Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Parkinsons Dis ; 12(3): 1023-1034, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35147549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a debilitating neurodegenerative disease with both motor and non-motor manifestations. Available treatment reduces symptoms and is critical for improving quality of life. Treatment options include drugs, device-aided therapies, and non-pharmacological therapies. Complementary and alternative therapies (CATs) are also used in some countries. OBJECTIVE: To examine the availability of PD treatment by country, and differences by national income as defined by the World Bank (high income countries (HICs), upper middle income countries (UMICs), lower middle income countries (LMICs) and low income countries (LICs)). METHODS: This study was conducted by surveying International Parkinson and Movement Disorders Society members about availability of PD treatment. LMICs and LICs (LMICs/LICs) were analysed together. RESULTS: There were 352 valid responses from 76 countries (41.5% from HICs, 30.4% from UMICs, and 28.1% from LMICs/LICs). Levodopa was widely available across all income groups (99%). Availability of other PD drugs decreased with national income. Availability of device-aided therapies decreased with national income (100% availability in HICs, 92.5% among UMICs, and 57.6% among LMICs/LICs). A similar trend was observed for CATs (37.0% availability in HICs, 31.8% in UMICs, and 19.2% in LMIC/LICs). Physiotherapy was the most available non-pharmacological therapy (> 90% respondents). Occupational therapy and SALT were less available in LMIC/LICs (49.5% and 55.6% respectively) compared to HICs (80.1% and 84.9% respectively). CONCLUSION: Our survey highlights significant discrepancies in availability of PD treatments between countries and income groups. This is concerning given the symptomatic benefit patients gain from treatment. Improving equitable access to PD treatment should be prioritised.


Assuntos
Doenças Neurodegenerativas , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Renda , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Mov Disord ; 35(3): 450-456, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31774238

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current cervical dystonia (CD) incidence estimates are based on small numbers in relatively ethnically homogenous populations. The frequency and consequences of delayed CD diagnosis is poorly characterized. OBJECTIVES: To determine CD incidence and characterize CD diagnostic delay within a large, multiethnic integrated health maintenance organization. METHODS: We identified incident CD cases using electronic medical records and multistage screening of more than 3 million Kaiser Permanente Northern California members from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2007. A final diagnosis was made by movement disorders specialist consensus. Diagnostic delay was measured by questionnaire and health utilization data. Incidence rates were estimated assuming a Poisson distribution of cases and directly standardized to the 2000 U.S. census. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to assess diagnoses and behaviors preceding CD compared with matched controls, adjusting for age, sex, and membership duration. RESULTS: CD incidence was 1.18/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-2.0; women, 1.81; men, 0.52) based on 200 cases over 15.4 million person-years. Incidence increased with age. Half of the CD patients interviewed reported diagnostic delay. Diagnoses more common in CD patients before the index date included essential tremor (odds ratio [OR] 68.1; 95% CI, 28.2-164.5), cervical disc disease (OR 3.83; 95% CI, 2.8-5.2), neck sprain/strain (OR 2.77; 95% CI, 1.99-3.62), anxiety (OR 2.24; 95% CI, 1.63-3.11) and depression (OR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.4-2.68). CONCLUSIONS: CD incidence is greater in women and increases with age. Diagnostic delay is common and associated with adverse effects. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Assuntos
Diagnóstico Tardio , Torcicolo , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Torcicolo/diagnóstico , Torcicolo/epidemiologia
4.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 20(1): 82-7, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24120951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dietary fat intake may modify Parkinson's disease (PD) risk directly or by altering the response to environmental neurotoxicants including pesticides. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study of PD nested in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), a cohort of pesticide applicators and spouses. We evaluated diet and pesticide use before diagnosis in 89 PD cases, confirmed by movement disorder specialists, or a corresponding date in 336 frequency-matched controls. Associations were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In the AHS, PD was inversely associated with N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8 for highest vs. lowest tertile) and the N-3 precursor α-linolenic acid (0.4, 0.2-0.8). In a meta-analysis of nine studies, including the present one, PD was inversely associated with α-linolenic acid (0.81, 0.68-0.96). In the AHS, associations of PD with the pesticides paraquat and rotenone were modified by fat intake. The OR for paraquat was 4.2 (1.5-12) in individuals with PUFA intake below the median but 1.2 (0.4-3.4) in those with higher intake (p-interaction = 0.10). The OR for rotenone was 5.8 (2.3-15) in those with saturated fat intake above the median but 1.5 (0.5-4.2) in those with lower intake (p-interaction = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: PUFA intake was consistently associated with lower PD risk, and dietary fats modified the association of PD risk with pesticide exposure. If confirmed, these findings suggest that a diet high in PUFAs and low in saturated fats might reduce risk of PD.


Assuntos
Dieta , Gorduras na Dieta , Ácidos Graxos Ômega-3 , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Praguicidas/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
7.
Drug Saf ; 26(7): 461-81, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12735785

RESUMO

Essential tremor can cause significant functional disability in some patients. The arms are the most common body part affected and cause the most functional disability. The treatment of essential tremor includes medications, surgical options and other forms of therapy. Presently there is no cure for essential tremor nor are there any medications that can slow the progression of tremor. Treatment for essential tremor is recommended if the tremor causes functional disability. If the tremor is disabling only during periods of stress and anxiety, propranolol and benzodiazepines can be used during those periods when the tremor causes functional disability. The currently available medications can improve tremor in approximately 50% of the patients. If the tremor is disabling, treatment should be initiated with either primidone or propranolol. If either primidone or propranolol do not provide adequate control of the tremor, then the medications can be used in combination. If patients experience adverse effects with propranolol, occasionally other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (such as atenolol or metoprolol) can be used. If primidone and propranolol do not provide adequate control of tremor, occasionally the use of benzodiazepines (such as clonazepam) can provide benefit. Other medications that may be helpful include gabapentin or topiramate. If a patient has disabling head or voice tremor, botulinum toxin injections into the muscles may provide relief from the tremor. Botulinum toxin in the hand muscles for hand tremor can result in bothersome hand weakness and is not widely used. There are other medications that have been tried in essential tremor and have questionable efficacy. These drugs include carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (e.g. methazolamide), phenobarbital, calcium channel antagonists (e.g. nimodipine), isoniazid, clonidine, clozapine and mirtazapine. If the patient still has disabling tremor after medication trials, surgical options are usually considered. Surgical options include thalamotomy and deep brain stimulation of the thalamus. These surgical options provide adequate tremor control in approximately 90% of the patients. Surgical morbidity and mortality for these procedures is low. Deep brain stimulation and thalamotomy have been shown to have comparable efficacy but fewer complications have been reported with deep brain stimulation. In patients undergoing bilateral procedures deep brain stimulation of the thalamus is the procedure of choice to avoid adverse effects seen with bilateral ablative procedures. The use of medication and/or surgery can provide adequate tremor control in the majority of the patients.


Assuntos
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Tremor Essencial/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/farmacologia , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapêutico , Anticonvulsivantes/farmacologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Tremor Essencial/fisiopatologia , Tremor Essencial/cirurgia , Humanos , Fármacos Neuromusculares/farmacologia , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapêutico , Primidona/farmacologia , Primidona/uso terapêutico , Medição de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA