Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(4): 801-813, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30612835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of biologic therapies for the management of knee osteoarthritis has increased, despite insufficient evidence of efficacy. Our aim was to complete a systematic review and analysis of reports utilizing the highest level-of-evidence evaluating: (1) platelet-rich plasma injections (PRPs); (2) bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs); (3) adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs); and (4) amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies evaluating PRP injections, BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Of 1009 studies identified within the last 5 years, 123 met inclusion criteria. A comprehensive analysis of all levels-of-evidence was performed, as well as separate analysis on level-of-evidence I studies. Level-of-evidence was determined by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons classification system. RESULTS: Although the majority of PRP reports demonstrated improvements in pain and/or function, others revealed no substantial improvements. Similar findings were noted for BMSCs, ADSCs, and AMSCs. Assessments of BMSC studies yielded majority with positive clinical results, although short-lived. Studies on ADSCs revealed improved clinical outcomes, but equivocal radiographic outcomes. Studies evaluating AMSCs demonstrated improvements in pain and function, and decreased radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Despite some promising early results for PRP, BMSC, ADSC, and AMSC therapies, the majority of level-of-evidence I studies have multiple problems: small sample sizes, potentially inappropriate control cohorts, short-term follow-up, and so on. Despite the limitations, there still appears to be evidence justifying their use for knee osteoarthritis management. More high-level, larger human studies utilizing standardized protocols are needed.


Assuntos
Terapia Biológica , Transplante de Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Células-Tronco Mesenquimais , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Dor/etiologia
2.
Surg Technol Int ; 31: 221-226, 2017 Oct 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044455

RESUMO

Patients suffering from quadriceps muscle weakness secondary to osteoarthritis or after surgeries, such as total knee arthroplasty, appear to benefit from the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), which can improve muscle strength and function, range of motion, exercise capacity, and quality of life. Several modalities exist that deliver this therapy. However, with the ever-increasing demand to improve clinical efficiency and costs, digitalize healthcare, optimize data collection, improve care coordination, and increase patient compliance and engagement, newer devices incorporating technologies that facilitate these demands are emerging. One of these devices, an app-controlled home-based NMES therapy system that allows patients to self-manage their condition and potentially increase adherence to the treatment, incorporates a smartphone-based application which allows a cloud-based portal that feeds real-time patient monitoring to physicians, allowing patients to be supported remotely and given feedback. This device is a step forward in improving both patient care and physician efficiency, as well as decreasing resource utilization, which potentially may reduce healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Braquetes , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Terapia por Exercício/instrumentação , Aplicativos Móveis , Artroplastia do Joelho/reabilitação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Humanos , Debilidade Muscular/terapia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
3.
Surg Technol Int ; 31: 379-383, 2017 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29316598

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Although resident physicians have a critical role in the daily management of patients, based on their limited experiences, they are thought to potentially create inefficiencies in the hospital. With changes set forth by the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program, both teaching and non-teaching hospitals are directly compared on efficiency and outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the state of New York. Specifically, we compared: (1) duration of stay; (2) cost of admission; (3) disposition; and (4) 90-day readmission for elective primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database, 133,489 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2014 were identified. Outcomes assessed included lengths-of-stay and cost of the index admission, disposition, and 90-day readmission. To compare the above outcomes between the hospital systems, mixed effects regression models were used, which were adjusted for patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital, surgeon, and year of surgery. RESULTS: Patients who underwent surgery at teaching hospitals were found to have longer lengths of stay (b=3.4%, p<0.001) and higher costs of admission (b=14.7%; p<0.001). Patients were also more likely to be readmitted within 90 days of discharge (OR=1.64; p<0.001). No differences were found in discharge disposition status for teaching versus non-teaching hospitals (OR=0.92; p=0.081. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that at teaching hospitals, a greater number of resources are needed for primary TKA than at non-teaching hospitals. Therefore, teaching hospitals might be inappropriately reimbursed when compensation is linked to competition on economic and clinical metrics. Furthermore, based on this, optimizing reimbursement might inadvertently come at the expense of resident training and education. While some inefficiencies exist as an inherent part of resident training, limiting learning opportunities to optimize compensation can potentially have greater future consequences.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Hospitais de Ensino , Tempo de Internação , Readmissão do Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/educação , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/economia , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
4.
Surg Technol Int ; 31: 384-388, 2017 Dec 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29316600

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated differences in: 1) total episode payments, 2) probability of hospital readmission, 3) probability of inpatient rehab facility (IRF) and utilization, and 4) probability of skilled nursing care facility (SNF) utilization in patients who had disuse atrophy and underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and either did, or did not, receive preoperative home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Medicare limited dataset for a 5% sample of beneficiaries from 2014 and 2015 to construct episodes-of-care for TKA (DRG-470) patients with disuse atrophy who underwent a TKA during the 30 days prior to hospital admission and 90 days post-discharge. Patients were stratified into those who either did or did not receive pre- and postoperative NMES therapy. An ordinary least square (OLS) model was used to estimate the impact of NMES on total episode. Linear probability models were used to estimate the impact of NMES on SNF or IRF utilization and readmission. RESULTS: A $3,274 reduction in episode payments for patients who used preoperative NMES versus those who did not (p<0.001) was demonstrated. The probability of readmission was 12.7% lower for those who used preoperative NMES therapy versus those who did not (p=0.609). The probability of utilizing IRF and SNF was 56.7% (p=0.061) and 46.4% (p=<0.001) lower for those who used pre- and postoperative NMES versus those who did not, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant reduction in total episode payments and SNF utilization for TKA patients with disuse atrophy who had NMES therapy was demonstrated.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/economia , Artroplastia do Joelho/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Musculares Atróficos , Idoso , Feminino , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Transtornos Musculares Atróficos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Musculares Atróficos/terapia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/economia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/economia , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA