RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are at greater risk of receiving potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and developing adverse drug events. Identification and correction of PIMs is essential to maximize medication safety. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of PIMs on admission in Thai elderly patients admitted to a medical ward and to compare changes of PIMs on discharge, following comprehensive care by a ward pharmacist with or without a geriatric pharmacy specialist. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A prospective, quasi-experimental study was performed at a tertiary university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to the medical ward were recruited and allocated to one of two groups: intervention (IG) and control (CG). The CG received pharmaceutical care from the ward pharmacist. The IG received pharmaceutical care from the geriatric pharmacy specialist along with the ward pharmacist. The 2012 Beers criteria were used to identify PIMs on admission, during hospitalization, and on discharge. RESULTS: Prevalence of PIMs on admission was 43.3% (N = 187). On discharge, prevalence of PIMs in the IG decreased significantly compared to that on admission (21.3% and 43.3%, p < 0.05) and was significantly lower than in the CG (21.3% and 40.9%, p = 0.036). Moreover, the percentage of patients without PIMs on discharge in the IG was significantly higher than in the CG (78.7% and 59.1%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Use of PIMs was common among hospitalized elderly patients on admission. Pharmaceutical care provided by a geriatric pharmacy specialist in conjunction with a ward pharmacist significantly reduced the prevalence of PIMs on discharge compared with on admission.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for aneurysm subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) management recommend treatment with nimodipine to all patients to reduce delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) and poor clinical outcome. However, it did not give the most beneficial time to start therapy and route of administration. OBJECTIVES: To compare the DCI occurrence and clinical outcome among aSAH patients who received nimodipine treatment at different times. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by collecting data from medical chart reviews between August 30, 2010, and October 31, 2015, at Prasart Neurological Institute, Thailand. Patients were classified into 2 groups by time to receive nimodipine: early group and late group (<96 and >96 hours, respectively). All patients received intravenous (IV) followed by oral nimodipine to complete treatment course. Clinical outcome was graded using the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 21 days. The factors related to DCI were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were recruited: early (n = 97) and late (n = 52). No difference in baseline characteristics between groups was observed. The occurrence of DCI was not statistically significantly different between groups (early group, 18.60%, vs late group, 20.80%; P = 0.74). The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies IV to V was associated with DCI occurrence. The proportion of patients with good outcome, poor outcome, or death did not show any difference between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Receiving IV nimodipine 3 to 7 days following oral therapy after bleeding can be the alternative regimen in patients who did not start nimodipine within 96 hours.