Efficacy and safety of narrowband ultraviolet B versus combined ultraviolet A/narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy in the treatment of chronic atopic dermatitis: A randomised double-blind study.

Phototherapy is a useful treatment modality for atopic dermatitis (AD). This is a prospective randomised double-blind study comparing the clinical efficacy of combined ultraviolet-A (UVA)/narrowband ultraviolet-B (NBUVB) versus NBUVB phototherapy in the treatment of chronic AD. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD were randomised to receive either UVA/NBUVB or NBUVB phototherapy twice weekly over 12 weeks. At baseline, weeks 6 and 12, Eczema Area And Severity Index (EASI), itch score and adverse effects were assessed. At baseline and week 12, disease-related quality of life was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Nine patients were randomised to receive UVA/NBUVB and 10 received NBUVB. At week 12, both groups showed significant improvement in EASI and itch scores (p < 0.05). Significant improvement in DLQI was seen in the UVA/NBUVB arm (p = 0.009) with a trend towards improvement in the NBUVB arm (p = 0.11). The efficacy of both modalities were comparable, as were reported adverse effects aside from skin dryness which was higher in the NBUVB arm (40% vs. 0%, p = 0.033). Combined UVA/NBUVB and NBUVB phototherapy have comparable clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of chronic AD. NBUVB may induce greater skin dryness.

Chronic Pruritus in the Geriatric Population.

Chronic pruritus (>6 week's duration) in the geriatric population (≥65 years old), is an increasing health care problem. The pathophysiologic predisposing factors are abnormalities of the epidermal barrier, immune system, and nervous system. Causes can be dichotomized into histaminergic and nonhistaminergic pruritus. Topical treatments are generally safe. Systemic treatments are chosen depending on the condition, comorbid diseases, and drug interactions. Treatment options are limited. Progress has been made in identifying itch-selective mediators over the last decade. Numerous new medications are currently undergoing clinical trials and they are anticipated to enter the clinics in the near future.

Idiopathic aquagenic pruritus: pathogenesis and effective treatment with atenolol.

Aquagenic pruritus (AP) is a rare condition with unknown pathogenesis. We explored its pathogenesis through investigations of a patient and report the first case to be effectively treated with atenolol. A 36-year-old Indian female presented with idiopathic AP. Small-fiber neuropathy involving itch/pain-transmitting C-fibers appears to be pathogenetically important: compared with matched controls, our patient had increased intra-epidermal nerve fibers, raised warmth detection threshold, and marked hyperknesis to electrical stimulation. Autonomic nerve function tests and fingertips vasoconstriction response were normal, indicating integrity of other small (Aδ and C) nerve fibers. She was initially treated with propranolol with good response, but was subsequently switched to atenolol for convenient once-a-day dosing. Symptoms were well controlled long term with no side effect experienced. Atenolol may exert its effect in AP through blockage of over-activated neuronal sodium channels. Through the investigations, we propose that the pathogenesis of idiopathic AP may involve the following: upon contact of the skin with water, yet-unknown mediator/s released stimulate dysfunctional and hyper-innervated C-nerve fibers, which may have resulted from a sodium channel defect. Atenolol may be a preferred therapeutic option compared with propanolol, in view of its convenient once-a-day dosing and better side effect profile.