Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 38(2): 257-261, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31287403

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Contemporary biologic therapies for psoriasis are independently licensed for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Since skin disease generally predates PsA and PsA has a subclinical phase, we investigated the pattern of PsA evolution in psoriasis treated with biologic agents compared to other medications including oral therapy, topical agents or no treatments. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in psoriasis patients with musculoskeletal symptoms referred for rheumatological assessment. Patients who had a final diagnosis of PsA were identified. The frequency and clinical features of PsA were compared for biologics versus the other strategies. RESULTS: Between 2015-18, 203 psoriasis patients were referred for musculoskeletal symptoms with 25 on biologics, 31 on non-biologic systemic therapies and 147 on topical/no therapies. A final diagnosis of PsA was similar in all groups (biologics: 36%; non-biologic systemic treatments: 35.4%; none/local treatments: 37.4%). Most patients had musculoskeletal symptoms before systemic therapy initiation but new onset PsA was evident in 12% (3/25) biologics treated patients, 9.6% (3/31) in non-biologic systemic therapy patients and was significantly higher in patients on topical/no therapy (55/147; 37.4%, p<0.001). Among patients with PsA, none of the patients on biologics exhibited dactylitis compared to 28.6% of other systemic treatments and 48.6% of none/local treatments (p=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: New symptoms and signs leading to PsA diagnosis appear to decrease with systemic treatments. The characteristic PsA dactylitis lesion was not evident in the biologic therapy group.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Produtos Biológicos , Psoríase , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/epidemiologia , Artrite Psoriásica/prevenção & controle , Terapia Biológica , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Psoríase/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Onco Targets Ther ; 9: 4929-35, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27563249

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Antihormonal treatment is an effective therapy in the adjuvant setting. However, musculoskeletal pain is a common adverse effect encountered in patients receiving this treatment. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors for the development of antihormonal treatment-associated musculoskeletal pain (AHAMP) and its impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 78 consecutive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant antihormonal treatment for early-stage breast cancer in an academic medical oncology clinic was conducted. AHAMP was assessed by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). HRQOL was assessed by self-administered short form 36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast subscale surveys. RESULTS: AHAMP was found to be present in 37 (47.7%) patients. In multivariate regression analysis, having a normal body mass index (<30 kg/m(2)), cigarette smoking, and low serum vitamin D level (20 ng/mL) were found to be independent risk factors. In HRQOL assessment, physical and mental scores were found to be significantly lower in patients with joint arthralgia. CONCLUSION: AHAMP has an adverse effect on the quality of life of breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant antihormonal treatment, and assessment of predictive factors is important for identification of patient groups at risk of developing this condition.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA