Baseline CT-based Radiomic Features Aid Prediction of Nodal Positivity after Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer.

Purpose To study the association between CT-derived textural features of pancreatic cancer and patient outcome. Materials and Methods This retrospective study evaluated 54 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 40-88 years]; 32 men) with pancreatic cancer who underwent chemoradiation followed by surgical resection and lymph node dissection from May 2012 to June 2016. Three-dimensional segmentation of the pancreatic tumor was performed on baseline dual-energy CT images: 70-keV pancreatic parenchymal phase (PPP) images and iodine material density images. Then, 15 and 19 radiomic features were extracted from each phase, respectively. Logistic regression with elastic net regularization was used to select textural features associated with outcome, and receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated feature performance. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The feature of integral total (∫ T), representing the mean intensity in Hounsfield units times the contour volume in milliliters of PPP imaging (hereafter, "∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP)"), is inversely associated with posttherapy pathologic lymph node (ypN) category. A threshold ∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) less than 507.85 predicted ypN1-2 classification with 96% sensitivity, 34% specificity, and area under the curve of 0.61. Patients with an ∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) of less than 507.85 had decreased overall survival (median, 2.8 years) compared with patients with an ∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) of 507.85 or greater (one event at 3.4 years) (P = .006). Patients with an ∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) of less than 507.85 had decreased progression-free survival (median, 1.5 years) compared with patients with an ∫ T (HU·mL) (PPP) of 507.85 or greater (median, 2.7 years) (P = .001). Conclusion A CT-based radiomic signature may help predict ypN category in patients with pancreatic cancer. Keywords: CT-Dual Energy, Abdomen/GI, Pancreas, Tumor Response, Outcomes Analysis © RSNA, 2022 Supplemental material is available for this article.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part I, AJCC staging system, NCCN guidelines, and borderline resectable disease.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Accurate staging of PDAC is an important initial step in the development of a stage-specific treatment plan. Different staging systems/consensus statements convened by different societies and academic practices are currently used. The most recent version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastases (TNM) staging system for PDAC has shifted its focus from guiding management to assessing prognosis. In order to preoperatively define the resectability of PDAC and to guide management, additional classification systems have been developed. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, one of the most commonly used systems, provide recommendations on the management and the determination of resectability for PDAC. The NCCN divides PDAC into three categories of resectability based on tumor-vessel relationship: 'resectable,' 'borderline resectable,' and 'unresectable'. Among these, the borderline disease category is of special interest given its evolution over time and the resulting variations in the definition and the associated recommendations for management between different societies. It is important to be familiar with the evolving criteria, and treatment and follow-up recommendations for PDAC. In this article, the most current AJCC staging (8th edition), NCCN guidelines (version 2.2019-April 9, 2019), and challenges and controversies in borderline resectable PDAC are reviewed.

Dual-Energy CT: Lower Limits of Iodine Detection and Quantification.

Background Assessments of the quantitative limitations among the six commercially available dual-energy (DE) CT acquisition schemes used by major CT manufacturers could aid researchers looking to use iodine quantification as an imaging biomarker. Purpose To determine the limits of detection and quantification of DE CT in phantoms by comparing rapid peak kilovoltage switching, dual-source, split-filter, and dual-layer detector systems in six different scanners. Materials and Methods Seven 50-mL iohexol solutions were used, with concentrations of 0.03-2.0 mg iodine per milliliter. The solutions and water sample were scanned five times each in two phantoms (small, 20-cm diameter; large, 30 × 40-cm diameter) with six DE CT systems and a total of 10 peak kilovoltage settings or combinations. Iodine maps were created, and the mean iodine signal in each sample was recorded. The limit of blank (LOB) was defined as the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the water sample. The limit of detection (LOD) was defined as the concentration with a 95% chance of having a signal above the LOB. The limit of quantification (LOQ) was defined as the lowest concentration where the coefficient of variation was less than 20%. Results The LOD range was 0.021-0.26 mg/mL in the small phantom and 0.026-0.55 mg/mL in the large phantom. The LOQ range was 0.07-0.50 mg/mL in the small phantom and 0.20-1.0 mg/mL in the large phantom. The dual-source and rapid peak kilovoltage switching systems had the lowest LODs, and the dual-layer detector systems had the highest LODs. Conclusion The iodine limit of detection using dual-energy CT systems varied with scanner and phantom size, but all systems depicted iodine in the small and large phantoms at or below 0.3 and 0.5 mg/mL, respectively, and enabled quantification at concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 mg/mL, respectively. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Hindman in this issue.

Intermanufacturer Comparison of Dual-Energy CT Iodine Quantification and Monochromatic Attenuation: A Phantom Study.

Purpose To determine the accuracy of dual-energy computed tomographic (CT) quantitation in a phantom system comparing fast kilovolt peak-switching, dual-source, split-filter, sequential-scanning, and dual-layer detector systems. Materials and Methods A large elliptical phantom containing iodine (2, 5, and 15 mg/mL), simulated contrast material-enhanced blood, and soft-tissue inserts with known elemental compositions was scanned three to five times with seven dual-energy CT systems and a total of 10 kilovolt peak settings. Monochromatic images (50, 70, and 140 keV) and iodine concentration images were created. Mean iodine concentration and monochromatic attenuation for each insert and reconstruction energy level were recorded. Measurement bias was assessed by using the sum of the mean signed errors measured across relevant inserts for each monochromatic energy level and iodine concentration. Iodine and monochromatic errors were assessed by using the root sum of the squared error of all measurements. Results At least one acquisition paradigm per scanner had iodine biases (range, -2.6 to 1.5 mg/mL) with significant differences from zero. There were no significant differences in iodine error (range, 0.44-1.70 mg/mL) among the top five acquisition paradigms (one fast kilovolt peak switching, three dual source, and one sequential scanning). Monochromatic bias was smallest for 70 keV (-12.7 to 15.8 HU) and largest for 50 keV (-80.6 to 35.2 HU). There were no significant differences in monochromatic error (range, 11.4-52.0 HU) among the top three acquisition paradigms (one dual source and two fast kilovolt peak switching). The lowest accuracy for both measures was with a split-filter system. Conclusion Iodine and monochromatic accuracy varies among systems, but dual-source and fast kilovolt-switching generally provided the most accurate results in a large phantom. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high mortality rate. Proper determination of the extent of disease on imaging studies at the time of staging is one of the most important steps in optimal patient management. Given the variability in expertise and definition of disease extent among different practitioners as well as frequent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed. A consensus statement describing a standardized reporting template authored by a multi-institutional group of experts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that included radiologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons was developed under the joint sponsorship of the Society of Abdominal Radiologists and the American Pancreatic Association. Adoption of this standardized imaging reporting template should improve the decision-making process for the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by providing a complete, pertinent, and accurate reporting of disease staging to optimize treatment recommendations that can be offered to the patient. Standardization can also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using appropriate and consistent staging by means of resectability status, thus allowing for comparison of results among different institutions.

Phase I trial evaluating the safety of bevacizumab with concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the safety of bevacizumab with capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma received bevacizumab 2 weeks before radiotherapy (50.4 Gy treating the primary tumor and gross adenopathy), every 2 weeks during radiotherapy (12 patients each at 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg), and after radiotherapy until disease progression. Capecitabine was administered on days 14 through 52 (650 mg/m2 orally twice daily for the first six patients; 825 mg/m2 for the remaining patients). RESULTS: Significant acute gastrointestinal (43% grade 2; 4% grade 3), hand and foot syndrome (21% grade 2), and transient hematologic (8% grade 3 or greater) events were uncommon with protocol mandated dose reductions of capecitabine grade 2 toxicity (43% of patients). Among the first 30 patients treated, three patients had tumor-associated bleeding duodenal ulcers, and one had a contained duodenal perforation. No additional bleeding events occurred among the final 18 patients after patients with duodenal involvement by tumor were excluded. Nine (20%) of 46 assessable patients had confirmed partial responses until distant progression for a median of 6.2 months. Four patients have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy without perioperative complication. The median survival was 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 13.6), from the start of protocol therapy. CONCLUSION: Concurrent bevacizumab did not significantly increase the acute toxicity of a relatively well-tolerated chemoradiotherapy regimen. However, ulceration and bleeding in the radiation field possibly related to bevacizumab occurred when tumor involved the duodenal mucosa. The encouraging efficacy end points suggest that the further study of bevacizumab with chemoradiotherapy is warranted.

Radiation dose considerations in the palliative treatment of locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with high-dose radiotherapy has not been curative, and can be difficult to tolerate. We decided to compare retrospectively the outcomes of patients treated concurrently with 5-fluorouracil and either 30 Gy or more than 30 Gy of radiation. From December 1993 through May 2001, 107 patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas had been treated with palliative chemoradiation. Eighty-six patients had received a prescribed dose of 30 Gy and 50.4 Gy had been prescribed in 18 patients. Two of these patients were unable to complete the full dose of radiotherapy due to toxicity, and 3 received intraoperative radiotherapy boost (20 Gy). Three additional patients received a prescribed dose of 33 Gy, 36 Gy, and 52.2 Gy, respectively. These patients were grouped together (n = 21, median 50.4 Gy). All patients had received concurrent protracted venous infusions of 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m Monday through Friday). The median survival time was not affected significantly by a higher radiotherapy dose (8 months for the 30 Gy group versus 9 months for the group receiving higher doses; P = 0.64). The 6-month actuarial progression rates were 45% versus 50% (P = 0.90) for local disease progression, and 54% versus 50% (P = 0.94) for distant metastasis for the 30 Gy and the higher dose groups, respectively. Ten of the 86 patients (12%) who had received 30 Gy were hospitalized for treatment-related gastrointestinal toxicity (grade 3) versus 6 of the 21 (29%) patients given higher doses (P = 0.05). Compared with higher doses given over 5 to 6 weeks, chemoradiation (30 Gy in 10 fractions in 2 weeks with concurrent infusional 5-FU) results in a similar median survival, and local disease progression rates in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer apparently do not substantially improve local disease control or median survival time. Because higher doses of radiotherapy can lead to increased acute treatment-related morbidity, we recommend using 30 Gy in 10 fractions unless the patient is part of a prospective study evaluating novel biologic or cytotoxic radiosensitizers.