RESUMO
AIM: Off pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) involves, and is occasionally impaired by obligatory regional myocardial ischemia, particularly with the use of proximal coronary in-flow occlusion techniques. Intracoronary shunts do not guarantee absence of distal ischemia given their small inner diameter and the presence of proximal coronary stenosis. Additional adjunctive measures to provide short-term myocardial protection may facilitate OPCAB. High-energy phosphate supplementation with creatine phosphate prior to ischemia may attenuate ischemic dysfunction. METHODS: In a rodent model of a transient coronary occlusion and myocardial ischemia, 36 animals underwent preischemic intravenous infusion of either creatine phosphate or saline, 10 minutes of proximal left anterior descending (LAD) occlusion, and 10 minutes of reperfusion. Rats underwent continuous intracavitary pressure monitoring and cellular ATP levels were quantified using a luciferin/luciferase bioluminescence assay. RESULTS: Within 2 minutes of ischemia onset, creatine phosphate animals exhibited statistically significant greater preservation of myocardial function compared to controls, an augmentation which persisted throughout the duration of ischemia and subsequent reperfusion. Furthermore, significantly greater cellular ATP levels were observed among creatine phosphate treated animals (344+/-55 nMol/g tissue, n=5) compared to control animals (160+/-9 nMol/g tissue, n=5)(p=0.014). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of intravenous high-energy phosphate administration successfully prevented ischemic ventricular dysfunction in a rodent model of OPCAB.
Assuntos
Cardiotônicos/administração & dosagem , Ponte de Artéria Coronária sem Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Isquemia Miocárdica/prevenção & controle , Fosfocreatina/administração & dosagem , Trifosfato de Adenosina/metabolismo , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Infusões Intravenosas , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/metabolismo , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatologia , Miocárdio/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Troponina I/sangueRESUMO
Land application has become a widely applied method for treating wastewater. However, it is not always clear which soil-plant systems should be used, or why. The objectives of our study were to determine if four contrasting soils, from which the pasture is regularly cut and removed, varied in their ability to assimilate nutrients from secondary-treated domestic effluent under high hydraulic loadings, in comparison with unirrigated, fertilized pasture. Grassed intact soil cores (500 mm in diameter by 700 mm in depth) were irrigated (50 mm wk(-1)) with secondary-treated domestic effluent for two years. Soils included a well-drained Allophanic Soil (Typic Hapludand), a poorly drained Gley Soil (Typic Endoaquept), a well-drained Pumice Soil formed from rhyolitic tephra (Typic Udivitrand), and a well-drained Recent Soil formed in a sand dune (Typic Udipsamment). Effluent-irrigated soils received between 746 and 815 kg N ha(-1) and 283 and 331 kg P ha(-1) over two years of irrigation, and unirrigated treatments received 200 kg N ha(-1) and 100 kg P ha(-1) of dissolved inorganic fertilizer over the same period. Applying effluent significantly increased plant uptake of N and P from all soil types. For the effluent-irrigated soils plant N uptake ranged from 186 to 437 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), while plant P uptake ranged from 40 to 88 kg P ha(-1) yr(-1) for the effluent-irrigated soils. Applying effluent significantly increased N leaching losses from Gley and Recent Soils, and after two years ranged from 17 to 184 kg N ha(-1) depending on soil type. Effluent irrigation only increased P leaching from the Gley Soil. All P leaching losses were less than 49 kg P ha(-1) after two years. The N and P leached from effluent treatments were mainly in organic form (69-87% organic N and 35-65% unreactive P). Greater N and P leaching losses from the irrigated Gley Soil were attributed to preferential flow that reduced contact between the effluent and the soil matrix. Increased N leaching from the Recent Soil was the result of increased leaching of native soil organic N due to the higher hydraulic loading from the effluent irrigation.
Assuntos
Nitrogênio/farmacocinética , Fósforo/farmacocinética , Poaceae/química , Poluentes do Solo/farmacocinética , Solo , Eliminação de Resíduos Líquidos/métodos , Poluentes da Água/farmacocinética , Agricultura , Monitoramento Ambiental , Nitrogênio/análise , Permeabilidade , Fósforo/análise , Poluentes do Solo/análise , Solubilidade , Movimentos da Água , Poluentes da Água/análiseRESUMO
UNLABELLED: We retrospectively reviewed the anesthetic management, complications, and discharge time of 241 patients undergoing awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor to determine the feasibility of early discharge. The results were analyzed by using univariate analysis of variance and multiple logistic regression. The median length of stay for inpatients was 4 days. Fifteen patients (6%) were discharged 6 h after surgery and 76 patients (31%) were discharged on the next day. Anesthesia was provided by using local infiltration supplemented with neurolept anesthesia consisting of midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol. There was no significant difference in the total amount of sedation required. Overall, anesthetic complications were minimal. One patient (0.4%) required conversion to general anesthesia and one patient developed a venous air embolus. Fifteen patients (6%) had self-limiting intraoperative seizures that were short-lived. Of the 16 patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery, there was one readmission and one unanticipated admission. It may be feasible to discharge patients on the same or the next day after awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor. However, caution is advised and patient selection must be stringent with regards to the preoperative functional status of the patient, tumor depth, surrounding edema, patient support at home, and ease of access to hospital for readmission. IMPLICATIONS: It may be feasible to perform awake craniotomies for removal of intracranial tumor as an ambulatory procedure; however, caution is advised. Patient selection must be stringent with respect to the patient's preoperative functional status, tumor depth, surrounding edema, patient support at home, and ease of access to hospital for readmission.
Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Craniotomia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Criança , Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Tendinopatia/diagnóstico , Cotovelo de Tenista/diagnóstico , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Força da Mão , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Massagem , Exame Físico , Supinação , Tendinopatia/fisiopatologia , Tendinopatia/terapia , Cotovelo de Tenista/fisiopatologia , Cotovelo de Tenista/terapiaRESUMO
A randomized, parallel group, double-blind multi-centre study was carried out in 342 patients with symptomatic seasonal allergic rhinitis to assess the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal budesonide administered either as a single morning dose of 400 micrograms or as a 200 micrograms twice-daily dose, morning and evening, for 4 weeks. Both treatments improved the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis; specific nasal symptom scores recorded daily by the patient being reduced. The proportions of patients symptom free after 4-weeks' treatment were 46% in the 400 micrograms once-daily group and 54% in the 200 micrograms twice-daily group, with total daily symptom scores recorded by diary cards reduced by 79% and 80%, respectively. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant. Sub-group analysis of patients allergic to grass pollen (n = 166) showed similar total symptom scores at each level of grass pollen exposure (no significant difference between treatment groups). Patients assessed both treatments to be effective (no significant difference between groups), with 65% of patients questioned stating a preference for a once-daily treatment given equal symptom control. Both treatments were equally well tolerated and few side-effects were reported.