Histopathological evaluation of the effectiveness of oral Eppikajutsuto treatment for lymphatic malformation.

BACKGROUND: Lymphatic malformation (LM) is a congenital disease caused by lymphatic vessel malformation. Although standard therapies for LMs are sclerotherapy and/or surgical excision, a new therapy using Japanese herbal medicine Eppikajutsuto (TJ-28) has been recently reported as clinically effective. We aimed to experimentally confirm the therapeutic effectiveness of TJ-28 for LMs. METHODS: LM lesions were generated in the mesentery and peritoneum of mice by intraperitoneal injection of Freund's incomplete adjuvant. Mice with LMs were treated by gavage or dietary administration of TJ-28 for 2 months. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections of mesentery and peritoneum tissues were histologically and immunohistochemically examined by focusing on lymph nodes and perinodal lymph vessels. RESULTS: Multiple Freund's incomplete adjuvant-associated foreign-body granulomas were formed in the mesentery and peritoneum, resulting in congestion of lymph fluid and dilatation of lymph vessels. The numbers and sizes of lymph nodes were not significantly different between TJ-28-treated and control groups. However, the luminal areas of lymphatic vessels were reduced significantly in the TJ-28 treatment group by both gavage and dietary administrations. CONCLUSION: TJ-28 conspicuously reduced congestion of lymph fluid. This is the first histopathological evaluation of LM model mice to study the effectiveness of oral TJ-28 treatment.

Incidence of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration in dogs.

Propofol is an anesthetic agent suspended in an emulsion system that includes egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil, because of which, there is concern about the use of propofol in patients allergic to these substances. We examined the association between propofol administration and incidence of adverse events in dogs with allergy to egg yolk lecithin and soybean oil. On the basis of the findings of an allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) test, 14 dogs with high levels (high-IgE group) and 7 dogs with low levels (normal-IgE group) of IgE were selected. Following intravenous administration of propofol, the incidence of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations under general anesthesia maintained with isoflurane throughout surgery were compared between the two groups. The frequency of anaphylactic reactions and plasma histamine concentrations were compared by the chi-square test and Student t-test, respectively. The statistical significance for both tests was set at P<0.05. In the high- and normal-IgE groups, the average frequencies of anaphylactic reactions after propofol administration were 21.4 and 14.3%, and the mean plasma histamine concentrations were 167.9 ± 94.5 nM and 65.7 ± 40.3 nM, respectively. Animals of neither groups experienced shock-like symptoms. These results revealed that propofol might be relatively safe, although careful perioperative anesthesia monitoring and standby protocols are required when using propofol in dogs with a history of allergic diseases or high chicken- or soybean-specific IgE levels.