Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 28(7): e76-e83, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27206342

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to test whether or not the use of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel with or without the addition of an arginylglycylaspartic acid (RGD) sequence applied as a matrix in combination with hydroxyapatite/tricalciumphosphate (HA/TCP) results in similar peri-implant bone regeneration as traditional guided bone regeneration procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 12 beagle dogs, implant placement and peri-implant bone regeneration were performed 2 months after tooth extraction in the maxilla. Two standardized box-shaped defects were bilaterally created, and dental implants were placed in the center of the defects with a dehiscence of 4 mm. Four treatment modalities were randomly applied: i)HA/TCP mixed with a synthetic PEG hydrogel, ii)HA/TCP mixed with a synthetic PEG hydrogel supplemented with an RGD sequence, iii)HA/TCP covered with a native collagen membrane (CM), iv)and no bone augmentation (empty). After a healing period of 8 or 16 weeks, micro-CT and histological analyses were performed. RESULTS: Histomorphometric analysis revealed a greater relative augmented area for groups with bone augmentation (43.3%-53.9% at 8 weeks, 31.2%-42.8% at 16 weeks) compared to empty controls (22.9% at 8 weeks, 1.1% at 16 weeks). The median amount of newly formed bone was greatest in group CM at both time-points. Regarding the first bone-to-implant contact, CM was statistically significantly superior to all other groups at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Bone can partially be regenerated at peri-implant buccal dehiscence defects using traditional guided bone regeneration techniques. The use of a PEG hydrogel applied as a matrix mixed with a synthetic bone substitute material might lack a sufficient stability over time for this kind of defect.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Fosfatos de Cálcio/farmacologia , Implantes Dentários , Durapatita/farmacologia , Regeneração Tecidual Guiada Periodontal/métodos , Hidrogel de Polietilenoglicol-Dimetacrilato/farmacologia , Oligopeptídeos/farmacologia , Deiscência da Ferida Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Substitutos Ósseos/farmacologia , Colágeno/farmacologia , Cães , Maxila/diagnóstico por imagem , Maxila/cirurgia , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Microtomografia por Raio-X
2.
J Periodontol ; 81(5): 737-47, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20429653

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel matrix covalently bound to a 35-amino acid peptide of parathyroid hormone cystein-PTH 1-34 (cys-PTH 1-34) was shown to enhance bone regeneration around implants. The aim of this study is to test if the addition of an integrin-receptor-binding arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-containing peptide at early healing time points improves the performance of the PEG matrix supplemented with cys-PTH 1-34 (PTH) when applied in acute defects around implants at early healing time points (2 and 4 weeks). METHODS: Six dogs received 48 implants. Each side of the mandible was randomly assigned for implantation at day 0 or 2 weeks. A circumferential critical-size defect was created at each site before implantation. Sites were randomly assigned to one of four groups: 1) PEG alone (PEG group), 2) PEG plus RGD (PEG/RGD group), 3) PEG plus PTH (PEG/PTH group), and 4) PEG plus RGD plus PTH (PEG/RGD/PTH group). Dogs were sacrificed 2 weeks after the second surgery, and specimens were obtained for histologic analysis. For the statistical analysis, mixed linear regression with repeated measurements was used, and a Dunnett-Hsu adjustment was made for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: At 2 weeks, the percentages of new bone formation within the defect were 12.43% for the PEG group, 15.95% for the PEG/RGD group, 15.32% for the PEG/PTH group, and 16.60% for the PEG/RGD/PTH group. At 4 weeks, the percentages of new bone formation within the defect were 30.01% for the PEG group, 27.90% for the PEG/RGD group, 29.89% for the PEG/PTH group, and 27.58% for the PEG/RGD/PTH group. A marginally significant difference (PEG/RGD/PTH group versus PEG group; P = 0.055) was found at 2 weeks but not at 4 weeks. The highest percentage of bone-to-implant contact (BIC) in the defect site at 2 weeks was observed for the PEG/RGD group (8.57%). The BIC after 4 weeks of healing ranged from 11.54% (PEG/RGD/PTH group) to 16.61% (PEG group). No statistically significant differences were observed in BIC. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of binding PTH covalently to a synthetic, RGD-modified PEG hydrogel marginally significantly improved bone formation at 2 weeks of healing compared to the use of PEG alone. Bone regeneration within the defects increased in all groups at week 4 of healing without statistically significant differences.


Assuntos
Regeneração Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cisteína/uso terapêutico , Implantes Dentários , Regeneração Tecidual Guiada Periodontal/métodos , Hidrogel de Polietilenoglicol-Dimetacrilato , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Hormônio Paratireóideo/uso terapêutico , Fragmentos de Peptídeos/uso terapêutico , Sequência de Aminoácidos , Animais , Cães , Masculino , Mandíbula/efeitos dos fármacos , Mandíbula/patologia , Doenças Mandibulares/patologia , Doenças Mandibulares/cirurgia , Osseointegração/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteogênese/efeitos dos fármacos , Distribuição Aleatória , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA