Family history of psychosis moderates early auditory cortical response abnormalities in non-psychotic bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Bipolar I disorder is a disabling illness affecting 1% of people worldwide. Family and twin studies suggest that psychotic bipolar disorder (BDP) represents a homogeneous subgroup with an etiology distinct from non-psychotic bipolar disorder (BDNP) and partially shared with schizophrenia. Studies of auditory electrophysiology [e.g., paired-stimulus and oddball measured with electroencephalography (EEG)] consistently report deviations in psychotic groups (schizophrenia, BDP), yet such studies comparing BDP and BDNP are sparse and, in some cases, conflicting. Auditory EEG responses are significantly reduced in unaffected relatives of psychosis patients, suggesting that they may relate to both psychosis liability and expression. METHODS: While 64-sensor EEGs were recorded, age- and gender-matched samples of 70 BDP, 35 BDNP {20 with a family history of psychosis [BDNP(+)]}, and 70 psychiatrically healthy subjects were presented with typical auditory paired-stimuli and auditory oddball paradigms. RESULTS: Oddball P3b reductions were present and indistinguishable across all patient groups. P2s to paired stimuli were abnormal only in BDP and BDNP(+). Conversely, N1 reductions to stimuli in both paradigms and P3a reductions were present in both BDP and BDNP(-) groups but were absent in BDNP(+). CONCLUSIONS: Although nearly all auditory neural response components studied were abnormal in BDP, BDNP abnormalities at early- and mid-latencies were moderated by family psychosis history. The relationship between psychosis expression, heritable psychosis risk, and neurophysiology within bipolar disorder, therefore, may be complex. Consideration of such clinical disease heterogeneity may be important for future investigations of the pathophysiology of major psychiatric disturbance.

Neural activations during auditory oddball processing discriminating schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Reduced amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in auditory oddball tasks may characterize schizophrenia (SZ) but is also reported in bipolar disorder. Similarity of auditory processing abnormalities between these diagnoses is uncertain, given the frequent combination of both psychotic and nonpsychotic patients in bipolar samples; abnormalities may be restricted to psychosis. In addition, typically only latency and amplitude of brain responses at selected sensors and singular time points are used to characterize neural responses. Comprehensive quantification of brain activations involving both spatiotemporal and time-frequency analyses could better identify unique auditory oddball responses among patients with different psychotic disorders. METHODS: Sixty SZ, 60 bipolar I with psychosis (BPP), and 60 healthy subjects (H) were compared on neural responses during an auditory oddball task using multisensor electroencephalography. Principal components analysis was used to reduce multisensor data before evaluating group differences on voltage and frequency of neural responses over time. RESULTS: Linear discriminant analysis revealed five variables that best differentiated groups: 1) late beta activity to standard stimuli; 2) late beta/gamma activity to targets discriminated BPP from other groups; 3) midlatency theta/alpha activity to standards; 4) target-related voltage at the late N2 response discriminated both psychosis groups from H; and 5) target-related voltage during early N2 discriminated BPP from H. CONCLUSIONS: Although the P300 significantly differentiated psychotic groups from H, it did not uniquely discriminate groups beyond the above variables. No variable uniquely discriminated SZ, perhaps indicating utility of this task for studying psychosis-associated neurophysiology generally and BPP specifically.

Spatiotemporal and frequency domain analysis of auditory paired stimuli processing in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychosis.

Individuals with schizophrenia (SZ) or bipolar disorder with psychosis (BPP) may share neurophysiological abnormalities as measured in auditory paired-stimuli paradigms with electroencephalography (EEG). Such investigations have been limited, however, by quantifying only event-related potential peaks and/or broad frequency bands at limited scalp locations without considering possible mediating factors (e.g., baseline differences). Results from 64-sensor EEG collected in 180 age- and gender-matched participants reveal (i) accentuated prestimulus gamma oscillations and (ii) reduced P2 amplitudes and theta/alpha oscillations to S1 among participants with both SZ and BPP. Conversely, (iii) N1s in those with SZ to S1 were reduced compared to healthy volunteers and those with BPP, whereas (iv) beta range oscillations 200-300 ms following S2 were accentuated in those with BPP but not those with SZ. Results reveal a pattern of both unique and shared neurophysiological phenotypes occurring within major psychotic diagnoses.

Neurophysiological endophenotypes across bipolar and schizophrenia psychosis.

The search for liability genes of the world's 2 major psychotic disorders, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder I (BP-I), has been extremely difficult even though evidence suggests that both are highly heritable. This difficulty is due to the complex and multifactorial nature of these disorders. They encompass several intermediate phenotypes, some overlapping across the 2 psychotic disorders that jointly and/or interactively produce the clinical manifestations. Research of the past few decades has identified several neurophysiological deficits in schizophrenia that frequently occur before the onset of psychosis. These include abnormalities in smooth pursuit eye movements, P50 sensory gating, prepulse inhibition, P300, mismatch negativity, and neural synchrony. Evidence suggests that many of these physiological deficits are distinct from each other. They are stable, mostly independent of symptom state and medications (with some exceptions) and are also observed in non-ill relatives. This suggests a familial and perhaps genetic nature. Some deficits are also observed in the BP-I probands and to a lesser extent their relatives. These deficits in physiological measures may represent the intermediate phenotypes that index small effects of genes (and/or environmental factors). The use of these measures in genetic studies may help the hunt for psychosis liability genes and clarify the extent to which the 2 major psychotic disorders share etio-pathophysiology. In spite of the rich body of work describing these neurophysiological measures in psychotic disorders, challenges remain: Many of the neurophysiological phenotypes are still relatively complex and are associated with low heritability estimates. Further refinement of these physiological phenotypes is needed that could identify specific underlying physiological deficits and thereby improve their heritability estimates. The extent to which these neurophysiological deficits are unique or overlap across BP-I and schizophrenia is unclear. And finally, the clinical and functional consequences of the neurophysiological deficits both in the probands and their relatives are not well described.

Nicotine effect on prepulse inhibition and prepulse facilitation in schizophrenia patients.

Acoustic prepulse inhibition (PPI) is considered an important biomarker in animal studies of psychosis and a number of psychiatric conditions. Nicotine has been shown to improve acoustic PPI in some animal strains and in humans. However, there is little data on effects of nicotine on acoustic PPI in schizophrenia patients using a double-blind, placebo-controlled study design. The primary aim of the current study was to test the effect of nicotine nasal spray on acoustic PPI in schizophrenia patients. The secondary aim was to test nicotine effect on prepulse facilitation (PPF). The study included 18 schizophrenia patient smokers and 12 healthy control smokers, tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, randomized design immediately after nicotine or saline placebo nasal sprays. PPI was tested using 120 ms prepulse-pulse interval. PPF was tested using 4500 ms prepulse-pulse interval. The results showed a significant main effect of drug on PPI in that nicotine improved PPI compared to placebo (p=0.008) with no drug by diagnosis interaction (p=0.90). Improvement in PPI in response to nicotine was significantly correlated with the baseline severity of clinical symptoms (r=0.59, p=0.02) in patients. There was no significant drug or drug by diagnosis interaction for the 4500 ms prepulse-pulse interval condition. However, nicotine improved inhibition in a subgroup of subjects exhibiting PPF (p=0.002). In conclusion, the findings confirmed that nicotine transiently improves acoustic PPI in schizophrenia patients. Additionally, schizophrenia patients with more clinical symptoms may have benefited more from nicotinic effect on PPI.

Independent domains of inhibitory gating in schizophrenia and the effect of stimulus interval.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with schizophrenia are known to have inhibitory gating deficits in the suppression of evoked potential P50 response to repeated stimuli and the prepulse inhibition of the startle response. In the current study, the authors aimed to determine whether these two inhibitory gating measures are related in schizophrenia patients or whether abnormal P50 suppression and abnormal prepulse inhibition are independent neurophysiological characteristics of schizophrenia. The authors hypothesized that the relationship of the two measures may vary as a function of interstimulus intervals of stimulus presentations. METHOD: Fifty-nine schizophrenia patients and 17 healthy comparison subjects were tested on both P50 suppression and prepulse inhibition. P50 suppression was measured using paired clicks with 500-msec interstimulus intervals. Prepulse inhibition was measured by using a series of prepulse-pulse pairs with interstimulus intervals ranging from 30 to 500 msec. RESULTS: Patients showed reduced P50 suppression and prepulse inhibition in relation to healthy comparison subjects. Concordance analysis showed that abnormal P50 suppression and abnormal prepulse inhibition do not necessarily occur together. Prepulse inhibition was most prominent at the 120-msec interstimulus interval, which was not correlated to P50 suppression. At the 500-msec interstimulus interval, prepulse inhibition was significantly but negatively correlated to P50 suppression. Prepulse inhibition at the other interstimulus intervals was not correlated with P50 suppression. CONCLUSIONS: These neurophysiological measures lack robust and direct relationships and likely mark independent aspects of abnormal brain inhibitory functions in schizophrenia.

Gamma/beta oscillation and sensory gating deficit in schizophrenia.

Sensory gating can be measured by the suppression of auditory evoked potentials in a paired-click paradigm. The normal gating of the P50 response to the second stimulus (S2) is impaired in many schizophrenic patients. Various in vitro and in vivo evoked potential paradigms have shown that a stimulus evokes early gamma frequency oscillation, which is followed by beta frequency oscillation. The gamma-to-beta shift in response to the first stimulus (SI) in the paired-click paradigm may contain critical electrophysiological signals that modulate the S2 suppression. The results of the present study showed that post-SI beta frequency response was inversely correlated to the S2 P50 response in patients with schizophrenia.