Guidelines for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis in Children: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous guidelines have been published for atopic dermatitis management in children in recent years. To date, the quality of the newest guidelines has not been appraised. This study aimed to identify and evaluate guidelines for the management of atopic dermatitis in children. METHODS: We reviewed the literature retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, ScienceDirect, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, and guidelines websites. Search period from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021. The following keywords were used for searching: "atopic dermatitis," "atopic eczema," "eczema," "guideline," and "consensus." The quality of the guidelines was assessed by two assessors using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument independently, and domain scores >60% were considered to have sufficient quality. The guideline recommendations were reviewed. RESULTS: Nineteen guidelines were included in the study. Three guidelines had a graded A level, which was recommended for use in practice. Eleven guidelines had a graded B level, which was recommended for use in revision. The remaining five guidelines were rated with C level, which was not recommended. The average score of six domains of AGREE II was 64.76%, 48.53%, 42.35%, 73.83%, 32.23%, and 70.17%, respectively. A consistency test showed an intraclass correlation coefficient range of 0.497 (95% CI: 0.105, 0.705) to 0.970 (95% CI: 0.93, 0.987) based on the two assessors' test results for the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Most guidelines were recommended for use with revision. No significant changes were observed in the primary management of atopic dermatitis in children compared to previous evidence. New biological agents and complementary alternative medicine are increasingly available, but the evidence for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children is still limited.

ProjectFlow: a configurable workflow management application for point of care research.

OBJECTIVE: To best meet our point-of-care research (POC-R) needs, we developed ProjectFlow, a configurable, clinical research workflow management application. In this article, we describe ProjectFlow and how it is used to manage study processes for the Diuretic Comparison Project (DCP) and the Research Precision Oncology Program (RePOP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated health care system in the United States. ProjectFlow is a flexible web-based workflow management tool specifically created to facilitate conduct of our clinical research initiatives within the VHA. The application was developed using the Grails web framework and allows researchers to create custom workflows using Business Process Model and Notation. RESULTS: As of January 2021, ProjectFlow has facilitated management of study recruitment, enrollment, randomization, and drug orders for over 10 000 patients for the DCP clinical trial. It has also helped us evaluate over 3800 patients for recruitment and enroll over 370 of them into RePOP for use in data sharing partnerships and predictive analytics aimed at optimizing cancer treatment in the VHA. DISCUSSION: The POC-R study design embeds research processes within day-to-day clinical care and leverages longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data for study recruitment, monitoring, and outcome reporting. Software that allows flexibility in study workflow creation and integrates with enterprise EHR systems is critical to the success of POC-R. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a flexible web-based informatics solution called ProjectFlow that supports custom research workflow configuration and has ability to integrate data from existing VHA EHR systems.