Management and clinical consequences of red blood cell antibodies in pregnancy: A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-D alloimmunization is the most common cause of severe hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). The management of pregnancies affected by less frequent red blood cell (RBC) antibodies poses a challenge to clinicians, and perinatal outcomes are less well described. This study aimed to describe the frequency of clinically significant RBC antibodies in our pregnant population and analyze the risk of prenatal and postnatal treatment for HDFN in relation to our national risk classification system and management guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study in the population of all alloimmunized singleton pregnancies in the Stockholm region 1990-2016. Descriptive summaries of different RBC antibodies and pregnancy outcomes were presented, the risks of intrauterine blood transfusion (IUT) and neonatal treatment for HDFN were estimated by type of antibodies. RESULTS: Of the 1724 alloimmunized pregnancies, 1079 (63%) were at risk of HDFN and constituted our study cohort. Anti-D was detected in 492 (46%) pregnancies, followed by anti-E in 161 (15%), and anti-c in 128 (12%). Eighty-seven (8%) pregnancies had IUT, with the highest risk in pregnancies affected by anti-D combined with other antibodies. The maximum titer recorded before IUT was 64 or above, except for two pregnancies affected by anti-c, for which the maximum titers were 8 and 16. For the 942 (95%) live-born neonates from 992 alloimmunized pregnancies without IUT, the median gestational age at birth was 38+5  weeks compared with 35+5  weeks for those who had IUT. Neonatal treatment was most common in the anti-D alone and anti-D combined groups, with 136 (57%) and 21 (44%), respectively, treated with phototherapy and 35 (15%) and 9 (20%) receiving exchange transfusions, respectively. For pregnancies complicated by moderate- and low-risk antibodies, phototherapy was less frequent (32 [36%] and 21 [19%]) and exchange transfusion was rare (5 [6%] and 3 [3%]). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-D, especially in combination with other antibodies, presents the highest risk of severe HDFN. The classification of less frequent and less well-known RBC antibodies into risk groups can help clinicians in assessing the risk of HDFN and counseling alloimmunized pregnant women regarding the risk of prenatal and postnatal treatments.

Anti-D quantification in relation to anti-D titre, middle cerebral artery Doppler measurement and clinical outcome in RhD-immunized pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy to monitor RhD-immunized pregnancies is not evident. Whether a quantitative analysis of anti-D antibodies adds valuable information to anti-D titre is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relevance of anti-D quantification in routine monitoring of RhD-immunized pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, 64 consecutive pregnancies in 61 immunized women with anti-D titre ≥128 at any time during pregnancy were included. According to routine, at titre ≥128, anti-D quantification was performed by flow cytometry and the peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery was measured by ultrasound. Decisions for treatment with intrauterine blood transfusion were based on increased peak systolic velocity in the middle cerebral artery. RESULTS: Increasing anti-D concentrations correlated well to increasing anti-D titres, but at each titre value, there was a large interindividual variation, in the determined anti-D concentration. Intrauterine transfusions were initiated in 35 pregnancies according to algorithms based on ultrasound measurements, at anti-D concentrations of 2·4-619 IU/ml and titre 128-16 000. Sixty pregnancies resulted in a live-born child, three in miscarriage and one in termination of pregnancy. During the perinatal care in the neonatal intensive care unit, thirty-one of the neonates were treated with blood exchange transfusions and/or red cell transfusions and 47 were treated with phototherapy. CONCLUSION: Anti-D quantification does not add further information compared to anti-D titre, in defining a critical level to start monitoring RhD-immunized pregnancies with Doppler ultrasound.