RESUMO
The SF-Abs, RFQ-EPR, and RFQ-Möss data on the R2 reconstitution reaction are all consistent with the mechanism of Scheme I, in which the intermediate X is the immediate precursor to the product cofactor, and illustrate how the continuous SF approach and the discontinuous RFQ methods can be complementary. Given the inherent differences in the methods, it should not be taken for granted that data from the two will be consistent. A number of problems can be associated with the RFQ approach. For example, isopentane could conceivably interfere with or alter the chemistry to be studied. A second potential problem involves temperature-dependent equilibria among different intermediate species. This problem has been encountered by Dooley et al. with the 6-hydroxydopa-requiring protein, plasma amine oxidase and was previously observed with the adenosylcobalamin-dependent ribonucleotide reductase by Blakley and co-workers. This potential complication should be considered when discrepancies arise between SF and RFQ data and in low temperature structural studies of reactive intermediates in general. Each of the three methods employed can yield time-resolved quantitation of reaction components. In this regard, SF-Abs has the disadvantage of poor resolution, such that quantitation of individual components most often requires sophisticated mathematical analysis. Obvious advantages to the RFQ-Möss method are the presence of an internal standard (the known amount of 57Fe being proportional to the total absorption area) and the spectroscopic activity of all reaction components which contain iron. In our hands, quantitation by RFQ-EPR was most problematic and least reproducible. This irreproducibility most likely relates to heterogeneity among samples in terms of volume and density. As discussed in detail by Ballou and Palmer, the packing factor, which relates to the fraction of a sample made up by the reaction solution (the remainder being frozen isopentane), is dependent on the investigator. Given this caveat, it is not surprising that the RFQ-EPR data had the greatest uncertainty in our hands. Placing a chemically unreactive, EPR active standard in each reaction mixture could help alleviate this problem. Time-resolved Möss methods can be extremely powerful if excellent, nonoverlapping reference spectra of starting materials, products, and intermediates are available. All of the iron centers can be examined simultaneously. The problems associated with Möss arise from its extreme insensitivity. It takes millimolar solutions of proteins and several days for data collection of each time point.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)