Spirituality moderates the relationship between cancer caregiver burden and depression.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer has become a chronic disease that requires a considerable amount of informal caregiving, often quite burdensome to family caregivers. However, the influence of spirituality on the caregivers' burden and mental health outcomes has been understudied. This study was to examine how caregiver burden, spirituality, and depression change during cancer treatment and investigate the moderating role of spirituality in the relationship between caregiver burden and depression for a sample of caregivers of persons with cancer. METHODS: This secondary analysis used a longitudinal design employing 3 waves of data collection (at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months). Family caregivers completed the Caregiver Reaction Assessment, Spiritual Perspective Scale, and the PROMIS® depression measure. Linear mixed model analyses were used, controlling for pertinent covariates. RESULTS: Spirituality, total caregiver burden, and depression remained stable over 6 months. More than 30% of the caregivers had mild to severe depressive symptoms at 3 time points. There was evidence of overall burden influencing depression. Of note was a protective effect of caregivers' spirituality on the relationship between depression and caregiver burden over time (b = -1.35, p = .015). The lower the spirituality, the stronger the relationship between depression and burden, especially regarding subscales of schedule burden, financial burden, and lack of family support. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Spirituality was a significant resource for coping with caregiving challenges. This study suggests that comprehensive screening and spiritual care for cancer caregivers may improve their cancer caregiving experience and possibly influence the care recipients' health.

Cross-Sectional Study of the Frequency and Severity of Traumatic Childbirth Events and How They Affect Maternity Care Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and severity of traumatic childbirth events (TCEs) and how they affected the professional practice and personal lives of maternity care clinicians, including registered nurses (RNs), certified nurse-midwives, attending physicians, and resident physicians. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional study. SETTING: Maternity units across five hospitals in the Baltimore metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Maternity care clinicians (N = 160) including RNs (n = 104), certified nurse-midwives (n = 17), attending physicians (n = 28), and resident physicians (n = 11). METHODS: Participants completed an online survey to measure the frequency and severity of TCEs and how they affect participants' professional practice and personal lives. We used descriptive statistics to characterize maternity care clinicians and bivariate analysis and linear regression to examine relationships. RESULTS: Most participants were women (92.5%), White (62.5%), between the ages of 21 and 54 years (89.4%), RNs (65.0%), and employed full-time (79.2%). Shoulder dystocia was the most frequently observed TCE (90.6%), and maternal death was the most severe TCE (M = 4.82, SD = 0.54). Attending physicians (50.0%) reported a significantly greater frequency of exposure to TCEs than the other participants, χ2(6) = 23.8 (n = 159), p <. 001. The frequency of TCEs had a significant medium correlation with perceived effect on professional practice, r(154) = 0.415, p < .001, and personal life, r(155) = 0.386, p < .001. Perception of severity was strongly associated with professional practice, ß = 0.52, p < .001, and personal life, ß = 0.46, p < .001. CONCLUSION: If severe, TCE exposure can affect the professional practice and personal life of maternity care clinicians.

Spirituality among family caregivers of cancer patients: The Spiritual Perspective Scale.

Spirituality is a critical resource for family caregivers of patients with cancer. However, studies on spirituality are hampered because measures of spirituality lack consistency and have not been validated in cancer caregivers. This study examined the validity of the Spiritual Perspective Scale (SPS) among cancer caregivers and explored whether measurement bias may influence differences in spirituality across caregiver and patient characteristics. In this secondary analysis, 124 caregivers of cancer patients were used to evaluate the validity of the 10-item SPS. A multiple indicators multiple causes model was applied to explore differences in the association between a latent spirituality factor and characteristics of caregivers and patients. Overall reliability of the SPS was adequate (Cronbach's α = .95). The SPS scores were predictive of higher meaning and purpose (r = .32, p = .004) and lower depression (r = -.22, p = .046) at 3-month follow-up. Construct validity of the SPS with a single-factor structure was supported in cancer caregivers. Adjusting for a direct effect of race did not alter the pattern of results, and caregivers who were older, female, ethnic minorities, less-educated, affiliated with a religion, and who provided care to another individual in addition to the patient had greater levels of spirituality. This study provides evidence for psychometric validation of the SPS in cancer caregivers. Understanding differences in caregivers' spirituality by using the SPS with psychometrically acceptable properties and minimal measurement bias deserves more attention to optimize spirituality assessment and support in cancer caregiving.