Hemodynamic and skin perfusion is associated with successful enteral nutrition therapy in septic shock patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Enteral nutrition is controversial in hemodynamically unstable patients. This study aimed to evaluate the association between hemodynamic and skin perfusion parameters and enteral nutrition therapy (NT) outcomes in septic shock patients. METHODS: Ventilated adults with septic shock were evaluated at bedside upon admission (H0), and at 12 h (H1), 24 h (H2) and 48 h (H3) for mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, urine output, lactate levels, mottling score, capillary refill time (CRT), central-to-toe temperature gradient and norepinephrine dose. Two groups were stratified: NT success (NTS) (≥20 kcal/kg or 11 kcal/kg for obese in the first ICU week) or NT failure (NTF). A generalized linear model and generalized estimating equations were performed. RESULTS: Over a 19-month period, 2167 admissions were assessed and 141 patients were analyzed (63.5 ± 15.0 years, SAPS-3 75 ± 12, 102 [72%] in the NTS vs. 39 [28%] in NTF). At 12 h, the failure group showed more severe mottling scores, higher lactate levels, norepinephrine dose and central-to-toe temperature gradient. Mottling score at 12 h was a predictor of NT failure (RR 1.28 95%CI [1.09-1.50], p = .003). Over 48 h, higher mottling scores, lactate levels and norepinephrine dosage, % of patients with central-to-toe temperature gradient and CRT ≥3 s were observed in the failure group and higher urine output and MAP values were observed in the success group. CONCLUSION: Early improvement in hemodynamic and skin perfusion parameters was associated with success in nutrition therapy, and mottling score at 12 h was a risk factor for nutrition therapy failure. This data could support the recommendation to start NT after hemodynamic and perfusion goals are achieved and to proactively evaluate bedside parameters while implementing NT in critical care setting.

Seven Deadly Sins of Nutrition Therapy in Critically Ill Patients.

This article presents 7 nutrition steps that, if not followed by the clinical staff, may be metaphorically considered as "7 deadly sins" of nutrition therapy. In this review, we suggest approaches that must be avoided or accomplished to increase compliance with the "Ten Commandments" of good nutrition practice in the intensive care setting. Multiple aggressive and simultaneous sets of therapies are implemented in the intensive care setting, which include nutrition and metabolic support as important components in these therapies. "Sins" should be remembered as a mnemonic device for nutrition standard care in the intensive care unit; this incorporates nutrition adequacy and protocol adherence.