The effect of 1-hydroxy-vitamin D treatment in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of 1-hydroxy-vitamin D on the prevention of severe disease and mortality in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS: This retrospective study included 312 patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to our hospital between April 2021 and October 2021 (primarily the Delta variant) and between July 2022 and September 2022 (primarily Omicron variant). Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured at the time of admission and 1-hydroxy-vitamin D was prescribed by the treating physicians. The patients were divided into two groups: those administered 1-hydroxy-vitamin D (Vit D group) and those who were not (control group). The composite primary endpoint was the need for additional respiratory support, including high-flow oxygen therapy or invasive mechanical ventilation, and in-hospital mortality rate. RESULTS: Of 312 patients, 122 (39%) received 1-hydroxy-vitamin D treatment. Although the median age was not significantly higher in the Vit D group than in the control group (66 vs. 58 years old, P = 0.06) and there was no significant difference in the proportion of vitamin D deficiency (defined as serum 25(OH)D level less than 20 ng/mL, 77% vs. 65%, P = 0.07), patients in the control group had a more severe baseline profile compared to the Vit D group according to the Japanese disease severity definition for COVID-19 (P = 0.01). The proportion of those requiring more respiratory support and in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the Vit D group than in the control group (6% vs. 14%, P = 0.01 log-rank test). After propensity score matching, a statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint was observed (P = 0.03 log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: 1-hydroxy-vitamin treatment may improve outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19, reducing composite outcomes including the need for additional respiratory support and in-hospital mortality.

Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid on prevention of lean body mass depletion in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Systemic inflammation plays an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), resulting in depletion of lean body mass (LBM) and muscle mass. Both frequent exacerbation of COPD and low LBM are associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to evaluate whether supplementation of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) prevents depletion of LBM and muscle mass in hospitalized patients with exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial, conducted between November 2014 and October 2017. Fifty patients were randomly assigned to receive 1 g/day of EPA-enriched oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) (EPA group) or EPA-free ONS of similar energy (control group) during hospitalization. The LBM index (LBMI) and the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) were measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer at the time of admission and at the time of discharge. Patients underwent pulmonary rehabilitation and wore a pedometer to measure step counts and physical activity. RESULTS: Forty-five patients that completed the experiment were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were similar between the EPA (n = 24) and control groups (n = 21). There were no significant differences in energy intake, step counts, physical activity, or length of hospitalization between the two groups. Although the plasma levels of EPA significantly increased only in the EPA group, we found an insignificant increase in LBMI and SMI in the EPA group compared with the control group (LBMI: +0.35 vs. +0.19 kg/m2, P = 0.60, and SMI: +0.2 vs. -0.3 kg/m2, P = 0.17, respectively). The change in the SMI was significantly correlated with the length of hospitalization in the EPA group, but not in the control group (r = 0.53, P = 0.008, and r = -0.09, P = 0.70, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EPA-enriched ONS in patients with exacerbation of COPD during short-time hospitalization had no significant advantage in preservation of LBM and muscle mass compared with EPA-free ONS. EPA supplementation for a longer duration might play an important role in the recovery of skeletal muscle mass after exacerbation of COPD.