Comparison of Tissue and Blood Concentrations of Oxaliplatin Administrated by Different Modalities of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new technology for delivering intraperitoneal chemotherapy. It is generally assumed that with PIPAC, the ratio of peritoneal to systemic drug concentration is superior to liquid hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). To date, no direct comparative data are available supporting such an assumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve 65-day-old pigs were randomly separated into three groups of four pigs each, all of which received intraperitoneal chemotherapy using the following administration methods: PIPAC with oxaliplatin 92 mg in 150 ml dextrose 5% (Group 1); PIPAC with electrostatic aerosol precipitation (ePIPAC; Group 2); or laparoscopic HIPEC (L-HIPEC) with oxaliplatin 400 mg in 4 L dextrose 5% at 42 °C (Group 3). Serial blood and peritoneal tissue concentrations of oxaliplatin were determined by spectrometry. RESULTS: In all three groups, the maximum concentration of oxaliplatin in blood was detected 50-60 min after onset of the chemotherapy experiments, with no significant differences among the three groups (p = 0.7994). Blood oxaliplatin concentrations (0-30 min) were significantly higher in the L-HIPEC group compared with the ePIPAC group (p < 0.05). No difference was found for the overall systemic oxaliplatin absorption (area under the curve). Overall concentrations in the peritoneum were not different among the three groups (p = 0.4725), but were significantly higher in the visceral peritoneum in the PIPAC group (p = 0.0242). CONCLUSIONS: Blood and tissue concentrations were comparable between all groups; however, depending on the intraperitoneal area examined and the time points of drug delivery, the concentrations differed significantly between the three groups.

Comparison of the risk of postoperative infection between transurethral vaporesection and transurethral resection of the prostate.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We observed in our department at 3 months two episodes of bacteremia postoperatively to photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP). We decided to compare the frequency of postoperative urinary tract infections (POUTIs) in patients with preoperative bacterial colonization of urine between PVP and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to December 2011, we studied patients who underwent PVP or TURP for benign prostatic obstruction in our department. Preoperative urine culture (UC) was carried out for all patients and we included those with preoperative bacterial colonization of the urinary tract. Patients were treated preoperatively with an appropriate antibiotic treatment and/or inductive prophylactic antibiotics. Patients were diagnosed with POUTI if they had clinical signs of infections (e.g., fever) and a positive UC during the month after surgery. RESULTS: Patients were treated by PVP in 49 cases and TURP in 62 cases. A preoperative indwelling urinary catheter was inserted in 80% of the patients. During the postoperative period, eight episodes of fever were identified in the PVP group (16%), five (8%) in the TURP group (P = 0.18). We then studied the subgroup of patients with multiple bacteria strains present in the preoperative UC and identified significant differences. The risk of POUTI was significantly higher in patients treated by PVP than in those treated by TURP (P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: We found significant differences between subgroups of patients with positive preoperative cultures (containing various bacterial strains). The risk of POUTI was significantly higher in patients treated by PVP.