Is ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation Really a Good Alternative for Pediatric Recipients?

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible (ABOi) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been proposed to compensate for donor shortage. To date, few studies have reported detailed ABOi LDLT results in large series of pediatric patients. C4d complement deposition in graft capillaries has been reported to be associated with antibody-mediated rejection in solid organ transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted, comparing clinical outcomes of each of 34 consecutive pediatric ABOi LDLT recipients with those of 2 non-ABOi pairs (n = 68), matched according to pre-transplant diagnostic criteria, age, and date of transplantation. In addition, we studied the C4d immunostaining pattern in 22 ABOi and in 36 non-ABOi recipients whose liver biopsy was performed within the first 4 post-transplant weeks for suspected acute rejection. RESULTS: The incidence of biliary complications was higher in ABOi recipients (p < 0.05), as were the incidence of acute humoral rejection (p < 0.01) and the incidence of retransplantation (p < 0.05). All children who required retransplantation were older than 1 year at the time of ABOi LDLT. Positive C4d immunostaining was observed in 13/22 (59%) ABOi recipients versus 3/36 (8.3%) non-ABOi recipients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ABOi LDLT is a feasible option for pediatric end-stage liver disease but carries increased risks for the recipient, especially for children older than 1 year, even with a specific preparation protocol. C4d immunostaining may be a hallmark of acute humoral rejection in ABOi liver transplantation.

Antenatal Treatment with Intravenous Immunoglobulin to Prevent Gestational Alloimmune Liver Disease: Comparative Effectiveness of 14-Week versus 18-Week Initiation.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal therapy with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may prevent gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of this approach in a large cohort of women at risk for poor pregnancy outcome due to GALD. METHODS: Women with a history of affected offspring were provided antenatal IVIG treatment and data were acquired prospectively from 1997 to 2015. The outcomes of treated pregnancies were compared to those of untreated pregnancies, and the effectiveness of starting at 14 weeks was compared to that of starting at 18 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 188 treated pregnancies in 151 women were analyzed. Only 30% (n = 105) of untreated gestations resulted in healthy offspring as compared to 94% (n = 177) of treated pregnancies (p < 0.0001). Treated gestations of both the 14-week (n = 108) and the 18-week (n = 80) start cohort showed a decreased rate of fetal loss relative to untreated gestations (p < 0.0001). Equivalent outcomes were recorded in the 18-week versus the 14-week start cohort (p > 0.05). Few adverse events or complications of antenatal therapy were recorded. CONCLUSION: Antenatal therapy with high-dose IVIG initiated at either 18 or 14 gestational weeks effectively prevents poor outcome of pregnancies at risk for GALD.

Liver cell transplantation for Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I: update and perspectives.

Liver cell transplantation is an attractive technique to treat liver-based inborn errors of metabolism. The feasibility and efficacy of the procedure has been demonstrated, leading to medium term partial metabolic control of various diseases. Crigler-Najjar is the paradigm of such diseases in that the host liver is lacking one function with an otherwise normal parenchyma. The patient is at permanent risk for irreversible brain damage. The goal of liver cell transplantation is to reduce serum bilirubin levels within safe limits and to alleviate phototherapy requirements to improve quality of life. Preliminary data on Gunn rats, the rodent model of the disease, were encouraging and have led to successful clinical trials. Herein we report on two additional patients and describe the current limits of the technique in terms of durability of the response as compared to alternative therapeutic procedures. We discuss the future developments of the technique and new emerging perspectives.