Assuntos
Alérgenos/imunologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Mau Uso de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoensaio/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunoensaio/normas , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Estudos Transversais , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Imunoglobulina E/imunologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Washington/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Multiple practice guidelines discourage indiscriminate use of broad panels of allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) tests due to increased risk of false positives and misinterpretation of results. We provide an analytical framework to identify specialty-specific differences in ordering patterns and effectiveness, which can be used to improve test utilization. METHODS: Test results from a tertiary pediatric hospital were analyzed by ordering specialty to evaluate size of allergen workups. Positivity rates were analyzed to determine effectiveness in selecting tests with high positive pretest probabilities. Laboratory test menu components were also evaluated. RESULTS: Our findings demonstrate 29% of sIgE tests are ordered as part of broad workups (>20 sIgE tests/date of service) contrary to the recommended testing approach. Detailed descriptions of ordering patterns and positivity rates are provided. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a framework for using a cross-sectional analytical approach to assess test utilization patterns and evaluate components of laboratory testing menus.