Management and regulatory supervision of legacy sites and radioactively contaminated lands in Republic of Kazakhstan.

The safe management and disposal of radioactive waste (RW) arising from the nuclear legacy, as well as newly generated RW, are key problems. Their solution will have important implications for nuclear energy development, the introduction of other radiation technologies, and their public perception. In the framework of the cooperation between the Committee of Atomic and Energy Supervision and Control (CAESC) of the Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (DSA), work has been carried out to analyse the current state of nuclear and radiation safety in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The analysis was based on identifying gaps in national legislation and the assessment of corresponding threats in this area. Proposals for their elimination were developed, taking into account international experience and International Atomic Energy Agency recommendations. Analysis of the current situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan showed that at present the RWs are not properly regulated within an up-to-date regulatory framework. Currently, a list of key by-laws is being developed, which will support the provisions of a new law on RW management, and work is underway to adopt the already developed and drafted regulatory documents. Within the framework of the CAESC-DSA cooperation, the priority tasks established for 2021-2024 include the development of regulatory documents for the rehabilitation of uranium heritage sites, site selection for new nuclear facilities, and the management of nuclear materials for certain types of installations and manufactures. Practice has shown the need to use the advanced international experience and common approaches developed internationally, to develop and apply long-term and reliable solutions for the management of RW and nuclear legacy facilities and territories. The solution of these problems concerns not only scientists, technologists, and employers of the nuclear industry, but requires their cooperation with politicians, regulatory authorities, and the general population. The importance of sharing international experience to understand and solve these challenges is highlighted.

Building optimization into the process for decommissioning, remediation of legacy sites and facilities, and management of the wastes arising: results of an international workshop.

The coordinated organisation of decommissioning, remediation of legacy sites and facilities and management of the resultant waste materials has long been recognized as complex, involving technical challenges, safety and security issues, and a wide range of stakeholder interests. To help address these matters, an international workshop was held in November 2019 in Tromsø, jointly organized by the Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority and the Nuclear Energy Agency, in cooperation with the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency. The workshop was the third in series hosted by DSA. The first, in 2015, considered regulatory supervision of legacy sites from recognition to resolution; the second, in 2017, considered the need for an overall process, recognising the links between legacies and the decommissioning of major nuclear installations, the management of contaminated areas and the management of the corresponding radioactive waste. The focus of the Tromsø workshop was on incorporating optimization into that overall process. Attendance included 66 participants from 17 countries, as well as representatives from international organizations. The 29 presentations and associated discussion resulted in a set of recommendations supporting the development of a coherent and practical framework for optimization of decommissioning, legacy site management, and related waste management activities. This paper provides an overview of the presented material and discussion, and provides further information and suggestions for taking forward the recommendations. It is hoped that these ideas, along with the many further inputs from other international organisations and forums, will support the completion of work to implement these recommendations, leading to international guidance on the construction of an overall process for decommissioning and legacy management from a multidisciplinary perspective. That guidance should support holistically optimised management of current projects and help to avoid the future creation of new legacies.

Practical radioecology support in the management and regulatory supervision of legacy sites.

Legacy sites are a global issue. Experience has shown that every legacy site is different and case-specific management and remediation options have to be considered. Each site presents a unique mix of physical, chemical and radiological hazards and the significance of those hazards is likely to change over time. A life-cycle approach to remediation is therefore appropriate, with priority consideration allocated according to the major hazards, as technically determined by reference to policy on protection objectives and the corresponding regulatory requirements. Additionally, consideration will typically need to be given to wider issues as may be raised by stakeholders. The remediation approach also needs to take account of the waste management options on-site or involving off-site management and disposal. Radiological and wider environmental impact assessments are a crucial part of the holistic evaluation of hazards and risks (along with economic and societal impacts), which in turn underpin project planning, regulatory and wider decision making. This paper examines the role of radioecology in the assessment process, its contribution to reduction of scientific uncertainties in modelling ecosystem processes of release, transport and fate of radionuclides and evaluation of potential ensuing impacts on humans and the environment. Relevant examples are presented to illustrate the complexities of the processes in regulatory decision making, the various conditions that significantly affect the final solutions and how radioecology can be used in these situations. Whilst a case-specific approach will usually need to be taken to legacy sites, future remediation and clean-up work can be helpfully informed through sharing of experience from other sites. Continued international collaboration between all parties involved in legacy site management is therefore needed to inform on the development of practical regulatory guidance and to ensure that radioecological research is focussed on addressing the key issues that give rise to uncertainties that challenge regulatory and wider decision making.