75 [3 month] improvement; acne lesions, 3.5 [1 month] and 2.3 [3 month] improvement; scarring 4 [1 month] and 4.2 [3 month] improvement). Pain and adverse effects were mild and transient. Patients' mean satisfaction was 4.2. Conclusion: Cooling-vacuum-assisted 1540 nm laser is a safe and effective modality for the simultaneous treatment of acne lesions and scars.

Omalizumab for the Treatment of Solar Urticaria: Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Solar urticaria (SU) is a rare photodermatosis causing a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Although the condition can be controlled with phototherapy and/or a combination therapy of antihistamines and leukotriene antagonist in most patients, a subset of patients require additional therapy with omalizumab; however, efficacy data are sparse. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of omalizumab for treating SU. METHODS: A case series of 5 patients with SU refractory to antihistamine and leukotriene antagonist combination who were treated with omalizumab is described. In addition, a systematic review of studies evaluating patients with SU treated with omalizumab was conducted. The primary outcome was partial/complete clinical response. Secondary outcomes were 10-fold decreases in the baseline minimal urticarial dose and adverse events. RESULTS: Our case series included 5 patients with SU. Monthly omalizumab doses of 150 to 600 mg resulted in clinical improvement in all patients and complete remission in 4. No adverse effects were reported. The systematic review included 22 studies (48 patients). All patients failed to control disease with antihistamines before omalizumab treatment. Patients received omalizumab at monthly doses of 150 to 750 mg over a follow-up period of 4 to 200 weeks. Thirty-eight patients (79%) experienced clinical improvement. Four patients (11%) had mild adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Omalizumab provided clinical benefits in approximately 80% of patients with SU. Patients failing to improve on standard omalizumab doses may benefit from higher monthly dosages.