Nonpharmacological Therapies for Musculoskeletal Injury in Military Personnel: A Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Musculoskeletal (MSK) injury is an inherent risk for military personnel that can potentially impact job performance, productivity, and military readiness. Evidence is needed to show the efficacy of nonpharmacological, self-managed therapies to reduce MSK symptoms at common injury sites that are feasible for use during expeditionary operations and home stations. This systematic review and meta-analysis identified, summarized, and synthesized available evidence from randomized and non-randomized trials on the effectiveness of self-managed, home-use therapies to improve pain, muscle strength, and physical performance in military personnel with MSK injuries, when compared to controls. METHODS: The electronic databases of MEDLINE ALL Ovid, Embase.com, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Clinicaltrial.gov, and CINAHL Complete via EBSCO were systematically searched for relevant reports published in English. Utilizing the Covidence platform and consistent with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, multiple reviewers, using pre-determined data fields, screened for eligibility, assessed risk of bias (RoB), and performed data extraction. Evaluation of treatment effectiveness was determined using multilevel mixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: The database and register search yielded 1,643 reports that were screened for eligibility. After screening of titles/abstracts and full texts, 21 reports were identified for evidence synthesis. Of these, two reports were excluded and two described the same study, resulting in a final list of 18 studies (19 reports). For quality assessment, the overall RoB for the 18 studies was categorized as 33.3% low risk, 55.6% with some concerns, and 11.1% high risk. Across the five domains of bias, 70% of the reports were classified as low risk. This systematic review found that the differences in interventions, outcome measures, and design between the studies were associated with a substantial degree of heterogeneity (I2 = 60.74%), with a small overall improvement in outcomes of the interventions relative to their specific control (standard mean difference 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.45). There were varying degrees of heterogeneity for individual body regions. This was due, in part, to a small number of studies per bodily location and differences in the study designs. For the neck/shoulder, heterogeneity was moderate, with the clearest positive effect being for physical performance outcomes via other medical devices. For the back, there was substantial heterogeneity between studies, with modest evidence that pain was favorably improved by other medical devices and exercise interventions. For the leg, one study showed a clear large effect for other medical devices (shockwave treatment) on pain with substantial heterogeneity. The best evidence for positive effects was for the knee, with mainly negligible heterogeneity and some benefits from bracing, electrotherapy, and exercise. CONCLUSION: Evidence showed small beneficial effects in pain, strength, and physical performance by individual body regions for some interventions, compared to controls. The best evidence for a positive effect was for the knee. The findings suggest that some benefit may be obtained by including several treatments during deployment in austere environments and prolonged casualty care scenarios of military personnel with MSK injuries. Further research is warranted to better assess the potential benefits of using these treatments during deployments in austere environments as part of an individualized, multimodal approach for MSK injuries.

Influence of Self-managed Rehabilitation on Work Efficiency in Active Duty Military With a Knee Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Knee injuries associated with intense physical training are one of the most frequent injuries associated with medical encounters for military members. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four approaches to physiotherapy rehabilitation and their effects on work efficiency in active duty military with a knee injury. The four groups included neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), walking with a weighted vest (WALK), combined NMES/Walk, and standard physiotherapy rehabilitation. All groups received standard physiotherapy rehabilitation.We have previously reported that quadriceps muscle strength improved over 18 weeks in the study for the three interventions relative to standard rehabilitation alone. This report presents results from an examination of work efficiency as evaluated during a step test while measuring oxygen utilization. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, with repeated outcome measures of work efficiency assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 weeks. The sample consisted of 67 active duty service members between the ages of 18 and 50 years with a knee injury. Participants were randomized to one of the four approaches to physiotherapy rehabilitation: (1) NMES was applied to the quadriceps muscle four times per week, for 30 minutes (15 minutes to each leg), consisting of 15 quadriceps muscle contractions per leg; (2) graduated strength walking using a weighted vest (WALK) was for 30 minutes, 3 to 4 days a week; (3) combined NMES with strength walking received both the NMES therapy and the weighted vest walking; and (4) standard physiotherapy consisted of progressive exercise with the number and type of sessions not controlled by the study. All four groups received the standard physiotherapy for a knee injury. The primary outcome was work efficiency, as measured by oxygen utilization during a 2-minute self-paced step test over 18 weeks. The primary analysis used repeated measures, linear mixed-effects models with a random effect for subject. RESULTS: Both the number of steps performed and gross work efficiency improved during the study for all three intervention groups. For gross work efficiency, standard rehabilitation improved 12%, WALK showed a 19% improvement, NMES increased by 24%, and the NMES/Walk group improved by 40%. CONCLUSIONS: All groups showed improved submaximal exercise efficiency based on oxygen utilization, with the intervention groups showing a greater improvement in work efficiency as compared to standard rehabilitation. Knee injuries can be problematic for active duty members because of reduced mobility leading to deconditioning and associated declines in work efficiency. Rehabilitative programs, including those described in this study, may minimize loss of work efficiency and fitness and promote a quicker recovery.

Electrical Stimulation Therapies for Active Duty Military with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder among military service members that causes knee pain, quadriceps strength loss, and impaired motor performance in otherwise healthy individuals. PFPS poses a threat to the health, fitness, and subsequent readiness of the total force. The goal of rehabilitation for military service members with PFPS is to regain physical capacity of strength and function and to reduce pain, in order to restore readiness in this population. The randomized controlled trial reported here compared an active home exercise program (HEP) alone with three different electrical stimulation treatment regimens implemented concurrently with HEP postulated improvements in lower extremity strength and physical functional performance while also reducing pain in active duty military diagnosed with PFPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After baseline testing, 130 active duty military members with PFPS were randomized to 1 of 4 treatment groups: (1) neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) with HEP; (2) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) with HEP; (3) combined NMES/TENS with HEP; (4) active HEP only. The primary outcome measure was degree of change in knee flexion and extension strength over 9 weeks. Secondary outcomes were physical functional performance and knee pain. The primary analyses used repeated measures, linear mixed-effects models with a random effect for subject, time as a continuous variable, group as a categorical variable, and a group and time interaction to test for differences in change over time among the groups. RESULTS: All three electrical stimulation treatment groups improved in knee extension strength in the PFPS limb to a greater extent than the HEP alone group over the 9-week treatment period. The NMES and NMES/TENS groups improved to a greater extent than the HEP alone group in knee flexion strength in the PFPS limb. The reported pain improved over time for all treatment groups with no significant group differences. All three stimulation groups performed better on the 6-min walk test than the HEP alone group. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study showed that all three electrical stimulation with HEP treatment groups showed greater improvement in strength compared to the HEP alone group. These findings could offer alternative forms of rehabilitation for AD military with PFPS as these treatment regimens can be easily implemented at home station or during deployment.

Psychological and Physical Health in Military Amputees During Rehabilitation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Service members who have experienced combat trauma with resulting amputation are at risk for compromised quality of life postamputation. Monitoring mental and physical health in amputees returning from the war is of paramount importance. This study examined changes in physical and mental health-related quality of life in service members following traumatic unilateral, transtibial amputation (TTA) during a 12-week period of rehabilitation before and after receiving a prosthesis. METHOD: This study is a secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of military service members starting Military Amputee Rehabilitation Program (MARP) following a traumatic TTA. The study examined change in SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores as two aspects of health-related quality of life. Forty-four injured service members, aged 19 to 46, were recruited into the RCT. Participants were randomized into 12 weeks of MARP plus home neuromuscular electrical stimulation therapy (n = 23) or MARP alone (N = 21) and compared at baseline, 6, and 12 weeks on: SF-36 PCS and MCS scores. Linear mixed models examined time and group differences and their interaction for the MCS and PCS scores. A multivariate mixed model tested whether MCS and PCS scores differed. RESULTS: For the combined rehabilitation cohort, MCS did not differ over 12 weeks (p = 0.27) with scores at week 0 of M = 56.7 (SD = 11.9) and at week 12 of M = 52.7 (SD = 11.4), similar to healthy controls (age = 25-34, M = 51.0, SD = 7.6). Scores did not differ between treatment groups (p = 0.28) with no group by time interaction (p = 0.34). The MCS significantly declined over time (p = 0.05) after adjustment for covariates. PCS improved over 12 weeks (p < 0.0001) in the total rehabilitation group with scores at week 0 of M = 34.0 (SD = 8.1) to M = 41.8 (SD = 8.4) at week 12, significantly lower than healthy controls (age = 25-34, M = 54.1, SD = 6.6). Scores did not differ between treatment groups (p = 0.89), and there was no group by time interaction (p = 0.34). An interaction between the PCS and MCS was observed such that the PCS improved over time, whereas the MCS did not significantly change (p = 0.0005). DISCUSSION: War-injured transtibial amputees are at risk for compromised quality of life during rehabilitation. Self-perceived physical health improved as might be expected from rehabilitation. Self-perceived mental health did not. During rehabilitation, physical healing, psychological adjustment, and lifestyle adaptation are occurring simultaneously. However, more attention may need to be directed toward mental health during rehabilitation.

Effects of Adding Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation to Traditional Military Amputee Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic transtibial amputations lead to an early decline in the use and weight bearing of the residual limb. These changes result in progressive quadriceps muscle atrophy with strength loss that affects standing and walking. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) may be useful as an adjunct to amputee prosthetic rehabilitation to maintain quadriceps muscle strength and mass. The objective of this pilot study was to compare the effects of a home-based NMES rehabilitation program plus the traditional military amputee rehabilitation program (TMARP) to the effects of TMARP alone on quadriceps muscle strength, functional mobility, and pain in military service members after a combat-related lower extremity amputation. METHODS: In total, 44 participants, aged 19 to 46 years, with a unilateral transtibial amputation were randomly assigned to the TMARP plus NMES (n = 23) or to TMARP alone (n = 21). Both groups received 12 weeks of the traditional amputee rehabilitation, including pre- and postprosthetic training. Those in the NMES group also received 12 weeks of NMES, 15 to 20 minutes/day, 5 days a week. Participants were tested at 3-week intervals during the study (baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks) for muscle strength and pain. For functional measures, they were tested after receiving their prosthesis and at study completion (weeks 6 and 12). RESULTS: In both groups, residual limb quadriceps muscle strength and pain severity improved from baseline to 12 weeks. The NMES plus TMARP group showed greater strength than the TMARP alone group at 3 weeks, before receiving the prosthesis. However, 6 weeks after receiving their prosthesis, there was no group difference in the residual limb strength. Functional mobility improved in both groups between weeks 6 and 12 with no difference between the two treatment groups. DISCUSSION: A home-based NMES intervention with TMARP worked at improving residual limb strength, pain, and mobility. NMES seemed most effective in minimizing strength loss in the amputated leg before receiving the prosthesis. Further research on amputation rehabilitation is warranted as NMES may accelerate recovery post amputation.

The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on arthritis knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee.

The objective of this study was to examine the short- and long-term effects of a home-based, 12-week neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the quadriceps femoris to decrease arthritis knee pain in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee. The study sample (N = 38) was randomly assigned to the NMES treatment plus education group or the arthritis education-only group. Pain was measured in both groups with the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) at baseline, during the intervention at weeks 4, 8, 12, and at follow-up and with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2-Pain Subscale (AIMS2-PS) at baseline and week 12. The NMES Pain Diary (PD) was completed 15 minutes before and after each stimulation session. There was a significant 22% decline in pain 15 minutes after as compared with immediately before each NMES treatment (p <.001), as measured by the PD. No significant group differences were found between the 2 groups over the course of the intervention and follow-up. These findings indicate that a home-based NMES intervention reduced arthritis knee pain 15 minutes after a NMES treatment.

A home-based protocol of electrical muscle stimulation for quadriceps muscle strength in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applied to the quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle increases strength, physical activity, and physical performance in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Thirty-four adults (> 60 yrs) with radiographically confirmed symptomatic knee OA were randomized to NMES plus education or education only (EDU). The primary outcome was isometric QF peak torque (PTIso), with secondary outcomes of daily step counts, total activity vector magnitude, 100-foot walk-turn-walk, timed stair climb, chair rise, and pain. The NMES group used a portable electrical muscle stimulator 3 days a week for unilateral QF training with incremental increases in the intensity of isometric contraction to 30-40% of maximum over 12 weeks. Both groups received the 12-week Arthritis Self-Management course and were followed an additional 12 weeks. RESULTS: The stimulated knee-extensor showed a 9.1% increase in 120 degrees PTIso compared to a 7% loss in the EDU group (time x group interaction for 120 degrees PTIso; p = 0.04). The chair rise time decreased by 11% in the NMES group, whereas the EDU group saw a 7% reduction (p = 0.01, time; p = 0.9, group). Similarly, both groups improved their walk time by approximately 7% (p = 0.02, time; p = 0.61 group). Severity of pain reported following intervention did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: In older adults with knee OA, a home-based NMES protocol appears to be a promising therapy for increasing QF strength in adults with knee OA without exacerbating painful symptoms.