RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that progresses after treatment with sorafenib. Cabozantinib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinase receptors, recently showed improved overall survival (OS) compared with placebo in sorafenib-pretreated patients with advanced HCC in the CELESTIAL trial. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib for second-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC from a US healthcare system perspective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cost and utility data were extracted from the CELESTIAL trial and used to determine the cost-effectiveness of cabozantinib compared with placebo plus best supportive care. The main outcome of this study was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained by using cabozantinib compared with placebo plus best supportive care in sorafenib-pretreated HCC. RESULTS: In the base-case analysis using data from the CELESTIAL trial, the incremental QALY and ICER were 0.067 and $1,040,675 for cabozantinib compared with placebo and best supportive care. OS reported in the CELESTIAL trial (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63-0.92) had the strongest association with the ICER. In one-way sensitivity analyses, there were no scenarios in which cabozantinib was cost-effective. In a cost-threshold analysis, cabozantinib would have to be priced at least $50 per pill to be cost-effective considering a willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY. Although the CELESTIAL trial demonstrated that cabozantinib improves OS compared with placebo in patients with HCC that progresses after treatment with sorafenib, our analysis shows that cabozantinib is not a cost-effective therapy in this scenario. CONCLUSIONS: At current costs, cabozantinib is not cost-effective for second-line therapy of HCC in the United States.
Assuntos
Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Anilidas/economia , Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Simulação por Computador , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Custos de Medicamentos , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Seleção de Pacientes , Placebos/administração & dosagem , Placebos/efeitos adversos , Placebos/economia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/economia , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/economia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sorafenibe/farmacologia , Sorafenibe/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
The aging of the population is a global challenge. The number of older adults is rapidly growing, leading to an increase in the prevalence of noncommunicable diseases associated with aging, such as cancer. Worldwide, older adults account for approximately half of all cancer cases, and this proportion is projected to increase globally. Furthermore, the majority of older adults live in less developed regions, where health systems are generally ill-equipped to provide care for complex chronic conditions. Worldwide, there is paucity of geriatric training, and most of the oncology workforce lacks the skills and knowledge to provide comprehensive care for older patients. Various initiatives aimed at providing adequate clinical care for older adults, increasing the geriatric skills and knowledge of healthcare professionals, and developing geriatric oncology research, have been successfully implemented. However, most developments in geriatric oncology have taken place in high-income countries, and there are still large inequalities in the availability of clinical, educational, and research initiatives across different regions of the world. This article provides an overview of geriatric oncology initiatives in Asia, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, Latin America, and the United States and Canada. Understanding the achievements and challenges of geriatric oncology around the world, and fostering international collaboration in research and training are essential for improving the care of all older adults with cancer.
Assuntos
Geriatria/tendências , Oncologia/tendências , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Medicina Clínica/tendências , Geriatria/educação , Saúde Global/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Oncologia/educação , Mortalidade/tendênciasRESUMO
Cancer is one of the major non-communicable diseases posing a threat to world health. Unfortunately, improvements in socioeconomic conditions are usually associated with increased cancer incidence. In this Commission, we focus on China, India, and Russia, which share rapidly rising cancer incidence and have cancer mortality rates that are nearly twice as high as in the UK or the USA, vast geographies, growing economies, ageing populations, increasingly westernised lifestyles, relatively disenfranchised subpopulations, serious contamination of the environment, and uncontrolled cancer-causing communicable infections. We describe the overall state of health and cancer control in each country and additional specific issues for consideration: for China, access to care, contamination of the environment, and cancer fatalism and traditional medicine; for India, affordability of care, provision of adequate health personnel, and sociocultural barriers to cancer control; and for Russia, monitoring of the burden of cancer, societal attitudes towards cancer prevention, effects of inequitable treatment and access to medicine, and a need for improved international engagement.