An antimicrobial blue light device to manage infection at the skin-implant interface of percutaneous osseointegrated implants.

Antimicrobial blue light (aBL) is an attractive option for managing biofilm burden at the skin-implant interface of percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) implants. However, marketed aBL devices have both structural and optical limitations that prevent them from being used in an OI implant environment. They must be handheld, preventing even irradiation of the entire skin-implant interface, and the devices do not offer sufficient optical power outputs required to kill biofilms. We present the developmental process of a unique aBL device that overcomes these limitations. Four prototypes are detailed, each being a progressive improvement from the previous iteration as we move from proof-of-concept to in vivo application. Design features focused on a cooling system, LED orientation, modularity, and "sheep-proofing". The final prototype was tested in an in vivo OI implant sheep model, demonstrating that it was structurally and optically adequate to address biofilm burdens at the skin-implant of percutaneous OI implants. The device made it possible to test aBL in the unique OI implant environment and compare its efficacy to clinical antibiotics-data which had not before been achievable. It has provided insight into whether or not continued pursual of light therapy research for OI implants, and other percutaneous devices, is worthwhile. However, the device has drawbacks concerning the cooling system, complexity, and size if it is to be translated to human clinical trials. Overall, we successfully developed a device to test aBL therapy for patients with OI implants and helped progress understanding in the field of infection management strategies.

Local vasoregulative interventions impact drug concentrations in the skin after topical laser-assisted delivery.

INTRODUCTION: The ability of ablative fractional lasers (AFL) to enhance topical drug uptake is well established. After AFL delivery, however, drug clearance by local vasculature is poorly understood. Modifications in vascular clearance may enhance AFL-assisted drug concentrations and prolong drug dwell time in the skin. Aiming to assess the role and modifiability of vascular clearance after AFL-assisted delivery, this study examined the impact of vasoregulative interventions on AFL-assisted 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concentrations in in vivo skin. METHODS: 5-FU uptake was assessed in intact and AFL-exposed skin in a live pig model. After fractional CO2 laser exposure (15 mJ/microbeam, 5% density), vasoregulative intervention using topical brimonidine cream, epinephrine solution, or pulsed dye laser (PDL) was performed in designated treatment areas, followed by a single 5% 5-FU cream application. At 0, 1, 4, 48, and 72 h, 5-FU concentrations were measured in 500 and 1500 µm skin layers by mass spectrometry (n = 6). A supplemental assessment of blood flow following AFL ± vasoregulation was performed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in a human volunteer. RESULTS: Compared to intact skin, AFL facilitated a prompt peak in 5-FU delivery that remained elevated up to 4 hours (1500 µm: 1.5 vs. 31.8 ng/ml [1 hour, p = 0.002]; 5.3 vs. 14.5 ng/ml [4 hours, p = 0.039]). However, AFL's impact was transient, with 5-FU concentrations comparable to intact skin at later time points. Overall, vasoregulative intervention with brimonidine or PDL led to significantly higher peak 5-FU concentrations, prolonging the drug's dwell time in the skin versus AFL delivery alone. As such, brimonidine and PDL led to twofold higher 5-FU concentrations than AFL alone in both skin layers by 1 hour (e.g., 500 µm: 107 ng/ml [brimonidine]; 96.9 ng/ml [PDL], 46.6 ng/ml [AFL alone], p ≤ 0.024), and remained significantly elevated at 4 hours (p ≤ 0.024). A similar pattern was observed for epinephrine, although trends remained nonsignificant (p ≥ 0.09). Prolonged 5-FU delivery was provided by PDL, resulting in sustained drug deposition compared to AFL alone at both 48 and 72 hours in the superficial skin layer (p ≤ 0.024). Supporting drug delivery findings, OCT revealed that increases in local blood flow after AFL were mitigated in test areas also exposed to PDL, brimonidine, or epinephrine, with PDL providing the greatest, sustained reduction in flow over 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Vasoregulative intervention in conjunction with AFL-assisted delivery enhances and prolongs 5-FU deposition in in vivo skin.

Photobiomodulation Response From 660 nm is Different and More Durable Than That From 980 nm.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy uses light at various wavelengths to stimulate wound healing, grow hair, relieve pain, and more-but there is no consensus about optimal wavelengths or dosimetry. PBM therapy works through putative, wavelength-dependent mechanisms including direct stimulation of mitochondrial respiration, and/or activation of transmembrane signaling channels by changes in water activity. A common wavelength used in the visible red spectrum is ~660 nm, whereas recently ~980 nm is being explored and both have been proposed to work via different mechanisms. We aimed to gain more insight into identifying treatment parameters and the putative mechanisms involved. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fluence-response curves were measured in cultured keratinocytes and fibroblasts exposed to 660 or 980 nm from LED sources. Metabolic activity was assessed using the MTT assay for reductases. ATP production, a major event triggered by PBM therapy, was assessed using a luminescence assay. To measure the role of mitochondria, we used an ELISA to measure COX-1 and SDH-A protein levels. The respective contributions of cytochrome c oxidase and ATP synthase to the PBM effects were gauged using specific inhibitors. RESULTS: Keratinocytes and fibroblasts responded differently to exposures at 660 nm (red) and 980 nm (NIR). Although 980 nm required much lower fluence for cell stimulation, the resulting increase in ATP levels was short-term, whereas 660 nm stimulation elevated ATP levels for at least 24 hours. COX-1 protein levels were increased following 660 nm treatment but were unaffected by 980 nm. In fibroblasts, SDH-A levels were affected by both wavelengths, whereas in keratinocytes only 660 nm light impacted SDH-A levels. Inhibition of ATP synthase nearly completely abolished the effects of both wavelengths on ATP synthesis. Interestingly, inhibiting cytochrome c oxidase did not prevent the rise in ATP levels in response to PBM treatment. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of differing kinetics in response to PBM therapy at red versus NIR wavelength. We also found cell-type-specific differences in PBM therapy response to the two wavelengths studied. These findings confirm that different response pathways are involved after 660 and 980 nm exposures and suggest that 660 nm causes a more durable response. © 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.