Distressed communities are associated with worse outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Although low socioeconomic status has been associated with increased risk of complications after cardiac surgery, analyses have typically focused on insurance status, race, or median income. We sought to determine if the Distressed Communities Index, a composite socioeconomic metric, could predict operative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: All patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (2011-2018) in the National Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database were analyzed. Clinical data were paired with the Distressed Communities Index, which accounts for unemployment, education level, poverty rate, median income, business growth, and housing vacancies by ZIP code. Developed by the Economic Innovation Group, Distressed Communities Index scores range from 0 (no distress) to 100 (severe distress). A distressed community was defined as one having a Distressed Communities Index of 75 or greater for univariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 575,900 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with a Distressed Communities Index score, the median age was 65 years. The operative mortality rate was 2.0%, and the composite morbidity or mortality rate was 11.5%. Distressed communities were associated with increased Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality (1.97% vs 1.85%, P < .0001) and risk of composite morbidity or mortality (12.8% vs 11.7%, P < .0001). After adjusting for Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model, the Distressed Communities Index remained significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio, 1.12; P < .0001) and composite morbidity and mortality (odds ratio, 1.03; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients from distressed communities are at increased risk for adverse events and death after coronary artery bypass grafting. The Distressed Communities Index is a useful, holistic measure of socioeconomic status that may help identify high-risk patients for quality improvement and should be considered when building risk models or comparing hospitals.

Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is typically performed under general anesthesia (GA). However, there is increasing data supporting the safety of performing TAVR under local anesthesia/conscious sedation (LA). We performed a meta-analysis to gain better understanding of the safety and efficacy of LA versus GA in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: We comprehensively searched EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. Effect sizes were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) difference of the mean (DM), and 95% CIs (confidence intervals) for dichotomous and continuous variables respectively. Twenty-six studies and 10,572 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The use of LA for TAVR was associated with lower overall 30-day mortality (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57-0.93; P = 0.01), use of inotropic/vasopressor drugs (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72; P < 0.001), hospital length of stay (LOS) (DM, -2.09; 95% CI, -3.02 to -1.16; P < 0.001), intensive care unit LOS (DM, -0.18; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.04; P = 0.01), procedure time (DM, -25.02; 95% CI, -32.70 to -17.35; P < 0.001); and fluoroscopy time (DM, -1.63; 95% CI, -3.02 to -0.24; P = 0.02). No differences were observed between LA and GA for stroke, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, paravalvular leak, vascular complications, major bleeding, procedural success, conduction abnormalities, and annular rupture. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that use of LA for TAVR is associated with a lower 30-day mortality, shorter procedure time, fluoroscopy time, ICU LOS, hospital length of stay, and reduced need for inotropic support.

Cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial (Cohort A).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. BACKGROUND: TAVR is an alternative to AVR for patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk. METHODS: We performed a formal economic analysis based on cost, quality of life, and survival data collected in the PARTNER A (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial in which patients with severe aortic stenosis and high surgical risk were randomized to TAVR or AVR. Cumulative 12-month costs (assessed from a U.S. societal perspective) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were compared separately for the transfemoral (TF) and transapical (TA) cohorts. RESULTS: Although 12-month costs and QALYs were similar for TAVR and AVR in the overall population, there were important differences when results were stratified by access site. In the TF cohort, total 12-month costs were slightly lower with TAVR and QALYs were slightly higher such that TF-TAVR was economically dominant compared with AVR in the base case and economically attractive (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000/QALY) in 70.9% of bootstrap replicates. In the TA cohort, 12-month costs remained substantially higher with TAVR, whereas QALYs tended to be lower such that TA-TAVR was economically dominated by AVR in the base case and economically attractive in only 7.1% of replicates. CONCLUSIONS: In the PARTNER trial, TAVR was an economically attractive strategy compared with AVR for patients suitable for TF access. Future studies are necessary to determine whether improved experience and outcomes with TA-TAVR can improve its cost-effectiveness relative to AVR.

Controlled intermittent asystole cardiac therapy induced by pharmacologically potentiated vagus nerve stimulation in normal and hibernating myocardium.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacologically potentiated electrical stimulation of the right vagus nerve achieves controlled intermittent asystole cardiac therapy. The present study examined pathophysiologic consequences of repetitive intermittent asystoles on contractile function, myocardial blood flow, and vagus nerve function and morphology. METHODS: Open-chest anesthetized canines, with either normal left anterior descending (LAD) coronary arteries (n = 8) or severely stenotic LADs (n = 8), received pharmacologic pretreatment with pyridostigmine (0.5 mg/kg), propranolol (80 microg/kg), and verapamil (50 microg/kg) before vagus nerve stimulation. Time-matched control animals with normal (n = 4) or severely stenotic LADs (n = 6) received drugs but no vagus nerve stimulation. The vagus nerve was stimulated for 12 seconds ("on") and rested for 15 seconds ("off"). This algorithm was repeated for 15 on-off cycles, simulating using controlled intermittent asystole during the placement of 15 sutures in a distal coronary anastomosis. This 15-cycle sequence was repeated twice more, simulating a three-vessel bypass. RESULTS: Normal coronary arteries: Ninety minutes after three sets of controlled intermittent asystole, LAD blood flow was unchanged from base line (36.6 +/- 4.5 versus 33.0 +/- 4.2 mL/min, p = 0.4), and global left ventricular performance (impedance catheter, end-systolic pressure-volume relations) was similar to baseline (7.4 +/- 1.2 versus 7.2 +/- 1.0 mm Hg/mL, p = 0.1). Left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis model: Ninety minutes after CIA, there were no significant differences versus control animals in regional LAD blood flow (27 +/- 4 versus 29 +/- 5 mL/min, p = 0.4) or fractional shortening of LAD myocardium (sonomicrometry; 6.2% +/- 1.8% versus 5.4% +/- 1.2%, p = 0.1). Vagus nerve conduction and morphology were unchanged from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Repetitive controlled intermittent asystole does not impair poststimulation coronary blood flow, cardiac contractile function, or vagus nerve function. Controlled intermittent asystole may be useful to facilitate off-pump or endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.