Can motor imagery and hypnotic susceptibility explain Conversion Disorder with motor symptoms?

Marked distortions in sense of agency can be induced by hypnosis in susceptible individuals, including alterations in subjective awareness of movement initiation and control. These distortions, with associated disability, are similar to those experienced with Conversion Disorder (CD), an observation that has led to the hypothesis that hypnosis and CD share causal mechanisms. The purpose of this review is to explore the relationships among motor imagery (MI), hypnotic susceptibility, and CD, then to propose how MI ability may contribute to hypnotic responding and CD. Studies employing subjective assessments of mental imagery have found little association between imagery abilities and hypnotic susceptibility. A positive association between imagery abilities and hypnotic susceptibility becomes apparent when objective measures of imagery ability are employed. A candidate mechanism to explain motor responses during hypnosis is kinaesthetic MI, which engages a strategy that involves proprioception or the "feel" of movement when no movement occurs. Motor suppression imagery (MSI), a strategy involving inhibition of movement, may provide an alternate objective measurable phenomenon that underlies both hypnotic susceptibility and CD. Evidence to date supports the idea that there may be a positive association between kinaesthetic MI ability and hypnotic susceptibility. Additional evidence supports a positive association between hypnotic susceptibility and CD. Disturbances in kinaesthetic MI performance in CD patients indicate that MI mechanisms may also underlie CD symptoms. Further investigation of the above relationships is warranted to explain these phenomena, and establish theoretical explanations underlying sense of agency.

Corticomotor excitability of arm muscles modulates according to static position and orientation of the upper limb.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how multi-joint changes in static upper limb posture impact the corticomotor excitability of the posterior deltoid (PD) and biceps brachii (BIC), and evaluated whether postural variations in excitability related directly to changes in target muscle length. METHODS: The amplitude of individual motor evoked potentials (MEPs) was evaluated in each of thirteen different static postures. Four functional postures were investigated that varied in shoulder and elbow angle, while the forearm was positioned in each of three orientations. Posture-related changes in muscle lengths were assessed using a biomechanical arm model. Additionally, M-waves were evoked in the BIC in each of three forearm orientations to assess the impact of posture on recorded signal characteristics. RESULTS: BIC-MEP amplitudes were altered by shoulder and elbow posture, and demonstrated robust changes according to forearm orientation. Observed changes in BIC-MEP amplitudes exceeded those of the M-waves. PD-MEP amplitudes changed predominantly with shoulder posture, but were not completely independent of influence from forearm orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence that overall corticomotor excitability can be modulated according to multi-joint upper limb posture. SIGNIFICANCE: The ability to alter motor pathway excitability using static limb posture suggests the importance of posture selection during rehabilitation aimed at retraining individual muscle recruitment and/or overall coordination patterns.

Non-invasive brain stimulation enhances fine motor control of the hemiparetic ankle: implications for rehabilitation.

We set out to answer two questions with this study: 1. Can stroke patients improve voluntary control of their paretic ankle by practising a visuo-motor ankle-tracking task? 2. Are practice effects enhanced with non-invasive brain stimulation? A carefully selected sample of chronic stroke patients able to perform the experimental task attended three data collection sessions. Facilitatory transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) was applied in a random order over the lower limb primary motor cortex of the lesioned hemisphere or the non-lesioned hemisphere or sham stimulation was delivered over the lesioned hemisphere. In each session, tDCS was applied as patients practiced tracking a sinusoidal waveform for 15 min using dorsiflexion-plantarflexion movements of their paretic ankle. The difference in tracking error prior to, and after, the 15 min of practice was calculated. A practice effect was revealed following sham stimulation, and this effect was enhanced with tDCS applied over the lesioned hemisphere. The practice effect observed following sham stimulation was eliminated by tDCS applied over the non-lesioned hemisphere. The study provides the first evidence that non-invasive brain stimulation applied to the lesioned motor cortex of moderate- to well-recovered stroke patients enhances voluntary control of the paretic ankle. The results provide a basis for examining whether this enhanced ankle control can be induced in patients with greater impairments and whether enhanced control of a single or multiple lower limb joints improves hemiparetic gait patterns.

Cortical stimulation as an adjuvant to upper limb rehabilitation after stroke.

Recovery of upper limb function after stroke remains a clinical challenge in rehabilitation. New insights into the role of activity-dependent motor recovery have guided clinicians to develop novel task-oriented therapies that are effective in reducing functional limitations in hand use after stroke. A number of brain-stimulation techniques have been examined as therapeutic adjuvants applied to enhance functional outcomes. Cortical stimulation with the use of either noninvasive techniques or implanted technology has shown some promise as an adjuvant therapy but has yet to be supported in well-designed clinical trials. In this article, we review the physiology of neural plasticity and of cortical stimulation. Laboratory studies and early clinical trials of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and epidural cortical stimulation are reported. Cortical stimulation may have a role in facilitating motor recovery after stroke, but a better understanding of the physics of cortical stimulation, biological response to stimulation, effective stimulation protocols, and proper patient selection is needed.

Focal and bi-directional modulation of lower limb motor cortex using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.

BACKGROUND: Because we are interested in non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation as an adjuvant to post-stroke walking therapy, we applied direct current stimulation (tDCS) preferentially to either the left or right lower limb motor cortex (M1) in two separate sessions and assessed the resulting modulation in both cortices. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that tDCS applied preferentially to one lower limb M1 of healthy subjects would induce between-hemisphere opposite sign modulation. METHODS: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with the coil offset 2 cm either side of vertex was used to assess the percent change in rectified motor evoked potential (MEP) area recorded bilaterally from vastus lateralis (VL) and tibialis anterior (TA) of 10 subjects during weak tonic contraction. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed an up-regulation of the target cortex and a down-regulation of the non-target cortex (p = 0.001) and no effects of hemisphere (left, right) or muscle (TA, VL). Significant modulation was evident in 78% of VL and TA muscles (all p < 0.05). Excitability increased in 60%, but decreased in 18%. For 43% when excitability increased, a simultaneous decrease in excitability was evident in homologous muscle responses providing support for our hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate a modest effectiveness and focality of anodal tDCS when applied to lower limb M1, suggesting in a human model that the strength and depth of polarizing cortical currents induced by tDCS likely depend on inter-individual differences in the electrical properties of superficial brain structures.