RESUMO
Background: Sickle cell disease (SCD) continues to pose physical and psychosocial burdens to patients, caregivers and health workers. Stakeholder engagement in the processes of policy making and implementation is increasingly becoming the cornerstone of best practices in healthcare. Aim and Objectives: To engage stakeholders with a view to assessing the knowledge of SCD; ascertain the challenges associated with accessibility and affordability of healthcare services; improve the quality of care, and thereby effect behavioral change through increasing attendance and follow-up of patients in the clinics. Methodology: A Stakeholders' Engagement meeting organized by the Sickle Pan Africa Research Consortium Nigeria Network (SPARC-NEt) was attended by patients, caregivers and members of patient support groups, healthcare providers and management/policymakers. The engagement was through PowerPoint presentations, structured questionnaires and an interactive session. The structured questionnaire assessed the knowledge of stakeholders about SCD; the quality of healthcare services; challenges with access and affordability; and SCD-related government policies. Results: Three hundred and twelve stakeholders attended the engagement meeting. Of the 133 that participated in the study, medical workers were the most represented. The majority had good knowledge of what causes SCD (96.2%) and the best place to get help during SCD crisis (98.5%). However, knowledge of the specific preventive measures of SCD and its crisis was not optimal. In terms of the role of community engagement and education, only about one-quarter of the study participants, 34 (25.6%) knew about their positive role in reducing the prevalence of SCD and alleviating SCD crises. Challenges identified include inadequate healthcare personnel and facilities, delay in obtaining laboratory results, long waiting time in the clinic, poor communication, absence of holistic consultation, uncoordinated healthcare services, high cost of care, ignorance, non-prioritization of SCD by government, lack of multisectoral collaboration and partnership with NGOs and international organizations. Strategies proffered to improve healthcare services include, community/stakeholder engagement and health education, sickle cell daycare services, access to a willing and dedicated multidisciplinary workforce, collaboration with support groups and government policies and programs. Conclusion: There is need for regular stakeholder engagement to improve access to healthcare services for SCD patients in Nigeria.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, where it accounts for substantial morbidity and mortality. Newborn screening is paramount for early diagnosis and enrolment of affected children into a comprehensive care programme. Up to now, this strategy has been greatly impaired in resource-poor countries, because screening methods are technologically and financially intensive; affordable, reliable, and accurate methods are needed. We aimed to test the feasibility of implementing a sickle cell disease screening programme using innovative point-of-care test devices into existing immunisation programmes in primary health-care settings. METHODS: Building on a routine immunisation programme and using existing facilities and staff, we did a prospective feasibility study at five primary health-care centres within Gwagwalada Area Council, Abuja, Nigeria. We systematically screened for sickle cell disease consecutive newborn babies and infants younger than 9 months who presented to immunisation clinics at these five centres, using an ELISA-based point-of care test (HemoTypeSC). A subgroup of consecutive babies who presented to immunisation clinics at the primary health-care centres, whose mothers gave consent, were tested by the HemoTypeSC point-of-care test alongside a different immunoassay-based point-of-care test (SickleSCAN) and the gold standard test, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). FINDINGS: Between July 14, 2017, and Sept 3, 2019, 3603 newborn babies and infants who presented for immunisation were screened for sickle cell disease at five primary health-care centres using the ELISA-based point-of-care test. We identified 51 (1%) children with sickle cell anaemia (HbSS), four (<1%) heterozygous for HbS and HbC (HbSC), 740 (21%) with sickle cell trait (HbAS), 34 (1%) heterozygous for HbA and HbC (HbAC), and 2774 (77%) with normal haemoglobin (HbAA). Of the 55 babies and infants with confirmed sickle cell disease, 41 (75%) were enrolled into a programme for free folic acid and penicillin, of whom 36 (88%) completed three visits over 9 months (median follow-up 226 days [IQR 198-357]). The head-to-head comparison between the two point-of-care tests and HPLC showed concordance between the three testing methods in screening 313 newborn babies, with a specificity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC, and a sensitivity of 100% with HemoTypeSC, 100% with SickleSCAN, and 100% by HPLC. INTERPRETATION: Our pilot study shows that the integration of newborn screening into existing primary health-care immunisation programmes is feasible and can rapidly be implemented with limited resources. Point-of-care tests are reliable and accurate in newborn screening for sickle cell disease. This feasibility study bodes well for the care of patients with sickle cell disease in resource-poor countries. FUNDING: Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Imperial College London Wellcome Trust Centre for Global Health Research, and Richard and Susan Kiphart Family Foundation.