Analysis of the characteristics and outcomes of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin treated with curative-intent surgery.

BACKGROUND: There are no previous studies on pseudomyxoma peritonei regarding the details of surgical procedures included in cytoreductive surgery and quantitative evaluation for peritoneal metastases by region in the abdominal cavity. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and procedural details involved in cytoreductive surgery, and survival outcomes of patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, and identify differences in the difficulty of cytoreductive surgery based on tumor location. METHODS: Patient characteristics and survival outcomes were studied through a retrospective review. The complete cytoreduction rate (i), the 5-year survival rate for patients with complete cytoreduction (ii), and an index as a complement (i × ii × 100) were described for patients who had tumors larger than 50 mm in one of the 13 regions of the abdominal cavity. RESULTS: A total of 989 patients were treated with curative-intent cytoreductive surgery. The median peritoneal cancer index was 18 (interquartile range, 6-29), with complete cytoreduction achieved in 702 patients (71%); the major complication rate was 17%. The median overall survival was 92.9 months, compared to 53.8 months for patients who underwent total gastrectomy and 30.4 months for those who underwent total colectomy. In the 13 abdominal regions, the index scores indicating cytoreduction difficulty were categorized into three risk groups: upper and mid-abdominal (>20), lateral abdominal (10-20), and small bowel (<10). CONCLUSIONS: Cytoreductive surgery offered favorable survival outcomes, even in cases involving total gastrectomy. The difficulty of achieving complete cytoreduction varied across abdominal regions and was classified into three levels.

[A Case of Sigmoid Colon Cancer with Metastasis to the Uterus].

A 65-year-old woman complaining of fetor ex vagina was diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma of the uterus based on the pathological findings of an endometrial biopsy. Sigmoid colon cancer was found on a pre-operative CT scan. Diagnosis of double cancer was made and we performed sigmoidectomy and panhysterectomy with associated resection of both adnexa. Histopathological examination found that the tumor accounted for almost all of the uterine mucosa and over half of the muscular layer. Immunostaining showed CK7 (-), CK20 (+), CDX2 (+), ER (-), and PgR (-), and we diagnosed it as a metastasis to the uterus of the sigmoid colon cancer. The pathological diagnosis was a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, pT4b (SI: urinary bladder), pN0 (0/12), H0, P1,M1a (uterus), pStage Ⅳ. As adjuvant chemotherapy, she was administered XELOX for 6 months. Although colorectal cancer rarely metastasizes to the uterus, due to the increase in the prevalence of colorectal cancer, it may be also increase. To choose the best treatment course, it is necessary to diagnose whether it is a primary uterine cancer or a metastatic uterine cancer.