Clinical dose findings of sitafloxacin treatment: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of two clinical trial results for community-acquired respiratory tract infections.

The adequacy of sitafloxacin clinical dose regimens was assessed by comparing the efficacy of the administration of 100 mg sitafloxacin once daily (100 mg qd group) and 50 mg sitafloxacin twice daily (50 mg bid group). Patients with respiratory tract infections caused by pneumococci were orally treated with sitafloxacin (100 mg qd or 50 mg bid) for 7 days. The clinical efficacy, pneumococci eradication rate, safety, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic indices of the two groups were then assessed. The clinical efficacy was 93.5 % in both groups. The pneumococci eradication rate was 98.2 % in the 100 mg qd group and 92.7 % in the 50 mg bid group. The mean of the free AUC0-24h divided by the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (fAUC0-24h/MIC) did not differ significantly between the 100 mg qd (103.24) and the 50 mg bid groups (105.25). The mean of the free C peak divided by the MIC (fC peak/MIC) was higher in the 100 mg qd group (10.19) than in the 50 mg bid group (6.53). The pathogen eradication rate was 98.9 % (89/90) when the fAUC0-24h/MIC was greater than 30, and the eradication rate was 98.9 % (89/90) when the fC peak/MIC was greater than 2. The incidences of adverse drug reactions were 33.7 % in the 100 mg qd group and 40.4 % in the 50 mg bid group. No obvious differences in the efficacy and safety were observed between the dosage groups. For cases in which a sufficiently high C peak is necessary to ensure the susceptibility of the pathogens to the drug, 100 mg sitafloxacin once daily should be administered.

Clinical and bacteriological efficacies of sitafloxacin against community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae: nested cohort within a multicenter clinical trial.

We evaluated the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of oral sitafloxacin (STFX) in clinically diagnosed community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Additionally, we cultured these patient samples to test the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of levofloxacin (LVFX), moxifloxacin (MFLX), STFX, and penicillin G (PCG), as well as identified mutations in the quinolone resistance determinant regions (QRDRs) in LVFX-resistant strains. This study is a nested cohort from a prospective, multicenter clinical trial consisting of 139 patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), from which 72 were included in this study. After diagnosis of CAP caused by S. pneumoniae, STFX (50 mg twice daily, or 100 mg once daily) was orally administered for 7 days. Sixty-five patient sputum samples were then cultured for MIC analysis. In a LVFX-resistant strain that was identified, mutations in the QRDRs of the gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE genes were examined. Of 72 patients eligible for this study, S. pneumoniae was successfully cultured from the sputum of 65 patients, and only 7 patients were diagnosed by urinary antigen only. Clinical improvement of CAP was obtained in 65 of the 69 clinically evaluable patients (65/69, 94.2 %). Eradication of S. pneumoniae was observed in 62 patients of the 65 bacteriologically evaluable patients (62/65, 95.4 %). Additionally, STFX showed the lowest MIC distribution compared with LVFX, MFLX, and PCG, and no major adverse reactions were observed. STFX treatment in patients with CAP caused by S. pneumoniae was found to be highly effective both clinically (94.2 %) and bacteriologically (95.4 %).

Optimal treatment schedule of meropenem for adult patients with febrile neutropenia based on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.

The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of meropenem, to simulate the percent time above minimum inhibitory concentration (%T > MIC) at various MICs, and to estimate effective dosage regimens by calculating the target attainment rates against various strains of bacteria. A total of 209 plasma samples (1-3 concentrations per patient) were obtained from 98 adult Japanese patients with febrile neutropenia in an open-labeled Phase 3 study. The final population PK model was fit to a two-compartment model with zero-order input. Creatinine clearance had a positive significant correlation with CL. Gender had a significant effect on Vc; however, this effect was small, and the PK profile in male patients was similar to that in female patients. The population PK parameters developed in this study are useful in simulating PK profiles of meropenem at various dosage regimens precisely for calculation of %T > MIC. The PK-PD analysis indicated that 0.5 g every 6 h (q6h) was more effective than 1 g q12h, although provided 2 g per day in total. A meropenem dosage regimen of 1 g q8h and/or longer infusion duration was better against a pathogen of comparatively low sensitivity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (for MIC ≥2 µg/ml). Although causative bacteria were identified in a small number of patients, the target attainment rates at 75%T > MIC (89%) were comparable to microbiological response (89%). The present PK-PD analyses under various conditions are useful in the treatment of febrile neutropenia.

A new active vitamin D3 analog, eldecalcitol, prevents the risk of osteoporotic fractures--a randomized, active comparator, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Eldecalcitol is an analog of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) that improves bone mineral density; however, the effect of eldecalcitol on the risk of fractures is unclear. The objective of this study is to examine whether eldecalcitol is superior to alfacalcidol in preventing osteoporotic fractures. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00144456. METHODS AND RESULTS: This 3 year randomized, double-blind, active comparator, superiority trial tested the efficacy of daily oral 0.75 µg eldecalcitol versus 1.0 µg alfacalcidol for prevention of osteoporotic fractures. 1054 osteoporotic patients 46 to 92 years old were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive eldecalcitol (n=528) or alfacalcidol (n=526). Patients were stratified by study site and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. Patients with low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (<50 nmol/L) were supplemented with 400 IU/day vitamin D(3). Primary end point was incident vertebral fractures. Secondary end points included any non-vertebral fractures and change in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. Compared with the alfacalcidol group, the incidence of vertebral fractures was lower in eldecalcitol group after 36 months of treatment (13.4 vs. 17.5%; hazard ratio, 0.74; predefined 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-0.97). Eldecalcitol reduced turnover markers and increased bone mineral density more strongly than alfacalcidol. Eldecalcitol reduced the incidence of three major non-vertebral fractures, which was due to a marked reduction in wrist fractures by a post-hoc analysis (1.1 vs. 3.6%; hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77). Among the adverse events, the incidence of increase in serum and urinary calcium was higher in the eldecalcitol group, without any difference in glomerular filtration rate between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Eldecalcitol is more efficacious than alfacalcidol in preventing vertebral and wrist fractures in osteoporotic patients with vitamin D sufficiency, with a safety profile similar to alfacalcidol.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of arbekacin for treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Arbekacin is widely used in Japan for the treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In this study, we have determined the optimal concentration targets of arbekacin for both efficacy and safety. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis was performed to relate exposure to the drug and clinical cure/improvement or nephrotoxicity. Since we have reported the population pharmacokinetic parameters for arbekacin in the preceding paper (Y. Tanigawara, R. Sato, K. Morita, M. Kaku, N. Aikawa, and K. Shimizu, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50:3754-3762, 2006), individual exposure parameters, such as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), peak concentration (C(max)), AUC/MIC, C(max)/MIC, and trough concentration (C(min)) were estimated by the Bayesian method. Logistic regression was used to describe the relationship between exposure to the drug and the probability of clinical cure/improvement or nephrotoxicity. For the clinical efficacy analysis, 174 patients confirmed to have an MRSA infection were evaluated. The C(max), C(min), and AUC of arbekacin were associated with the probability of clinical cure/improvement during monotherapy. It was shown that the probability of cure/improvement rose when the C(max) of arbekacin was increased, with an odds ratio of 6.7 for a change in C(max) from 7.9 to 12.5 microg/ml (P = 0.037). For the nephrotoxic risk analysis, 333 patients were included, regardless of whether a pathogen was identified. Logistic regression analysis revealed C(min) and AUC as risk factors of nephrotoxicity (P < 0.005). The estimated probabilities of arbekacin-induced nephrotoxicity were 2.5, 5.2, and 13.1% when the C(min) values were 1, 2, and 5 microg/ml, respectively. The present findings are useful for optimizing the individual dose of arbekacin for the treatment of MRSA-infected patients.

Phase I/II study of oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (ROX) as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) with oxaliplatin is one of the current standard regimens for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Weekly bolus 5-FU with high-dose LV (Roswell Park Memorial Institute Regimen: RPMI) is the most commonly used regimen in Japan. The objectives of this study were to determine the recommended dose (RD) of RPMI combined with oxaliplatin and to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy at the RD. METHODS: The subjects were 18 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) was given intravenously over 2 h on days 1 and 15 with l-LV (250 mg/m2) given intravenously over 2 h and 5-FU as an intravenous bolus on days 1, 8, and 15. This treatment was repeated every 4 weeks. The dose of 5-FU was escalated from 400 mg/m2 (level 1) to 500 mg/m2 (level 2). RESULTS: A total of 14 patients received level 1, and 4 received level 2. Three of the patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in cycle 1 of level 2 (grade 3 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia and grade 2 neutropenia in one patient each), requiring that treatment was delayed for longer than 7 days. None of the 14 patients given level 1 had DLT or grade 3 or 4 gastrointestinal toxicity. Sensory neuropathy occurred in all patients. Objective response rates were 61% in the 18 patients studied and 64% at level 1. The median time to progression was 171 days, and the median overall survival time was 603 days in the 18 patients studied. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) with weekly bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m2) and high-dose l-LV (250 mg/m2) is recommended for further phase III studies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

A new active vitamin D, ED-71, increases bone mass in osteoporotic patients under vitamin D supplementation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

CONTEXT: ED-71 has been shown to increase lumbar bone mineral density (BMD) in osteoporotic subjects. However, vitamin D insufficiency might have influenced the effect of ED-71 on BMD. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine whether ED-71 can increase BMD in osteoporotic patients under vitamin D supplementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 219 osteoporotic patients (49-87 yr of age). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly assigned to receive placebo or 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 microg/d ED-71 for 12 months. All the subjects received 200 or 400 IU/d vitamin D(3). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed changes in lumbar and hip BMD and bone turnover markers from baseline. RESULTS: Lumbar BMD increased with ED-71 treatment for 12 months (2.2, 2.6, and 3.1% from baseline and 2.9, 3.4, and 3.8% vs. placebo group in subjects receiving 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 microg ED-71, respectively). Total hip BMD also increased with 0.75 and 1.0 microg ED-71 (-0.8, 0.6, and 0.9% from baseline and 0.1, 1.5, and 1.8% vs. placebo group in the 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 microg ED-71 groups, respectively). Bone formation and resorption markers were suppressed by approximately 20% after 12 months of 0.75 and 1.0 microg ED-71 treatment. Transient hypercalcemia over 2.6 mmol/liter occurred in 7, 5, and 23% of subjects in the 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 microg ED-71 groups, respectively, but none of them developed sustained hypercalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that ED-71 treatment at around 0.75 microg/d can effectively and safely increase lumbar and hip BMD in osteoporotic patients with vitamin D supplementation.