An open-label, proof-of-concept study assessing the effects of bromelain-based enzymatic debridement on biofilm and microbial loads in patients with venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

BACKGROUND: Most chronic wounds contain biofilm, and debridement remains the centerpiece of treatment. Enzymatic debridement is an effective tool in removing nonviable tissue, however, there is little evidence supporting its effect on planktonic and biofilm bacteria. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effects of a novel BBD agent on removal of nonviable tissue, biofilm, and microbial loads in patients with chronic ulcers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with DFU or VLU were treated with up to 8 once-daily applications of BBD and then followed for an additional 2 weeks. Punch biopsy specimens were collected and analyzed for biofilm, and fluorescence imaging was used to measure bacterial load. RESULTS: Ten patients completed treatment, and 7 achieved complete debridement within a median of 2 applications (range, 2-8). By the end of the 2-week follow-up period, the mean ± SD reduction in wound area was 35% ± 38. In all 6 patients who were positive for biofilm at baseline, the biofilm was reduced to single individual or no detected microorganisms by the end of treatment. Red fluorescence for Staphylococcus aureus decreased from a mean of 1.09 cm² ± 0.58 before treatment to 0.39 cm² ± 0.25 after treatment. BBD was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data suggest that BBD is safe and that it can be used to effectively debride DFU and VLU, reduce biofilm and planktonic bacterial load, and promote reduction in wound size.

A Literature Review of Pharmacological Agents to Improve Venous Leg Ulcer Healing.

Compression therapy is the gold standard treatment for venous leg ulcers (VLUs); however, with adjunctive pharmacological therapies and poor patient adherence using compressive dressings, clinicians are looking to find the advantage in treating VLUs. This literature review focuses on the efficacy of pharmacological agents, quality of life using agents in addition to compression therapy, and cost effectiveness to indicate the best outcomes for pharmacological treatment of VLUs. The following available venotonic, hemorheologic, and fibrinolytic agents were reviewed for oral management in treating VLUs: pentoxifylline, flavonoids (diosmin, hidrosmin, rutosides, and micronized purified flavonoid fraction, Vasculera), Red-Vine-Leaf-Extract AS 195, Ruscus, Ginkgo biloba, Centella asiatica, Pycnogenol (French maritime pine bark), escin/horse chestnut extract, nutritional supplements (ie, zinc and magnesium, glycosaminoglycans [sulodexide], mesoglycans), Axaven, cilostazol, fibrinolytic enhancers (stanozolol and defibrotide), calcium dobesilate, aspirin, antibiotics (antimicrobials, doxycycline, levamisole), diuretics, cinnarizine, naftazone, and benzarone. Venous leg ulcer pharmacological treatment options were searched in the English language from February 2020 to March 2020 using numerous databases and sites, such as PubMed. Drugs used adjunctively with compression therapy that facilitate healing in long-standing or large VLUs include micronized purified flavonoid fraction, pentoxifylline, sulodexide, and mesoglycan.